Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: Lloyd Swartz] #375996 01/09/04 04:44 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,892
stony-man Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
I bought my hitch at the dealership so I'd still have my hook, and I wanted the hitch bolted to the frame...the freakin' thing only cost me 100 bucks NEW at the dealer!!


- '92 LWB V6 3.0 5 sp
33x10.5 BFG M/Ts & Bouncy seat
- '95 LWB V6 3.0 Auto (Scrapped)
- '05 Montero Limited. Bone stock <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: stony-man] #375997 01/09/04 03:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,160
Lloyd Swartz Offline
Web Wheeler
Quote
I bought my hitch at the dealership so I'd still have my hook, and I wanted the hitch bolted to the frame...the freakin' thing only cost me 100 bucks NEW at the dealer!!


Secret is, the stock hitch system IS in the frame <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/coolg.gif" alt="" />


1996 SR From the Area 51 Skunk Works. 37"BFG Tires, 5" lift, Rock Track 4:1 Case, Tom Woods Drive Shafts, Oasis Air, Front ARB, lifted gas tank, T-max winch and lots of stuff that cost too much.
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: Lloyd Swartz] #375998 01/09/04 04:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,892
stony-man Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
Quote
Quote
I bought my hitch at the dealership so I'd still have my hook, and I wanted the hitch bolted to the frame...the freakin' thing only cost me 100 bucks NEW at the dealer!!


Secret is, the stock hitch system IS in the frame <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/coolg.gif" alt="" />


DOH!! So, once again I did something unecessary? I'm not too bummed, as I like having both, and the lower hitch I bought saved my Monty BIG TIME at Tellico last summer. LOL


- '92 LWB V6 3.0 5 sp
33x10.5 BFG M/Ts & Bouncy seat
- '95 LWB V6 3.0 Auto (Scrapped)
- '05 Montero Limited. Bone stock <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: stony-man] #375999 01/09/04 07:05 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
After looking at the stock hitch mount, I was under the impression that the stock location if for the mounting of pintle hook rigs which makes a lot of sense in the 3rd world places where these monty's were sold. Given the extreme angles and articulation required when traversing what passes for a 'road' in places like Indonesia etc. a "US" type trailer mount would bind up something awful whereas the pintle/ring setup is hell for strong and allows tons of articulation.

The question has to be then, why is everyone slapping below-the- bumper receiver hitches on these things? Is it because the hitch height is too high for what you are pulling?


seer

Re: Why aren't we building these? #376000 01/09/04 07:24 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,281
don Offline
Roll Me Over
Factory trailers tend to be positioned for "Typical" family station wagon (remember those?) or mini-van bumper heights.
Most trailers also expect (and need to be) to be trailed very horizontal.

Thus must SUV's need to drop their hitches down to reach the trailer's height.

Some of us have lifted their trailer's suspension to reduce the drop required. Others add a lifted tongue to their trailers.

Boat trailers are especially sensitive to horizontal loading. If you reach the trailer's tongue up too high, the trailer becomes very front-light, and that makes for interesting hitchup exercises (done once, and never again!)

...rambling.


Don `87 Mitsu 2dr, Rubicon survivor, GModified.
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: don] #376001 01/09/04 07:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 758
DanWheeler Offline
Rock Warrior
Word. My utility trailer is pimpin' in the back and jacked in the front.

I just have the L bracket with ball from John Baker.


1986 Montero 2.6l
31X10.5 BFG MT - Weber carb with custom intake
Rear LSD - RCI seats - Oil cooler - Manual hubs
Custom bumpers front and rear + rock sliders
Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: don] #376002 01/09/04 07:54 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 731
FranklinP Offline OP
Rock Warrior
Thats the supposed to be the beauty of the reciever hitch, You can get all kinds of drop/raise hitches to fit them. They flip up or down to provide drop. I thought a 2" body lift might allow the reciever tube to go Above the bumper. I have to experiment. Any rate the hitch just pulls off for off road use. But your right under bumper mounting of reciever is no good.


1989 Dodge Raider V-6, 33" Swampers.
Raider pics

Re: Why aren't we building these? [Re: FranklinP] #376003 01/10/04 01:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
off-roader Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
I posted this months ago. Some of you may not have seen it.

I got Roger Brown (AKA 4Crawler 4x4... www.4crawler.com) to fabricate a low profile hitch 2" hitch that you can use any standard stinger on for any gen I, & II Montero's.

No need to modify your stock bumper and you don't loose anywhere near as much clearance even over the unit you posted.

With Metric Grade 12.5 (better than SAE Grade 8) bolts, it comes to roughly $75.

Just the bolts alone cost like $4 ea.

Oh, it uses socket head (allen wrench) bolts.

http://www.4x4wire.com/forums/showf...in=332744&Search=true#Post332744

Ray


Off Roader
98 Montero with the Winter Package
89 Montero minty clean and reserved for overlanding trips or Cars and Coffee events
96SR (3.15:1 xcase, 35's) gone to the rust gods
96SR Build Up Thread
Old web page
Old web page
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 16 (0.008s) Memory: 0.6318 MB (Peak: 0.7440 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-11-15 21:04:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS