Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
What do I want? #698253 02/19/06 04:44 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 136
Tycer Offline OP
Wheeler
I am getting rid of my 1989 Montero in favor for something a little more user friendly and have decided on a early model 4runner. What is the best thing to look for? Do I want a older 1985 SAS or a IFS? From what I have read I cannot put much of a bigger engine in a SAS. My goal is to have something that I can easily run 33+" tires, easily modified, potential of a v8 conversion, has available accessories, enough power to get me to the ski resort, is plenty 4wd capable or can modified to do it, and would like to have the removable top(but not mandatory). I would appreciate any help/suggestions so I can begin my search.


* * MY 1993 JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE * * RockKrawler Long Arm Lift, 8" of total Lift, Garvin Wilderness Rack, Hella Lights, 285/75r16 Firestone Destination tires.
Re: What do I want? [Re: Tycer] #698254 02/19/06 06:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,595
Adam F Offline
Forum Moderator
From your requirements, ANY 4Runner will do the job.

With the right skills, time, and money, you can put any engine in any car. No V8 will just drop right in though.

All you need is IFS. It will ride much smoother than a solid axle and is plenty capable for what you describe.

I'd recommend a 1986-1989 4Runner. They have the removeable top. 4cy was standard up until 88/89, where you could get the V6. Both motors are great. Neither motor is a speed demon, but they will get you where you need to go. The 6cy has a little more pep than the 4cy. 4cy is easier to work on than the 6. 4cy motors usually meet their death from either a broken timing chain or being overheated. 6cy meet their death from a blown headgasket. Pick your poison. But stick with a manual trans, auto trans sucks up the power on these motors.

Or if you have the $$$, get yourself a 1996-2002 4Runner. They have a more comfortable suspension, interior, and more power with the v6. But no removeable top.

Any other questions just ask.


88 4R, 350 V8, R150 5 speed Sold <...uot; />
97 4R, stock, daily driver
98 Sienna, kid and dog hauler, wife's ride
Re: What do I want? [Re: Tycer] #698255 02/20/06 11:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,681
fourwd1 Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Any of the 1st gen (84-89) 4Runners will do what you want, but the 85+ 4 cylinders are EFI and have a little more power. The 3.0 V6 (aka the 3.slow) has only a little more power, and is trouble prone.

As for the V8 swap, you actually have more clearance for the oil pan with the SAS (84-85) and it's easier to beef up that suspension to handle the V8's weight.


- seen in FOUR WHEELER mag July 2006 & OFF-ROAD mag Feb 2007 -
'84 4Runner ARBed 5.29s F&R,4.7 & 2.28 t-cases,hy-steer,BudBuilt skid,30spl Longs,36" TSLs,Chevys

'83 P/U, Buick 231 V6,Holley 4 bbl,Weiand intake,Downey headers,TH350 w/700R4 gearset

Moderated by  4x4Wire, Adam F, Dandeman, kewlynx 







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.005s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.5942 MB (Peak: 0.6495 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-05-30 01:06:30 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS