|
|
Re: Stock pipes are best
[Re: H2O_MAN]
#632142
08/02/05 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 353
Mudrunner
|
I saw this post and was surprised not to see a 2.25" recommendation. When I originally got my TRD header and cat-back, the TRD tech/engineer I spoke with said the 2.5" option was for non-header applications or for when they also installed the supercharger. I explained that I pulled a 3500# boat and didn't want to lose ANY low-end torque. He insisted that I get the 2.25" cat-back in combination with their header to keep the torque curve similar to stock. The most obvious benefit after the upgrade was that a previous flat-spot in second gear on my automatic-equipped truck seem to be replaced by much better acceleration. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" /> Brew
98 T100 SR5 4x4 3.4L auto, TRD Goodies, Bilsteins, engine/TC skids, 2" body/d.train lifts, F/R ARBs, 4.56 R&Ps, Aisin hubs, 255/85R16 Dunlop Rover RVXTs (street), 16x7 +8mm offset wheels, custom bumpers, Warn M8000, Master-pull synth. line
|
|
Re: Stock pipes are best
[Re: H2O_MAN]
#632143
08/03/05 02:48 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,489
OP
Body Damage is Cool
|
Ordered today, $132 with tax, ill have to modify the flange a bit to hook up with my Cat...but otherwise im excited about it...
97 FZJ80, Stock, Factory Lockers.
|
|
Re: Stock pipes are best
[Re: Brew]
#632144
08/03/05 11:00 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 82
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Brew and others,
So what would you recommend for one who doesn't have headers and does have a SC? Also, I'm curious if you'd recommend headers along with the SC to help it breathe? IOW, What would be the best combination for a 3.4L T with a SC?
<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/evil.gif" alt="" />
*95 T100, 4WD, EXTCAB, SR5, 5spd, 2.5 mm bored throttle body, Kumho Venture MT, Bilstein HD, TRD SC, URD Performance Upgrade Kit, 2" body lift, TRD headers coming soon *06 Toyota Rav4 269HP 4wd V6
Amsoil in all
|
|
Re: Stock pipes are best
[Re: wizardz]
#632145
08/04/05 02:45 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 353
Mudrunner
|
From what I've heard you need the headers and can open it up to 2.5". The SC will give you plenty of low-end. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" /> However if I wanted maximum grunt, I'd probably stay with 2.25" and the header. Brew <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
p.s. - The only guy to do any dyno testing was William Gabay down in Louisville, KY. He bought my wheels and tires so I know he still checks the boards. Hey William, what do you think?
98 T100 SR5 4x4 3.4L auto, TRD Goodies, Bilsteins, engine/TC skids, 2" body/d.train lifts, F/R ARBs, 4.56 R&Ps, Aisin hubs, 255/85R16 Dunlop Rover RVXTs (street), 16x7 +8mm offset wheels, custom bumpers, Warn M8000, Master-pull synth. line
|
|
Re: Stock pipes are best
[Re: Brew]
#632146
08/06/05 12:23 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21
Need a Spot
|
I'm currently running JBA headers stock pipes and a reverse flow turbo muffler (Dyno max clone). I pulled the fuse for the ECM after installation and after a hundred miles or so of driving am very impressed with the difference. So impressed I'm in the middle of installing LSD to help with the spinning tires. The exhaust is a nice low berble. I had a bad seal where the stearing shaft went through the fire wall. I was surprised at the woosh sound the new headers produced. So much so I checked a couple of times thinking it was an exhaust leak. I fixed the seal and the THHHHHHHHHH sound is all but gone.
|
|
|
|