Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
at and mt #135089 10/28/02 03:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 614
pinoy99 Offline OP
Rock Warrior
2 yoko geolander at+ is finally showing their age but the 2 other ones are practically new. For the sake of trying new set of tires, I'll probably go with GY MT/R's. The 64k questions is, do I just buy 2 new ones and run the truck with the combo of at & mt? Most likely that the MT will be on the rear and the truck will spend 2hi on-road;TOD to be used only during off-road/incliment(snow) weather. Thoughts and/or experiences?

EDIT: manufacturer spec size for at is 33" while mt is 33.1"

<small>[ October 28, 2002, 10:29 AM: Message edited by: pinoy99 ]</small>

Re: at and mt #135090 10/28/02 04:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,007
Richard Saylor Offline
Roll Me Over
*****
I have a friend that is running MTs in the back and ATs in the front. Hasn't hurt anything. The only thing is that if you want to keep the MTs in the back, you loose the ability to rotate the tires. If you don't care, then you can still rotate them. Either way it doesn't damage the vehicle any. When I bought my MTs I had 2 brand new tires and 2 fairly worn tires, but I went ahead and got all 4 MTs so that I could rotate my tires. I had 2 extra rims, so I put the 2 newest ones of the old tires on them so that I would have 2 full size spares instead of just 1.

Richard


Had an 89 Isuzu Pickup
Had a 94 Mitsubishi Eclipse
84 Honda XL185S
Had an 89 Isuzu Trooper w/ 3.4 V6
01 Toyota Tundra SR5 V8 4Door Access Cab
http://community.webshots.com/user/rsayloriii
Re: at and mt #135091 10/28/02 04:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,868
Jim_Paget Offline
Roll Me Over
The issue is whether or not the tires are the same diameter. That means measuring, not the size on the sidewall. If you run too big a differential in size while in 4WD you will have big problems. If the sizes are within a fraction of an inch in actual size, I see no problem.


Jim Paget
88 YJ with a few changes

www.rrr4x4.com
Re: at and mt #135092 10/28/02 04:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 789
4
4Play Offline
Rock Warrior
To me that would just look odd (funny). I would try to get a set of used AT's for the front, run the rears down and buy 4 M/T's.

Or get four M/T's and either sell the ATs or keep them as 2 good spares (this might mean you'd have to buy an extra rim ~$35).

I agree with Richard it won't hurt anything as long as the height of the tires are close.

This is just my opinion, take it FWIW
Ashby


'00 Rodeo LSE 4WD, 3.2, Black, LSD, OME 919s w/ 2in Spacers, Superwinch Hubs, RS9KXLs, Indy4x steel braided brake lines, LT 265-75-16 MT/Rs, ShrockBars, DOR HD rear Lat. Bar, MagnaFlow.
Re: at and mt #135093 10/28/02 05:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,781
D
DougH Offline
Mitsubishi Forum Moderator
Will it hurt on the road, probally not. But I wouldnt want a different amount of traction front and rear if I was offroading.

Get another 2 at's for riding on the road. The mtrs are awesome tires, but their life could be better. I chewed through mine in probally around 25k 30k, I wasnt counting. They were painfull hard miles though for the tires, so I assume you could get better.

If your in NJ, why havent I ever met you lol. Where do you wheel?


DougH
1997 SR - Current Lawn Ornament
1995 SR - RIP
1993 RS - RIP
Re: at and mt #135094 10/29/02 12:42 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,007
Richard Saylor Offline
Roll Me Over
*****
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans"> The mtrs are awesome tires, but their life could be better. I chewed through mine in probally around 25k 30k </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Jees, I've got more than 20,000 miles on my MTRs now and they barely show any sign of wear. And those are mostly highway miles. As long as you don't have a directional tire, rotating them will help extend the life of them.

Richard


Had an 89 Isuzu Pickup
Had a 94 Mitsubishi Eclipse
84 Honda XL185S
Had an 89 Isuzu Trooper w/ 3.4 V6
01 Toyota Tundra SR5 V8 4Door Access Cab
http://community.webshots.com/user/rsayloriii
Re: at and mt #135095 10/29/02 07:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 248
TLB Offline
Wheeler
Richard,

[QUOTE]Originally posted by DougH:
[QB]
They were painfull hard miles though for the tires, so I assume you could get better.

A lot of wheeling will definately chew up a pair of tires. I didn't get the rated 40,000 miles out of my tires, but I wheeled them a bit. Just a bit of info.

Tim B.
99 Rodeo


Tim Barlow
05' Sequoia SR5
98' 4Runner SR5
Re: at and mt #135096 10/29/02 01:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,133
Paisan Offline
Body Damage is Cool
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by Richard Saylor:
<strong>Jees, I've got more than 20,000 miles on my MTRs now and they barely show any sign of wear. And those are mostly highway miles. As long as you don't have a directional tire, rotating them will help extend the life of them.

Richard</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">So just for the record you don't wheel that much. Just wanted to clear that up since you seem to preach a lot about offroading and knowing a lot about offroading!

-mike


97 Rodeo -> 00 Trooper LS (too many mods to list)
88&91 Subaru XT6 -> 92 Subaru SVX
My Websites: http://isuzu-suvs.com
Re: at and mt #135097 10/29/02 01:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,133
Paisan Offline
Body Damage is Cool
For on-road TOD use you need to have the tires within 1/4" Circumference. This means that even 2 tires of very similar wear and brand and model etc can be off (I had this problem when I first got my trooper) so be careful of that for onroad situations.

For offroad low traction it probably won't be a problem since slippage can occur but I wouldn't recommend it either way.

-mike


97 Rodeo -> 00 Trooper LS (too many mods to list)
88&91 Subaru XT6 -> 92 Subaru SVX
My Websites: http://isuzu-suvs.com
Re: at and mt #135098 10/29/02 02:20 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
I had the same issue and received quite a few, conflicting opinions on it...

http://www.northeastonlinewheelers....=4;action=dis play;threadid=4117;start=0

http://www.outdoorwire.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=68;t=008542

In the end, I decided to play it safe and just get 2 more tires (total of 4 new ones.) I'm quite happy with them. That GY MT-R is an awesome tire, but was way out of my price range. I decided on DUNLOP RADIAL ROVER R/T's.

More aggressive then most AT's, but not quite as aggressive as an MT. Very heavy side wall, and at $76 per tire (235/75-15, a bargain.

<img src="http://www.tirerack.com/tires/images/dunlop/du_radial_rover_rt.jpg" alt=" - " />

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires.jsp?tireMake=Dunlop&tireModel=Radial+Rover+R%2FT

<small>[ October 29, 2002, 08:22 AM: Message edited by: Sporin ]</small>

Page 1 of 2 1 2







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 3.879s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.6388 MB (Peak: 0.7629 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-10 19:00:16 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS