I hope this is not too much off topic.
I am curious why one would swap out the spindle bushing from the early, non-ADD IFS for the roller bearing ADD style?
I'm an ME by training and career, but sometimes overthink the real world. But, the advantage of a bushing is that it will handle far higher load and also tolerate far more contamination than a roller or needle type bearing of the same size. Also, their failure mechanism tends to be gradual over time rather some of the more dramatic failures of a roller bearing. But, bushings have far higher parasitic drag.
My understanding of the bushings versus the rollers/needles in the Toyota IFS is this:
In the first generation, they had manual hubs, so CV's and front diff were not turning as you rolled on pavement. Therefore the bushings at the spindle and the bushings in the diff at the stub axles did not turn.
When they went to ADD, the CV's are now always turning at the spindle. On the passenger side the stub axle is always turning in the direction of the tire. On the drivers side the disconnect lets the stub axle in the diff turn backwards in an open diff, as it is driven through the diff by the passenger side.
So, all four of the bushings in the front end would be seeing constant rotation and therefore their drag would cause a loss in fuel mileage.
They replaced all of the bushings with rollers and needles to decrease the rolling friction in the front end.
If you have hubs, why swap to rollers when you already have bushings that have a higher load capacity and will take far more dirt through the system without failure? Drag does not matter much offroad.
Thoughts?
Best Regards,
Mike Holdner