|
|
|
|
Re: 3.2l DOHC owners...
#124311
02/03/03 08:19 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by BagaYams: <strong>Snowrodeo - Not sure how your figure the DOHC 3.2/3.5 has hydraulic lash adjusters??? There's nothing at all hydraulic about them. They are a mechanical shim & bucket design that has to be adjusted manually.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Yes Yams- they do. I have a 94 3.2 DOHC Trooper that does have HLAs. I guess Tad and I have the only DOHC around these parts. Good thing I have a shop manual <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />
[edit]The only instance I've aware of with a 3.2 DOHC is in the SE version of said Troopers [/edit] <small>[ February 03, 2003, 02:22 PM: Message edited by: migo90 ]</small>
|
|
Re: 3.2l DOHC owners...
#124312
02/03/03 11:29 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Wow, 4 cams & 24 hydraulic lifters!! Talk about metal madness in them heads! I'd like to see a pic of that setup. Didn't know that Zu 3.2 existed. Thanks for the lesson guys <img border="0" alt="[Baby]" title="" src="graemlins/baby.gif" /> . Isuzu never ceases to amaze me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" /> .
|
|
Re: 3.2l DOHC owners...
#124313
02/04/03 08:07 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I know there is some conflicting information. Tad & I spoke a little about it yesterday. All I can offer is... <img src="http://www.mindspring.com/~mjblp/NEW/HLAsmall.jpeg" alt=" - " /> and a larger picI'm not sure where you're getting the 2 extra cams <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="images/icons/tongue.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />
|
|
Re: 3.2l DOHC owners...
#124314
02/04/03 09:17 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans"> Originally posted by migo90: I'm not sure where you're getting the 2 extra cams </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Thanks for the pic! What I meant by 4 cams is 2 per head for the V6, 4 total. Reason why I said this, is I once was chatting w/ a guy (supposed gear head) who was bragging about his "DOHC V6" as we were peering at his motor during a car show. He actually thought is was a DOHC because he had 2 cams in the engine!!! One per head! Didn't want to embarrass the guy by telling him he actually had a SOHC V6 so I walked away. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="images/icons/wink.gif" />
|
|
Re: 3.2l DOHC owners...
#124315
02/05/03 06:20 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 290
Mudrunner
|
i guess i just assumed that since the tag under the hood said "3.2 liter" and the title said 1997 Rodeo S and when i changed the timing belt it had to go around two camshaft drive wheels, that it must be a 3.2l DOHC. I knew about the HLA's from reading the haynes book, although i will admit the haynes book was 180degrees wrong on my axle seal replacement (they showed the amigo setup as the rodeo). i'm still not sure where you get 4 cams from, tho'. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> there's only one camshaft on each head and then a bunch of rube goldberg setups to drive all the valves (and start ticking). i know some motors have twin cams on each head but not this one.
97Rodeo Rancho9ks/Aisins/3.2L SOHC/M1 only ------ Proper Prior Planning Prevents P*ss-Poor Performance--Maj. R.T.Spooner USMC(Ret.)
|
|
|
|
|
|