|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: nocturnalVX]
#670259
12/01/05 12:16 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,016
Isuzu Moderator
|
Gil, you know I love your VX... but I'm still going to have to rate a Rubicon as more off-road capable. I'd rate a Rubicon are more off-road capable than the Amigo as well, and I have an ARB out back and Tera Lows. Its hard to argue with lockers f/r and a 4:1 t-case.
The Rubi in that pic got hung up on his front differential on the high point between the two ruts. You and I have an advantage on that part of the trail because of the IFS... the center differential is tucked up higher, so we are less likely to get high-centered on it. Areas where ground clearance between the tires is key may allow us to show up a Rubi now and again. But as far as overall stock capability, IMHO they've got it. I still say we can run stock to stock with any other Jeep out there, though.
All statements are strictly the opinion of the author and may not reflect the thoughts and opinions of MWIOR as an organization, its other members, or affiliates <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />
Sean Strawmyer Back and ready to rock...... crawl. From Indiana or surrounding states and interested in wheelin'? Check out www.mwior.com
|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: strawmyers]
#670260
12/01/05 01:05 AM
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 96
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
... I'm still going to have to rate a Rubicon as more off-road capable. I'd rate a Rubicon are more off-road capable than the Amigo as well, and I have an ARB out back and Tera Lows. Its hard to argue with lockers f/r and a 4:1 t-case. There you go... bringing FACTS into this. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/nana.gif" alt="" /> [qoute]The Rubi in that pic got hung up on his front differential on the high point between the two ruts. You and I have an advantage on that part of the trail because of the IFS...[/quote] Shhhhh! Don't give away our secrets! I still say we can run stock to stock with any other Jeep out there, though. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" /> All statements are strictly the opinion of the author and may not reflect the thoughts and opinions of MWIOR as an organization, its other members, or affiliates <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> LMAO
Last edited by nocturnalVX; 12/01/05 01:10 AM.
|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: strawmyers]
#670261
12/01/05 01:06 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,074
Body Damage is Cool
|
By Paddler, in a different post: It all comes down to personal preference and what terrian you normally wheel on. I have both an IFS (Passport) and a solid axle (unlimited Rubicon), everything being equal minus the axle difference, neither will out do the other. I would agree with that. I've done a bit of wheeling with a stock Rubicon when my Rodeo was on 33s and only rear locker, and I always outdid him. Now he's got a 3.5" OME lift and swaybar disco's, and its almost even. There are spots where either rig has an advantage. My tires (Trxus and the old Cooper STTs) always give a better bite than the stock MT/Rs. Especially when it gets muddy. When he gets some better tires, I'd say its even. Now if you were to compare a Rubicon Wrangler to a theoretical Rubicon edition Amigo. That would be really interesting, I'd like to see that match up.
|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: Rodeo Guy]
#670262
12/01/05 04:39 AM
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,628
Body Damage is Cool
|
I'm surprised your Trxus out do the MT/R's. I believe the MT/R's for the first 10,000 to 15,000 miles are unbeatable. After that they suck. Back to the original issue. I'm sure that it's not as pronounced on a regular TJ but that darn center belly pan on the unlimited sure gets you hung up alot. It definitely needs the 3" lift at a minimum. I also never, ever go back to unslectable lockers afetr having this thing. Selectable ROCKS!!! BTW, the Passport is for sale in the for sale section.
Last edited by Paddler; 12/01/05 04:40 AM.
1995 Honda Passport; Some people wait a life time for their ship to sail in, while others simple grab the oars and begin paddling Yours truely http://www.zutah.com
|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: Paddler]
#670263
12/01/05 05:13 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,074
Body Damage is Cool
|
I'm surprised your Trxus out do the MT/R's. I believe the MT/R's for the first 10,000 to 15,000 miles are unbeatable. After that they suck. IMO, MT/r's are more of a "west coast" tire. They are awesome in rock, but they are not as hot in the mud. I know a number of guys that were quite displeased w/ perfromance of the 31-35" MT/r's (steep hills w/ mud). For some reason, guys w/ 37" MT/rs seem to better in mud. ON the Rubicon, I think it flat out smokes any other mass market vehicle (isuzu or other). A rubicon on 35s is easily built and nearly unstoppable. Nothing else compares!
Mark-95Trooper,fr LockRight,rr LSD,5spd,TeraLow,Indy tierods&QD sways,CO2, RS9000Xs,OME912&2.5"spacers,1"BL,ARB w/Warn M8000,OBT rear bumper&sliders. Pics indy4x
|
|
Re: Isuzu Amigo vs. Jeep Wrangler
[Re: Wareagle]
#670264
12/01/05 07:24 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,074
Body Damage is Cool
|
Yep I've seen MT/Rs work well in rocks, but that ain't what we got local. Its all trails, hills, stream crossings, and mud. And the mt/r's pack up easily.
We have noticed the low hanging transfercase skid. He wants to get the nth degree tucker, but its $$$.
|
|
|
|