4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision

4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision [Re: Bernoulli] #1041534 02/07/12 01:11 AM

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 441

Petoskey, Michiagan

TainterRacing Offline

Mudrunner

I have had both 2.6N/A and the turbo 2.6 and 2 v6's 3.0. I would say what the others have said the 3.0 will be a lot less work. With that said the Turbo 2.6 has more power hands down but to get it running from a good running 2.6 N/A it will run you about 1.5k-2k or so.

1997 Montero LS with a motor swap a 1990 V6 12valve ported heads full 2.5in Ex I run stock tire size for Daily use, off road have 33x12.5 working on going trubo.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	JoeyB	02/06/12 10:59 PM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	seely	02/06/12 11:18 PM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	spencevans	02/06/12 11:35 PM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	Bernoulli	02/07/12 12:23 AM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	TainterRacing	02/07/12 01:11 AM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	rxinhed	02/07/12 03:47 AM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	KrzyDav	02/07/12 05:47 AM
Re: 4 vs. 6; buying another Raider...engine decision	JoeyB	02/07/12 06:56 PM

Moderated by 4x4Wire, Macka, Mudraider, off-roader, PHIL_, rxinhed

Hop To

4x4Wire Social: