Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: SenorCarey] #1056023 01/16/13 02:58 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,211
JohnnyBfromPeoria Offline
Trail Leader
*****
I ran Michelin all terrain 31x10.5's on my stock Raider wheels for years without loss of stability or abnormal wear of any type. And I would probably try to hang with FastEddy in those corners, too, as I used to push it until the tires slid or I felt one lift off the pavement.

The tires lived on for several more years on another AZ Crew vehicle after I moved on from them.

John B.


'87 Raider 2.6 Turbo Auto, Under Construction
'95 Montero SR, 35x12.5/15 BFG M/T KM-2's, Rock sliders, Qtr panel chop, gas tank lift, 2" BL, Aisins, 5.29s
'95 Pajero Mini
'98 Montero Winter Ed.
'04 Cadillac XLR
'03 Kawasaki ZRX1200R
'60 Ford Falcon 4Dr
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: JohnnyBfromPeoria] #1056024 01/16/13 03:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,513
S
sasnydley Offline
Body Damage is Cool
I have ran 33x10.5x15 BFG Mud terrains on the 1990 4dr LS with the stock Pommies. I actually thought they were 7inch rims??? I never had any issues, I did after a time put 11/4" wheel spacers on -more for looks than stability- but it did both. I now have 32x11.5x 15's on truck- personally I like the 33x10.5x15 tire better on it. My 95 has 31's on it's stock wheels.


1990 Black Monty LS Over 300K' 1993 Isuzu Rodeo LS 4x4 46k (yes only 46K!)1989 Honda Transalp 600 Africa twin,
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: SenorCarey] #1056025 01/16/13 04:22 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 509
W
willwinchforfood Offline
Rock Warrior
So I'm reading correctly 12.5 will work on pommies?


SOLD!!: 91 LS 95 SR Rear LSD front 95 LS front brakes Dons Bumper 10k Gorilla/Promark winch Safari Snorkel Dual bouncy 31's

1991 Chevy Suburban 33's. All other stock.
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: willwinchforfood] #1056026 01/16/13 07:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,458
rxinhed Offline
Trail Leader
*****
NO...way too narrow... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/zombie.gif" alt="" />

Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: willwinchforfood] #1056027 01/16/13 02:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,269
justice Offline
Roll Me Over
*****
Quote
So I'm reading correctly 12.5 will work on pommies?


Seen a guy on here do it once. Unkown as to the long term verdict was.


99 Gen 2.5, fixing blown head gasket
89 SWB- 33's, ARB Front locker, SR rear locker/axle, SR F brakes, winch, WST Offroad Armor all Around, 2.85 Aussie T-case Gears (SOLD)
Sold: (2) 95 SR's, 86 SWB, 90LWB, 91 LWB
-Can Change a timing belt in my sleep..
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: rxinhed] #1056028 01/16/13 03:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 509
W
willwinchforfood Offline
Rock Warrior
Dang iphone, I meant 11.5?


SOLD!!: 91 LS 95 SR Rear LSD front 95 LS front brakes Dons Bumper 10k Gorilla/Promark winch Safari Snorkel Dual bouncy 31's

1991 Chevy Suburban 33's. All other stock.
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: willwinchforfood] #1056029 01/16/13 03:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,348
Mudraider Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Quote
Dang iphone, I meant 11.5?


My 32-11.50/15's went on with no problem.

Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: jdavis] #1056030 01/17/13 02:40 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,479
StockRaider Offline
Roll Me Over
***
I mounted 33x10.5 BFG KM2s on my Raider, front no rubbing, the rear with the wider than stock SR axle has zero rubbing issues at all. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" />

[Linked Image]


Richard E
1989 Montero - Stock-ish
1989 V6 Auto Raider - 5.3 Vortech Swap.
1987 Mitsubishi Starion 2.6t, soon to be 3.5
1983 Honda XL600R
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: StockRaider] #1056031 01/17/13 04:03 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,348
Mudraider Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Quote
I mounted 33x10.5 BFG KM2s on my Raider, front no rubbing, the rear with the wider than stock SR axle has zero rubbing issues at all. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" />

[Linked Image]


That disc brake axle is the shizznit isn't it? Stop on a dime and get change.


89 SWB, V-6 5SPD, OME Shocks, 16.5X37's, 2"BL, SR axle, Gen2 brakes, Lincoln w/Superwinch
Re: Any issue with 10.5s on stock pomegranates? [Re: Mudraider] #1056032 01/17/13 05:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 509
W
willwinchforfood Offline
Rock Warrior
Firstly most importantly, that Red Raider looks sweet. I like them clean like that. Secondlly and most awesomly, I ran a really hardcore trail here in north Ga with the disc brake axle installed. I dont think I would have had near the control and confidence on the trail without it. If i can find a leaf spring locker out of a sport Id stick it under my 84 asap.


SOLD!!: 91 LS 95 SR Rear LSD front 95 LS front brakes Dons Bumper 10k Gorilla/Promark winch Safari Snorkel Dual bouncy 31's

1991 Chevy Suburban 33's. All other stock.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6438 MB (Peak: 0.7517 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-18 13:14:34 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS