Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 sport V6 compatibility #1052742 10/19/12 02:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Bhealy Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
Hey all! Long time no talk, last time involved many engine and/or tire questions and I can't thank you all enough for the input, it has kept me away (without problems <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/nana.gif" alt="" />) until now...

SO, title says it all. I have the opportunity to pick up a 89 V6 donor vehicle, but beyond the motor, tranny, and fuel tank are most parts interchangeable? I've done some archive digging but I'd like a definite answer before taking the plunge and acquiring a good ol' car-on-blocks lawn ornament.

Things I'm looking to take:
1) Rear window (my defroster elements are toast)
2) Front window
3) Bumpers/ various paneling
4) Bouncy seat! Why can't I have two up front?
5) Interior: carpet, rear seat, dash
6) Unforeseen odds and ends that will go bunk eventually

Keep in mind I will soon make available parts for any of you guys as well, all I ask is some pocket change and shipping from the last frontier as I'm in AK now <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/patriot.gif" alt="" />

Last edited by Bhealy; 10/19/12 02:56 AM.

87' Raider: off road package, rebuilt engine with (new) stock tires and alloy wheels but otherwise original.
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: Bhealy] #1052743 10/19/12 03:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,458
rxinhed Offline
Trail Leader
*****
There are natural differences between the 4- and 6-cylinder models. The 89 SWB/LWB will have a funny little set of mounts from the body to frame in the rear fenderwells. The biggest diff will be the engine/trans and things directly related, bolted to, and attached. The body, interior, etc. have nuance differences. The 89 SWB may have rear 3-point seat belts, some vertical bars inside the rear window, rear interior panels have a hole for the seat belt retractors, speaker covers are not the same but can be used. The 89 most likely has a rear wiper delay not found on the 87. The rear frame crossmember is difference to accommodate the larger tank and the bumper mounts are accordingly different.

I have not had a V6 SWB, but the interior dome light could be different. Comments about are based upon numerous LWB and 4-cyl SWB models I've parted out, or from wrecking yard forays. Buy the V6 and get larger front brakes, too!

Russell


1987 Raider - Roxy
1988 Mighty Max 2.6L Turbo - Pearl
1997 Mountaineer V8 - Freddy
2000 Excursion V10 - Freya
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: rxinhed] #1052744 10/19/12 04:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Bhealy Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
What would you consider a fair price for a car in this Un-drivable condition, knowing I won't be able to use a lot of the major components and one day need (possibly pay) to salvage the remainder?


87' Raider: off road package, rebuilt engine with (new) stock tires and alloy wheels but otherwise original.
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: Bhealy] #1052745 10/19/12 05:19 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,356
MontyMcV Offline
Trail Leader
Non-running and not readily fixable, scrap weight down were would be ~$400. My cheapest non-running donor was $50 and the most was @250, with a rebuilt tranny in it. Those are the only two I have bought.

Do the interiors match between yours? The 88-89 dashboards can handle a more standard speaker. Also, the guage faces light up much better.


Big Truck: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 5-Spd drive line in hand!
Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top
Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 65k
Daughter's: 06 Eclipse, Keeping it Mitsu!
FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: MontyMcV] #1052746 10/19/12 07:17 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Bhealy Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
Quote

Do the interiors match between yours?


When I go to check it out I'll try to see, but beyond eyeballing it I have no idea.


87' Raider: off road package, rebuilt engine with (new) stock tires and alloy wheels but otherwise original.
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: Bhealy] #1052747 10/19/12 09:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,356
MontyMcV Offline
Trail Leader
They will match as far as bolting in. I meant match is color. The 87 has the long and tall 3x7 or whatever speaker spots. The 88+ are more like 4x6. Arguably easier to mount in your doors, but if you didn't want to do that, the 87 can be retro'd with a later dash.


Big Truck: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 5-Spd drive line in hand!
Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top
Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 65k
Daughter's: 06 Eclipse, Keeping it Mitsu!
FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: MontyMcV] #1052748 10/19/12 09:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
off-roader Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
Quote
They will match as far as bolting in. I meant match is color. The 87 has the long and tall 3x7 or whatever speaker spots. The 88+ are more like 4x6. Arguably easier to mount in your doors, but if you didn't want to do that, the 87 can be retro'd with a later dash.


If you mount speakers in doors, be careful about the depth/size magnet you install since it can easily interfere with the window.

HTH.


Off Roader
98 Montero with the Winter Package
89 Montero minty clean and reserved for overlanding trips or Cars and Coffee events
96SR (3.15:1 xcase, 35's) gone to the rust gods
96SR Build Up Thread
Old web page
Old web page
Re: 87 2.6 vs. 89 3.0 V6 compatibility [Re: off-roader] #1052749 10/20/12 12:02 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
Bhealy Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
Carpet and rear bench should be a match as well correct?


87' Raider: off road package, rebuilt engine with (new) stock tires and alloy wheels but otherwise original.







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 2.469s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6296 MB (Peak: 0.7258 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-07 09:05:19 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS