</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by Big Blue:
<strong>I think it should be called the "Mitsu Way" and not the "American Way" as our rigs have MUCH lower Differential gear ratios than the typical "American Rig" STOCK. I'm not talking about "custom built" rig's, But the problem for most of us is that there isn't enough power, and/or enough low range ratio for technical "rock crawling". Lloyd's working on one solution, and I'm working on another. BOTH are EXPENSIVE!!!!, but both should fix the problem.
Kary</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Agreed Kary. Our rigs have higher gears than most rigs modified. Personally I would want to go any higher than 4.88 because the gears start to weaken.

I like your 4.3 way, but I can only dream, for now. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="images/icons/grin.gif" />

As for a tcase, im sure you can get an adaptor fabed for the tranny output, and the case itself. The only issue I see is the shifter rail passes through the tranny into the tcase if I rember correctly.

I could see that as a solution, but I dont want lower gears in my genII, and thats my only fresh motor. My genI with 200k on the clock, and so so compression, would be much better suited with a 4.3 or other.

Cheers,


DougH
1997 SR - Current Lawn Ornament
1995 SR - RIP
1993 RS - RIP