Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148215 05/08/03 06:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 807
W
WomBAT Man Offline OP
Rock Warrior
I returned from rear 5.38 install yesterday and am all grins. For those of you planning on this swap or those just pondering its worth here are some brief, first impressions:

- over continually rolling terrain (cont. 100-300' rises at 4-7%) that (for my truck w/ 4.77s, 33s and 5200lb) 4th gear was routinely needed; yesterday, with a slight headwind I was 5th gear only w/ power to accel.
- 1st gear is not so low that I am skipping it when at a standing start as I thought it might be; but w/ any roll at all 2nd is fine to start
- 4th gear can be used from 25mph and up
- Lo range 1st gear is now (w/ Tera) slower than a slow walk at idle; control is comparably impressive
- all around acceleration is noticably improved
- my impression is that it will pull Snowqualmie at 70 in 5th (power band clearly improves w/ my 3.4 and cam at 67mph), or Lewiston Grade in 4th at 60-65mph

Install w/ ARB was smooth and straight forward, totaling 3.5 hr (less by probably .5hr if subtracting chit chat and photos). Install was via Central 4wd in Spokane, WA. This was full install (ie, included pulling axles/tires).

The WomBAT came w/ 4.56s and I have never changed speedo gears. Based upon mile markers the orig speedo gear/odometer w/ 33s (60% treaded SSRs) w/ 5.38s is just about dead on.

I am, obviously, hoping to get the ft axle done first of next weekàor else I won't be seeing you fine folks! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="images/icons/shocked.gif" /> Are there any other rush installs occuring at present?

s <img border="0" alt="[Pig]" title="" src="graemlins/oink.gif" />


'89 T2, TLo, 3.4L, 2ARBs, 5.38s, 35 MTR's, snorkel by Ace Hardware, spare lollipops for li'l wheelers, anti-aero by devo-lution?and no diet in sight.
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148216 05/08/03 07:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,926
AIR AMIGO Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Yeah, I bet the 5.38's are close to accurate of stock spedo readings. When I got my 5.29's in I used a GPS to check my speedometer, and it was dead on accurate. Finally no more replacing batteries in the speedometer/GPS. :0)

Last minute installs....(looking around innocently) whatever do you mean? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

Redid my Tie Rod ends last night and had a pain getting the pittman arm tierod end changed out. Torch+TriLube+Vice+Long Wrench+BFH+Tie Rod end puller+Pittman arm Puller+One long late night drive for part=No steering play. :0)

I'm currently installing my front ARB/5.29 third member, installing my knuckle rebuild kit, and repacking my front wheel bearings. Then it's off to my alignment. SAS makes things so much easier. :0)

See you in Moab folks!

SEAN-MATT AND I WILL BE IN MOUNTAIN HOME SATURDAY, UNTIL WE LEAVE FOR MOAB MONDAY. COME TO VIC'S! MATT AND I CAN HELP YOU DO THE FRONT.

<small>[ May 08, 2003, 02:06 PM: Message edited by: AIR AMIGO ]</small>


Keith
"AIR AMIGO!" aka 1994 Isuzu Amigo SAS with Toyota axles, 5.29's, dual ARB's, IROK's, WARN HS9500 winch, and etc.
Pacific NW Isuzu Off-Roaders
Timber Tamers #172
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148217 05/08/03 08:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 807
W
WomBAT Man Offline OP
Rock Warrior
Yep, it is going to take some getting used to to look at the speedo and not do calc's to figure how much I am speedingàer, I mean how fast I am going. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" />

I won't see you guys that soon, but thanks for the offer. Why not drive over here tonight and we can do it tomorrow?! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

What do you have against steering play? Sounds like a good Stanley Kubrick film title: "Dr. StrangeZu: Or how I came to love SAS steering." <img border="0" alt="[Nerd]" title="" src="graemlins/nerd.gif" />

s <img border="0" alt="[Rat]" title="" src="graemlins/rodent.gif" />


'89 T2, TLo, 3.4L, 2ARBs, 5.38s, 35 MTR's, snorkel by Ace Hardware, spare lollipops for li'l wheelers, anti-aero by devo-lution?and no diet in sight.
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148218 05/08/03 10:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,926
AIR AMIGO Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Okay lunch time/wrenching break. The front axle has been dissasembled. When i finish lunch I go start the cleaning process before reassembely.
Already have the 2nd ARB solenoid wired up, just got to plum the blue line to the front. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

I'm sure I'm crazy enough, to consider driving to Moscow, ID tonight to help you at first light...however, I have to head to Bellingham tonight. I'm picking up a axle for someone at Moab Zu Zoo VI. After I go to Bellingham tonight, Matt G. and I are testing our rigs in the Sultan Basin ORV area.

Don't think I should tempt the wheeling gods by doing a long distance drive, wheel, and then do a long distance drive without a good visual inspection in daylight.

The rest of my caravan can't leave till Friday night.

hmmmm.....how far is Moscow, ID from I-84?


Keith
"AIR AMIGO!" aka 1994 Isuzu Amigo SAS with Toyota axles, 5.29's, dual ARB's, IROK's, WARN HS9500 winch, and etc.
Pacific NW Isuzu Off-Roaders
Timber Tamers #172
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148219 05/12/03 03:20 AM
Anonymous
Unregistered
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by AIR AMIGO:
<strong>Yeah, I bet the 5.38's are close to accurate of stock spedo readings. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">I have a '96 Trooper with "33s and auto tranny. From previous post I was under the impression that the 5.38s would be too low and over rev the engine on the interestate. Is there that much difference in stock tire size bettwen a 1st gen and a 2nd gen?

Adam

Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148220 05/12/03 09:27 AM
Anonymous
Unregistered
The larger wheels will make a vehicle rev lower at higher speed than a vehicle with stock wheels, therefor the speedo's going to read lower than the actual speed and the lower gears are going to do the opposite, increasing rpms and thereby increasing torque. These two cancel each other out when you're running 35s or so and you end up with a speedo that reads as acurate as stock instead of over-reving your engine as it would do if you ran it with stock 245/75 tires or what have you. I think WomBAT and Air Amigo are both 5 speed manuals too which may or may not make a difference in what you're talking about. I hope that helps and wasn't just a bunch of useless rambling <img border="0" alt="[Hillbilly]" title="" src="graemlins/notooth.gif" /> .

Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148221 05/13/03 05:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 807
W
WomBAT Man Offline OP
Rock Warrior
Some of your folks w/ newer rigs will have to correct me, but I was thinking your stock tire was 30-31" (I know it is metric though). Ours was 29 (4.56 gears) and some like myself found and installed factory option gears (4.77) for our 31, then 32, then 33" tires.

Current combo is sweet unless you want to run over 75mph, then tach is too high. Not sure I want to drive that fast sitting that high, but w/ a newer rig you might. At least if NV or MT are your driving areas.

I would not though want to run 32s w/ my set of gears and motor. That would be too low (though my SSRs are probably worn to that now).

s <img border="0" alt="[Pig]" title="" src="graemlins/oink.gif" />


'89 T2, TLo, 3.4L, 2ARBs, 5.38s, 35 MTR's, snorkel by Ace Hardware, spare lollipops for li'l wheelers, anti-aero by devo-lution?and no diet in sight.
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148222 05/13/03 06:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 945
maxwell417 Offline
Rock Warrior
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">I have a '96 Trooper with "33s and auto tranny. From previous post I was under the impression that the 5.38s would be too low and over rev the engine on the interestate. Is there that much difference in stock tire size bettwen a 1st gen and a 2nd gen?

Adam</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">I'm pretty sure all 4L30E transmissions have .72 overdrive. 5.38 gears + 33's = 2960 rpm's @ 75mph vs 4.55 + 33's = 2500rpm @ 75mph, by my calculations.

My Trooper can cruise all day easy at 3000 rpm.


Curt B 89RS Calmini Header Delta Cam 33x10.5 BFG MTs & 90 Trooper 3.4 v6, SAS D44 ARB/Hobart 5.38s 35s my pictures
Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148223 05/13/03 11:26 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans"><strong>I'm pretty sure all 4L30E transmissions have .72 overdrive. 5.38 gears + 33's = 2960 rpm's @ 75mph vs 4.55 + 33's = 2500rpm @ 75mph, by my calculations.

My Trooper can cruise all day easy at 3000 rpm.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Thats encouraging news. In my calculating last night i had down .89 for the ratio, which was giving me 3656 rpm at 75mph <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="images/icons/shocked.gif" /> . Given that the speed limit is only 70 mph <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> , 2950 rpm at 75 is not bad at all. My '88 runs 3000 at 70, stock.

Adam

Re: 5.38s -- first impressions (rear) #148224 05/14/03 06:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 807
W
WomBAT Man Offline OP
Rock Warrior
Front ARB and 5.38s went in yesterday. No issues arose, and the spacer fit perfectly. Some folks may have seen this as a marginal fix for the issue, however I can assure you it is stoutly constructed and the machine was on the money. Few spacers were actually needed as the fit was snug, but setup went AOK.

For those planning this and wanting $ comparisons, I took in a spare ft axle (Air Amigo's old center section) and had the install done on that. Labor was $130. If I had pulled the 3rd member and done all the cleanup/resealing myself I would've shaved another 15-30min.

Install should be in a week or so. BTW, for you folks doing this don't forget to extend your axle breather line if you have not done so already. It wil be staring at you, and there's no reason to not do it now if you want a higher intake/exhaust point.

s <img border="0" alt="[Rat]" title="" src="graemlins/rodent.gif" />


'89 T2, TLo, 3.4L, 2ARBs, 5.38s, 35 MTR's, snorkel by Ace Hardware, spare lollipops for li'l wheelers, anti-aero by devo-lution?and no diet in sight.
Page 1 of 2 1 2







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6427 MB (Peak: 0.7663 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-07 04:20:09 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS