|
|
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: off-roader]
#1055266
04/24/13 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
Thats for the attached ones or for the other posted ones not uploaded?
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: Lizzord30]
#1055267
04/24/13 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
Web Wheeler
|
Thats for the attached ones or for the other posted ones not uploaded? The ones posted, not the attached ones although John may chime in on that as well. The ones attached are less critical IMHO however you should warn viewers in your post when they're big. The key problem is the usability of the forum is impacted for viewers especially when their screen size is limited. My screen's at 1280 wide and I still have to scroll to the right to use it (since the reply links are on the right side of the screen). The general recommendation has been to keep pics at 800 (or IMHO even 1024) wide. The other thing affected is download times. On the road, those 350MB images can get painful especially when your viewing them on a cell phone. Thanks.
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: justrob]
#1055268
04/24/13 10:19 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
I don't think that's going to end well.... I'm sure I understand what you are trying to accomplish but I believe you've executed it incorrectly.
Any ideas for improvement, and where will go wrong. Thanks!
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: off-roader]
#1055269
04/24/13 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
Thats for the attached ones or for the other posted ones not uploaded? The ones posted, not the attached ones although John may chime in on that as well. The ones attached are less critical IMHO however you should warn viewers in your post when they're big. The key problem is the usability of the forum is impacted for viewers especially when their screen size is limited. My screen's at 1280 wide and I still have to scroll to the right to use it (since the reply links are on the right side of the screen). The general recommendation has been to keep pics at 800 (or IMHO even 1024) wide. The other thing affected is download times. On the road, those 350MB images can get painful especially when your viewing them on a cell phone. Thanks. Dont see anyway to remove a Attachment Changed the rez and changed it to photobucket. Weird you can edit the original post <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/drunk.gif" alt="" />
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: Lizzord30]
#1055270
04/24/13 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
Web Wheeler
|
What you do is change the resolution and re-upload to photobucket. Edit your post and use the new links to those resized images. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" />
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: Lizzord30]
#1055271
04/25/13 01:10 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11
Need a Spot
|
I don't think that's going to end well.... I'm sure I understand what you are trying to accomplish but I believe you've executed it incorrectly.
Any ideas for improvement, and where will go wrong. Thanks! I assume your trying to make an anti-surge housing on the front of that turbo? the ports are in the wrong place I thinks, not to mention the turbo/engine combo you have doesn't really warrant it imho... assuming i'm correct in geussing your intended goal there, if not just ignore me <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
Last edited by justrob; 04/25/13 01:29 AM.
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: justrob]
#1055272
04/25/13 03:17 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
I know for a Antisurge need to have the slots lower slightly below the start of the fins. But what I actually Hope for is a bit better airflow by getting a slight velocity stack inlet and allowing to have a constant inlet size. Plus maybe it will make some cool noises like a whistle! Not to mention much bigger and cooler looking!
A really small turbo needs all the help it can get! The slits probably reduce flow actually but o well maybe the other modifications can overcome that.
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: off-roader]
#1055273
04/28/13 07:14 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
Stands on soap box (ignore if you like :P)
Dude...... Why did you remove all the Pictures... I re-sized them.. Besides was only 1 big picture and it was uploaded as an attachment and as far as I can tell no way to remove attachment. But I changed my link and was only showing big because of a Quote that included the large Picture.
Not sure why but I re-sized the original pictures on photo bucket and it didn't seam to change what the files where on the links even after i updated the link. (maybe was loading for local cache?)
Also Why cant a user change their original post? I cant change the wrong picture links and like you said give a warning its big files (cant change name of the thread). Never been on a forum that doesn't allow you to modify your own posts.
Seams like a few updating to the forms could be done, dont get me wrong I love it here, but in the last 10yrs I have been a member here seams really no improvement from technology I use my laptop which is also pitifully low rez (1280x or something) and never once had a problem with my picture size or even larger! I REALLY hope these new laptops dont use this disgracefully small rez (cell phones are getting higher rez even!)
But I know not everyone is so tech savy, BUT almost everyone likes good pictures, just wish the form wouldn't go crazy for it <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> I have never once thought wow I wish that picture showing a mod, maintenance, or something to help overs was smaller or less detail.... almost always the other way.
Gets off Soap box <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/notooth.gif" alt="" />
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: Lizzord30]
#1055274
04/30/13 03:00 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
Wooho got a custom alinement insert made! Conquest crank size and v6 tq converter inside hope to test fit tomarow! ![[Linked Image]](http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/q714/Luke_Tainter/Montero/c497c4e6-85ff-4d05-8b92-02fd0287d955_zpsba80d1a2.jpg)
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
Re: Project 4to4D
[Re: Lizzord30]
#1055275
05/01/13 03:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 403
OP
Mudrunner
|
had to shorten the insert and bevel the edges to work but its working! ![[Linked Image]](http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/q714/Luke_Tainter/Montero/IMAG1840_zps1e731739.jpg) Now working on the intake! Idea is to make the stock intake not suck, to make it blow!!! Boost that is! Stock vs Slightly opened up ![[Linked Image]](http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/q714/Luke_Tainter/Montero/IMAG1847_zps934bf48e.jpg) Ground TB for a little more flow ![[Linked Image]](http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/q714/Luke_Tainter/Montero/IMAG1855_zpse9095667.jpg) Use second TB with flapper removed for spacer about 1.5in, then a plate under it so its a smooth surface under the tb. ![[Linked Image]](http://i1355.photobucket.com/albums/q714/Luke_Tainter/Montero/IMAG1853_zps3aa142a0.jpg)
89 Monturbo (RIP now but the heart is in the 90!) 90 Montero with 2.6 turbo swap! (close to finished) 88 Starion MPI T3/T4 Magna M8 head..... 96 Volvo 850
|
|
|
|
|
|