|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: BigJim]
#842113
10/20/07 09:56 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6
OP
Need a Spot
|
yes money would be the issue. if i had the money i would just take it to a mechanic to fix it.
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: chfbrd]
#842114
10/22/07 03:58 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6
OP
Need a Spot
|
is there nobody whocan help me??? is so &^%&^%^%!@#$#@!@#$ frustrating!!
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: chfbrd]
#842115
10/22/07 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,211
Body Damage is Cool
|
As always, glad to help...if you want to do it right.
SD
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: superdawg]
#842116
10/23/07 03:08 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 46
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
If making it run worse, resulting in polluting more, other types of repairs resulting in an unsafe vehicle to be on the highways or even trails is the result...Well, if you think your learning curve is worth that...speak up.
Techs like, teachers, doctors, truckers, union workers, non union workers...everyone does a job that somewhere along the like you or me pay them for a hard days work.
If being poor gives you the "right" to tamper with federal pollution equipment and create a polluting rig because you can't afford proper repairs....take the bus, walk.
SD If you spend some good money on good repairs we all do better. dude cut the guy some slack who died and left you in controll
92 jeep yj re 4 inch lift revolver shackels front and rear 36 inch shocks in front 27 inch in rear 34 swampers ltb 2inch wheel spacers
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: cbrazor]
#842117
10/23/07 05:24 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,087
Body Damage is Cool
|
I don't think SD is trying to assume control, and I don't think anyone needs any slack. This is an information forum. When someone posts a question here (or on any forum), they are asking for opinions. Should the members of the forum only give him opinions that he wants to hear? SD gave his opinions to the gentleman, and they're as valid as anyone else's opinions. Because his opinions differ from yours doesn't mean that he trying to take control.
1977 CJ-7, fiberglass body, AMC 360 w/ headers, DUI ignition, Edelbrock intake and Holley 4150 carb, TF999, Dana 300, 4.56 gears lockers, York air comp, 4" susp lift, 2" body lift, BFG 35" M-T tires, Megashifter, AGR pump & box, REP8000 winch.
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: cbrazor]
#842118
10/23/07 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,817
Body Damage is Cool
|
I agree with what Bob said above in regard to SuperDawg. I also like what SD said about the nutterbypass; his opinion is more than likely the correct response. When we had a more involved moderator, the nutterbypass was a taboo subject, besides being an illegal practice, I suspect. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
94 YJ, SOA, 2-1/2 Alcans, ARB-front, Detroit-Rear, 4.56:1 gears, Oasis Trailhead compressor, 4:1 Terra Lo, 37x12.50x15 SSR's, 8000 lb Ramsey, & etc.
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: Fred Blackstone]
#842119
10/24/07 02:35 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 947
Jeep Moderator
|
When John himself was a mod, we *needed* active moderation on this topic to balance out the perspective. It comes up rarely now, and I can always count on Josh to respond with (IMO) the correct response.
Josh, I especially appreciated you comments on this thread. You provided history/insight I had not heard before (third paragraph). Thanks.
I personally find this topic instructive and illuminating because it helps me understand more about the crap the US manufacturers foisted on the public in response to stricter emmissions standards during the 70s and 80s. Rather than do it right, they took the easy/cheap way out. It still amazes me that carburated vehicles were available until the late 80s... decades(!) after they first appeared on the street.
To me it's more challenging to understand and fix what's there. Simply taking off stuff you don't understand is the easy way out. I've reinstalled all the "smog" equipment on my Wagoneer so that I could legally register it. The old 360 runs about as well as can be expected from a "factory rigged" system. Ultimately EFI is the way to go.
Screw these hybrid junkers and their subsidies... there should be Federal program to retrofit EFI onto our oldies!
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: Berkeley]
#842120
10/24/07 02:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 534
Rock Warrior
|
Speaking of hybrids...I'd keep looking to them to really change 4 wheeling someday not too far from now. Imagine a scaled-down deisel electric with an electric motor powering each individual wheel, independently controlled by computer. ARB's will be a thing of the past....And I will have absolutely no idea what I'm looking at under the hood... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />
97tj, Shaved Ford 9 rear, 4:10's, New 35x12.5 BFG KM2's to test!, Warn x8000i, ARB's, Quick Disco's, Hand Throttle, & it's my DD.
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: DBL_DTY97TJ]
#842121
10/24/07 02:33 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6
OP
Need a Spot
|
so i am guessing that there is no one here that can help!! that for all that posted here. i am still going to try and downsize all the hoses and crap from uder my hood. I don't have the money right now to switch to efi. the little money i have i try and fix my jeep one step at a time. the mc2100 carb swap sounded like a cheaper allternative at the time. i bought it and now i am stuck with it for a bit. Someone was mentioning that the pick-up coil could be the problem. or the ignit modual, i am not sure if the modual is faulty though because the jeep does start when i have it in staock wiring and no nutter.??anyone know how to check the modual and test it??
|
|
Re: nutter issue again!!
[Re: chfbrd]
#842122
10/24/07 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,768
Web Wheeler
|
The pics you have on the other site show a really dirty well used module.. For the price of a new one I'd be trying that.. I doubt the problem being in the oickup.. Big Jim <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />
professional bovine relocation specialist
|
|
|
|