|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113987
02/22/03 09:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 694
Rock Warrior
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by Kevin Wolford: <strong> <snip> As of 2000, the Trooper does have better front axle articulation, <snip> My 0.02
Kevin</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">I'll agree here. The Isuzu IFS doesn't flex like a solid axle, but Doug's 93 Montero behaves like the spindles are bolted to the frame.
-Tad (who is going to rely on a front locker rather than a solid axle for a while)
1994 Trooper. 3.2 DOHC/auto. 4.77s,3xARB, OME 919HD springs. 34" Swamper LTBs 2001 Trooper "stock" <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> http://www.planetisuzoo.com
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113988
02/22/03 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,911
Trail Leader
|
I'm an Isuzu RODEO owner, so I don't have any first-hand ownership experiences to contribute here, BUT... I got to witness the Mitsubishi Montero's capabilities from the passenger seat of DougH's, at the July`02 Uwharrie Fun Run. --- Very impressive indeed!Pix of Doug's Monty in action that day <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" /> If you ever get the opportunity to ride shotgun with Doug… Take it!!! --- But be sure to bring a hefty supply of Dramamine & Valium! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> As for the differences... From everything that I’ve seen, the Trooper & Montero are BOTH amazingly capable off-road vehicles, and given the necessary funds, I would be equally pleased to possess either one of them. (And with a Lotto Jackpot in my pocket… I'd get a few built-up examples of each!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Cool]" src="images/icons/cool.gif" /> ) Cheers! Smiley <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />
Six Isuzus, so far... still have three of them.
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113989
02/24/03 04:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 166
Wheeler
|
I did some reading this weekend found out two more interesting things. The Montero was considered more luxurous and has better crash and the alternator placement 96 Trooper (it was the Acura actually) in a comparison test was throughly disliked.
Kevin
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113990
02/24/03 04:39 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
alternator placement... ?? wtf? where did they put it that could possibly be annoying, up the driver's ... uhh... nose or something?
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113991
02/24/03 05:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 166
Wheeler
|
The alternator on the 6VD1 is LOW. Like, next to the differential low. It tends to get into water and mud. Alternators don't like mud or water.
KW
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113992
02/24/03 05:59 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Alternator is in a horrible position on all Troops/Rodeos on the 3.2L engines (Not sure about pre 3.2 or the 3.5)
Alt is bottom right corner, PITA to get too, Also horrid location for water crossing.
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113993
02/25/03 06:06 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 598
Rock Warrior
|
I get in the mud and some water quite a bit. Any suggestions on where/how the alternator could be relocated fairly easily on a 99 Trooper?
'99 Trooper, ARBs, 4.77s, ARB bullbar, Warn M8000 w/Amsteel, OME 912s w/2.5" spacers, Rancho 9000xs, K&N/Magnaflow, 33" Kumho MT's, Aisins, boulder bars, Indy 4X brake lines, diff drop, Flexalite
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113994
02/25/03 06:26 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,016
Isuzu Moderator
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by DaveFL: <strong>Alternator is in a horrible position on all Troops/Rodeos on the 3.2L engines </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Might as well throw the 2.6 onto that list as well. I have completely toasted one alt. and had to rebuild another within the past 16 months. <img border="0" alt="[Shiner]" title="" src="graemlins/shiner.gif" />
Sean Strawmyer Back and ready to rock...... crawl. From Indiana or surrounding states and interested in wheelin'? Check out www.mwior.com
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113995
02/24/03 09:17 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 362
OP
Mudrunner
|
i know the alternator position on my montero sucks. it's low as hell. <img src="http://pics.montypics.com/montygrant/2003-01-24/montero5resized.jpg" alt=" - " /> after going through this, my alternator, and most of the engine compartment was CAKED in mud. oh well. i waited a day, hosed it off (nervously) and luckily it still puts out amps like champ.
-Grant '98 Montero with 135k miles
|
|
Re: Trooper vs. Montero
#113996
02/24/03 09:52 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,016
Isuzu Moderator
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by MontyGrant: <strong> after going through this... it still puts out amps like champ.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Great looking truck. I was quite a bit deeper than that when I fried my alt though <img border="0" alt="[Shiner]" title="" src="graemlins/shiner.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />
Sean Strawmyer Back and ready to rock...... crawl. From Indiana or surrounding states and interested in wheelin'? Check out www.mwior.com
|
|
|
|