I think the best vehicle to compare this project to would be the FJ Cruiser. While the FJ Cruiser is a decent offroad vehicle it falls short of it's main competitor, the Jeep JK, when it comes to offroad prowess.

Despite it's lack of off road prowess the FJ Cruiser is a huge success because nostalgia and build quality. Toyota did something right because the FJ Cruiser has the highest resale value of any car on the market.

http://www.bankrate.com/finance/auto/top-cars-in-class-high-resale-value-7.aspx

For Mitsubishi to be successful they need to build a modern SUV that taps into it's racing heritage. I think it is critical that the name links the vehicle to this heritage as well. For instance, calling it the Mitsubishi Dakar would be a great idea.

From there, large wheel openings, no plastic molding, retro paint job, powerful modern engine like the 3.8 MIVEC, a 6 speed manual, Lockers, etc.

The one thing I am torn on is the front axle. Traditionally Mitsubishi has typically used independent front suspension but I think a solid axle is necessary to lure buyers away from Jeep and Toyota. If it had a diesel and a solid front axle it would be a run-a-way success and would move 100K units per year.


Spence
1985 Mitsubishi PU 2.3 Turbo Diesel, 13" lift, Watercooled turbo, 4D56 Head, Atlas II,Fox Coilovers, Elockers,

1983 Mitsubishi PU 2.5 Turbo Diesel 4x4, fully restored

2003 G500, sliders, beadlocks, roofrack, ladder etc.