|
|
|
|
4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
#553557
01/17/05 03:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 61
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
I was wondering if anyone could comment on the 2.7 four cylinder engine that is in the 2003 4X4 Tacoma. There are a lot of 4 cyl 22RE fans on this site... is this engine an improvement? Looking at buying this truck, or should I go with a V6 on this year?
Thanks
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: beechdriver]
#553558
01/17/05 04:34 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,192
Toyota Moderator
|
Either motor found in the Tacoma is a good choice. The 2.7L 4 cylinder makes considerably more power than the 22RE and still gets good mileage. I have not heard about any serious issues with these motors and would not hesitate to buy one.
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: beechdriver]
#553559
01/17/05 05:27 PM
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,056
Body Damage is Cool
|
I would not hesitate to purchase the 4 cylinder. If I were in the market for a Tacoma that is the motor I would be looking for. You can't go wrong with either motor though.
John Smith 79 FJ40 87 StdCab w/22R TLCA# 9074
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: John Smith]
#553560
01/17/05 06:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 61
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
What's the gas mileage on this engine?
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: beechdriver]
#553561
01/18/05 12:48 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 69
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
I bought a creampuff 2002 2.7 5sp Extracab 4WD last year with 12K miles. The six is great Im sure, but I do everything I want with the four.
Strickly stop and go driving/around town, I see 19-21. Once out on the freeway though, steady 65-70, I get 23-24, and 50-60, I see 24-25, and these numbers are consistant. I track my mileage with every fillup. Im also a slow starter from stops, and easy on the accelerator.
'02 Taco 4x4 X-cab, joins my '68 Land Cruiser bought back in '70 which is still going strong. Me at: [url=http://redwoods-and-glaciers.spaces.live.com/
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: beechdriver]
#553562
01/19/05 11:01 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 131
Wheeler
|
The 4 cyl 2.7l is a tried and true performer.
02 Tacoma Xcb 4x4, runnin 32"s, 2.5" Daystar spacers, 1.5" Downey HD shackles, AOR sliders, SkidRow Tcase skid, 20# CO2 setup
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: Stock02]
#553563
01/19/05 01:47 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I echo cctk2's comments. My mileage is almost identical on my '95. I have used it to haul a ton of sand and gravel up a 6% climb for over three miles in 3rd gear at over 40 MPH. It does tend to over heat in summer with those loads, but I think it's a problem with the radiator, which I plan to have checked soon. It's not a big problem now. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
#553564
01/19/05 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,986
Toyota Section Staffer
|
The 2.7 is nice, and adequate. The 3.4 is nicer, and more adequate. Mileage is not significantly different between them, and the 3.4 timing belt is easier to change, if more often required (90K miles, though I understand the newer designs' service interval is 120K. Check with your dealer). Since the water pump often is near its life at the same time though, you would be in there anyway to change it, so something to consider.
-Bill '87 4Runner w/ '96 5VZ-FE, 'Red Chili II' '97 Taco XtraCab 3RZ-FE, 'BlackBean' TLCA # 13257, Rising Sun 4x4 Club Land Use Coordinator "He who stops being better stops being good." -Oliver Cromwell
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: beechdriver]
#553565
01/19/05 11:46 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The 2.7 is ok. Does struggle a bit maintaining 60 or so MPH going up a hill.You gotta push down on the pedal and sometimes hit passing gear in an auto. The gas mileage between the 2.7 and the 3.4 difference is I believe only 1-2 MPG. I'd go 3.4L.
Last edited by redvet; 01/19/05 11:48 PM.
|
|
Re: 4 cylinder on a 2003 Tacoma... comments?
[Re: Red_Chili]
#553566
01/20/05 09:41 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
The timing belt on 3.4 is easier to change because the 2.7 has a chain..... which may last up too 200K. I have 99 2.7 with supercharger, It had plenty of power for me before SC, but wanted more!! I wouldnt go with the 2.4 yota, but stand behind the 2.7. Is this truck and extended cab? I have standard cab model.
|
|
|
|
|
|