Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
engine compatibility #1016607 12/31/10 02:57 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 41
Thor Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
I saw a post where someone was putting a Chevy Engine in a 2.6. Can anyone give me a list of all compatible engines for the four cylinder. particularly mine....89 mitsu mon 2.6. I am thinking about putting a new 2.6 in, but the head issue...always busting...it just pisses me off..is the Chevy equivalent better or any other engine?


89 Montero, 2.6L 4cylinder. G54B
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Thor] #1016608 12/31/10 04:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,348
Mudraider Offline
Body Damage is Cool
it's not that it is compatible. it is what the person made fit

Re: engine compatibility [Re: Thor] #1016609 12/31/10 04:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
off-roader Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
most 2.6 engine swaps aren't simple swaps unless you're putting in the same engine.

there's the 2.6 Turbo swap (from starion conquest) that requires installing and wiring the mitsu ECU or aftermarket engine management system.

there's the 4.3L chevy v6 from an s-10 blazer. No simple task. In addition to adding the engine management system you also need to fab engine mounts, and chevy tranny and mounts.

there are other more complex swaps in addition to these two.

what's your skill level and tool accessibility?


Off Roader
98 Montero with the Winter Package
89 Montero minty clean and reserved for overlanding trips or Cars and Coffee events
96SR (3.15:1 xcase, 35's) gone to the rust gods
96SR Build Up Thread
Old web page
Old web page
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Thor] #1016610 12/31/10 07:40 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,132
K
Kevin C Offline
Trail Leader
****
What is your history with losing cylinder heads? Many have been able to replace the head and gotten good results with a bit of TLC. I run between 10 and 15 PSI of boost on a 2.6 and have not had any head problems for more than 10 years.

It can be done..


87 Turbo Intercooled Raider, roller cam, torsen rear diff, LSD front diff, lockup auto with modified converter, V6 brakes, low transfer case gears...
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Thor] #1016611 12/31/10 10:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 445
A
airbats801 Offline
Mudrunner
frankly there is no head problem if your cooling system is good and you actually followed factory instructions in installing a had. 22 year old brass radiators dont tend to work very good these days.

I have lsot a hg or head in 9 years. And thats all turbo engines. I have blown out a ringland on a cheap set of pistons though. g54b is a great engine if you keep up on it, and will last a long long time.

Last edited by airbats801; 12/31/10 10:06 AM.

8 Starion SHP, 87 mitsubishi van, , 81 galant g54bt, 78 lancer g54bt, 1965 Mitsubishi Debonair Deluxe
87 swb montero offroad pkg goin g54bt with sr locker 33x12.5 dual bouncy.
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Mudraider] #1016612 12/31/10 12:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 45
S
Spook Offline
Getting the Wheeling Fever
As to the Chevy V6, if a 4.3 fits, then likely the 4.0 would too and given a choice, go with the 4.0! The 4.3 is cursed from top to bottom.

Re: engine compatibility [Re: off-roader] #1016613 12/31/10 05:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,211
JohnnyBfromPeoria Offline
Trail Leader
*****
A 2.4l swap gets you fuel injection and a bit more overall power. It'll bolt right up to a KM-148 auto, too. Don't know about compatability with a KM-145 manual, though.

For my '86, being that it's a narrow block 2.6 with the 3-speed auto, I'd have to find a 2.0l. Instead I'm leaning toward a 2.4 and swapping in a KM-148 with its transfer case and the appropriate drive shafts.

Naturally, I'll have to add an electric fuel pump as well.

I'm only going to go ahead with this swap because the parts are available and it's pretty straightforward. The turbo 2.6 is the ultimate...again...just make sure your radiator is in top shape, get a factory fan clutch, good water pump and if you're needing a new head, use the turbo head gasket and follow the instructions by FastEddy and others regarding tapping/chasing the head bolt holes, using new head bolts, etc. I'm partial to Clearwater non-jet-valve hydraulic heads myself, too.

John B.


'87 Raider 2.6 Turbo Auto, Under Construction
'95 Montero SR, 35x12.5/15 BFG M/T KM-2's, Rock sliders, Qtr panel chop, gas tank lift, 2" BL, Aisins, 5.29s
'95 Pajero Mini
'98 Montero Winter Ed.
'04 Cadillac XLR
'03 Kawasaki ZRX1200R
'60 Ford Falcon 4Dr
Re: engine compatibility [Re: JohnnyBfromPeoria] #1016614 12/31/10 05:37 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,132
K
Kevin C Offline
Trail Leader
****
One thing that gets overlooked is repairing engines that have had a severe overheat. This can happen on any engine but is worse on one with aluminum heads.

As the engine warms up, the head expands and the force on the head bolts increases. The hotter the engine, the greater the increase. Since aluminum expands more than iron, Aluminum head engines have a much larger increase.

On an overheat the force gets so high the the gasket takes a permanent set and or the head bolts stretch. The head bolt washers can also take a set into the head.

The worse case is the block also cracks through the deck. If it happens, it will be on the exhaust side of the engine. Two factors, one the higher forces and secondly the block is losing strength as it gets hot.

Once you have a crack in the block the fastener would still hold, but the forces on the gasket will not be even. Those motors will continue to lose gaskets, no t matter what you do until the block gets changes.

This is not a 2.6 only problem, it can happen to any engine.

The other problem is some engines get put together with out of true deck surfaces.

All head gaskets have a life span. They will only last so many heat cycles before they fail. The greater the operating temperature range and the greater the expansion difference between the head and the block the more the gasket gets stressed. As the head expands and contracts the gasket lest the head slide along the deck surface.

This will eventually fail the gasket. how long should the gasket last. Reasonable is it should make it to 150,000 miles. Overheating will make sure you dont make it. Also some casting will have residual stresses in them that relax over time. This causes the head to warp over time. The uneven clamping pressure will get fail the gasket. Those are the motors that lose a gasket at 60,000 even when the motor was never overheated.

It does happen, but its not all that common. In general, as others have pointed out, it not that hard to have put together a 2.6 that stays together.

In some ways they did get a bad rep based on problems, but the problems are not as bad as they have been made out to be.

Kevin


87 Turbo Intercooled Raider, roller cam, torsen rear diff, LSD front diff, lockup auto with modified converter, V6 brakes, low transfer case gears...
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Kevin C] #1016615 01/01/11 12:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,348
Mudraider Offline
Body Damage is Cool
I wasaway from the 2.6 for 15+ plus years while doing the military thing, and i picked up this Raider that a kid had been driving 50+ plus miles each way to Jacksonville without overdrive, and have not had any problems with the engine itself. We used to race the G54B, running Weber DCOE on custom manifolds, lots oof compression and RPM's, never had problems. Like everyone has said, we always used new head bolts and Mitsubishi head gaskets, and the worked well. I like mine a lot, it is just underpowered with the 35's on it. I know when I did my 350 swap into my S-10, it was so much more fun to drive. this is a really great platform to build on, maybe a good think thru on rebuilding your 2.6 completely might not be a bad thing.


89 SWB, V-6 5SPD, OME Shocks, 16.5X37's, 2"BL, SR axle, Gen2 brakes, Lincoln w/Superwinch
Re: engine compatibility [Re: Thor] #1016616 01/10/11 03:19 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 584
TobyB Offline
Rock Warrior
If you can get away from the air injection (jet) valve,
I've never had trouble.
First head lasted 175k and then ate a jet valve.
Second head (no valve) outlasted me- I went to a
v6 with all it's own issues...

t


'89 V6 4dr- '4- Doris'
Page 1 of 2 1 2







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 3.477s Queries: 16 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6434 MB (Peak: 0.7704 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-07 09:04:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS