Sigh. After a while it get silly. Remember, we're both SUPPORTING Isuzu.

so, you really believe Toyotas have no Tech bulletins and NTSBs ?
I never said that. I always said, percentage wise, they have less. Never have I said they have made tens of millions of cars with no errors or breakdowns. Silly arguements don't make a position stronger.

I saw the Outback awarded as the most reliable vehicle of North America (it shared the first place with Lexus LS400). I do not believe that they made U-turn just in 2 years.
From your "2 year" reference I'll assume you meen the 2001 ratings were great (2003 - 2 years) since 2004 ratings obviously aren't out yet. But again, who's ratings said Outback was #1 reliability?

As you say, Sabaru can't make a turn-around in 2 years....so here they are in 2001 ranked 31 out of 37 and way below the industry average. Rhetorical question: How can they be #1 in 2003 if they can't turn around in 2 years?

Can't find docs: Nor do I know what understandable reasons are.

Please, if you want to take it offline, I'm at [email]Sanaghan@yahoo.com.[/email] If you have some concrete proof that Isuzu North America is high in quality compared to other current models (note I'm NOT saying they quality stinks, just that there are others who do it better) then I would honestly love to see it.

YMNFJHDT : <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> Not in any internet acronym dictionary or Google. You May Now Forget Just Heavy Dodge Trucks?

Otherwise, let's stick more to the heading topic or we'll just be locked.