|
|
engine compatibility?
#653403
10/05/05 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 178
OP
Wheeler
|
searched but couldn't find an answer on the forum.
Will a 3.0 from an 89 work in a 1995 3.0?
1989 Montero LS (sold) 1994 Cherokee Country bone stock
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: v6lsmonty]
#653404
10/05/05 09:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
Web Wheeler
|
Maybe - maybe not. A while back when looking at 3.5L swap potential, I think we pretty much determined that there was a block change in the 6G72 somewhere along about '94 or '95. I don't know what the difference is (if any), but I think it may have been in the area of the converter housing bolt pattern.
Frank
'89 [color:"white"]G-Raider[color:"white"] [color:"black"]Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 172k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, Lifeline AGM, Rust-Oleum
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: FrankR]
#653405
10/05/05 09:36 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 178
OP
Wheeler
|
yeah, also judging from the top end the electrical is highly modified, probably not practical. I was hoping an intake swap would do it. Although I have to say, I have grown partially to the brick on wheels look.
1989 Montero LS (sold) 1994 Cherokee Country bone stock
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: v6lsmonty]
#653406
10/05/05 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,356
Trail Leader
|
Bolck, or whole engine? You are definitely looking at different heads. The 95 is 24V. Also no dizzy in the 95. And then there's the lesser HP of the 12V. All in all I wouldn't consider the swap. The 24V in general is rigged more like the 3.5L it looks like.
Maybe the blocks can be swapped for a rebuild project...???
Big Truck: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 5-Spd drive line in hand! Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 65k Daughter's: 06 Eclipse, Keeping it Mitsu! FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: v6lsmonty]
#653407
10/05/05 11:37 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 194
Wheeler
|
I was looking through the part numbers for rebuild kits on the site where I got mine and it doesn't show a 12v 6g72 in the montero in 95 only the 24v... But it does show a lot of interchangability with the 94 12v.. but that doesn't mean the bell housing bolts and other bolt holes are the same... Topline mitsu rebuild kits Custom mitsu rebuild kitsI got the CR183EK on the custom page.
Last edited by johnpsz; 10/05/05 11:44 PM.
John Pszenyczniak 67 Mustang Coupe 95 Firebird Formula 05 Ram hemi 4x4 91 Montero RS LWB w/ 320k miles before rebuild, 900 down and its still kicking!!!
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: johnpsz]
#653408
10/06/05 12:05 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,160
Web Wheeler
|
The truck would not even move with that engine. The slowest Montero ever produced was the 92-93 3.0 with almost 10HP more then the 89. With the 89 engine in the 95, Volkswagon buses would be passing you! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/scared.gif" alt="" />
1996 SR From the Area 51 Skunk Works. 37"BFG Tires, 5" lift, Rock Track 4:1 Case, Tom Woods Drive Shafts, Oasis Air, Front ARB, lifted gas tank, T-max winch and lots of stuff that cost too much.
|
|
Re: engine compatibility?
[Re: v6lsmonty]
#653409
10/06/05 04:18 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 568
Rock Warrior
|
From the posts above, it sounds like you have the 24V engine. However, IF it is a 12V, it will probably work. I recently put an engine from a '91 (Gen I) into a '92 (Gen II), complete from oil pan to valve covers. I have to swap the intake manifolds so that the upper & lower Gen II manifold stayed in the Gen II truck. I've been driving it now for several months.
90 LWB Montero, 270k, 265/75R16, 16x8 ARE Bajas, Budget Lift, Towbar, Aux Brakes (towed with camper), Jotto Desk, remote oil filter 92 bone stock base model beater Parting out 4 more
|
|
|
|