|
|
|
|
 LandCruiser (91) recomnds/bewares input
#933340
02/26/09 07:08 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 212
OP
Wheeler
|
Im looking at a few land cruisers in the area for sale. Mostly in the early 90's. Any cautions to be aware of?
Any poorly constructed years/engines??
I'm givin up my toy and goin VWesty. Got my Westy and another Toy:)
|
|
|
Re: LandCruiser (91) recomnds/bewares input
[Re: Boyota]
#933341
02/26/09 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,595
Forum Moderator
|
Stay away from 91/92. They have a weaker engine and trans.
95-97 are the most desirable since they have the better engine/trans and available locking front and rear diffs.
|
|
|
Re: LandCruiser (91) recomnds/bewares input
[Re: Adam F]
#933342
03/07/09 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,513
Body Damage is Cool
|
I have a 92 Landcruiser with 145k on it. I may have weaker engine-but have the 4.0 never had headgasket issues. All landcruisers nice -BUT GET POOR GAS MILAGE. I get a from 11-14mpg any kind of driving.
1990 Black Monty LS Over 300K' 1993 Isuzu Rodeo LS 4x4 46k (yes only 46K!)1989 Honda Transalp 600 Africa twin,
|
|
|
|
|
|
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.5934 MB (Peak: 0.6463 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-17 04:07:01 UTCValid HTML 5 and Valid CSS 
