|
|
Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
#405226
02/23/04 07:05 AM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anybody done this up front? I ran some searches hoping to find something, but couldn't come up with anything. I think this is the route i'm going to take with my 93 long bed in the near future...I'm still debating about it, cause i know this will be a money sucking project that will never end...Any advice or comments would be great, as i'm currently trying to track down a set of axles. To complement the package, i'm thinking a 350 or a 93-98 supra motor, 14b rear and 38sx's. Has anyone done a T100 SAS writeup of any sort yet? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
John
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
#405227
03/04/04 01:36 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,921
Body Damage is Cool
|
Has anyone done a T100 SAS writeup of any sort yet? No, we're all still waiting patiently for either this guy in Alaska or this other guy in Texas to get on it... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/bird.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> What were your thoughts for a 60? Is there one that is within a relatively close width or are you talking a custom fab?
4xGeek (Chris) '97 T-100 4wd sr5-suto, 3" BL, 1.5" BJ spacers, 35" ProComp AT's, 4.88's, Bilsteins x 6, etc... No longer stuck in SoCal!!
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
#405228
03/04/04 02:39 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,157
Body Damage is Cool
|
i'm thinking a 350 or a 93-98 supra motor, <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
John I like the Supra motor idea <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" />
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: Arrowhead]
#405230
03/04/04 11:09 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 273
Mudrunner
|
explain how a 9" is stronger than a 60 <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: BIG-T]
#405231
03/04/04 11:59 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,466
Roll Me Over
|
extra pinion bearing for one. trust us, it is stronger.
Scott Landon 1995 T100 - total buildup underway 1988 4Runner (22RE, W56) - new DD 2005 Dodge CTD 4x4 - Tow Beast 1990 Spec Miata 2010 GT3 2013 E92 M3
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: surlynkid]
#405232
03/06/04 01:55 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 273
Mudrunner
|
What about the ring gear, tubes, shafts, being a full floater. I know you can upgrade all those on a 9" but stock the 60 seems much stronger but heavy.
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: BIG-T]
#405233
03/06/04 01:58 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 273
Mudrunner
|
Also I would be more than willing to do a writeup on my SAS but I realy have no idea where to start. maybe people can give me ideas on what they wnat and I'll try to get something together.
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: BIG-T]
#405234
03/06/04 04:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 147
Wheeler
|
What about the ring gear, tubes, shafts, being a full floater. I know you can upgrade all those on a 9" but stock the 60 seems much stronger but heavy. If you looked at the pictures on Pirate, you should have seen the 9" was beefier - The ring gear is smaller in diameter but is considerably thicker, making it much stronger than the Dana 60. The Dana 60 pinion is 1.250, the 9" is 1.313, while the Dana 80 is 1.625 The axles can be made as beefy as you want - 35 spline is always nice. Here's another site that makes a complete 9" setup, the 3rd member isn't as good in my opinion, as the one mentioned on Pirate, but they pretty much address what the 9" is all about. http://www.sunrayengineering.com/
|
|
Re: Has anyone put a 60 under a T100?
[Re: Arrowhead]
#405235
03/07/04 05:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,160
Toyota Moderator
|
Ring gear thickness has nothing to do with it. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" /> Most of the strength advantages are related to the pinion. - Its got the extra pinion bearing support (similar to a GM 14-bolt) - Overall beef of the pinion (bigger, thicker) - Greater pinion offset. This changes the tooth angle and increases the tooth contact area (spreads the load over more teeth at one time). It makes it work a little bit more like a "worm" gear that most other differentials. The disadvantage of the greater pinion offset is a lower pinion (driveshaft angle and ground clearance), however if its the reverse-cut, high-pinion version in the Pirate thread, then it works just the opposite and gives you a higher pinion and driveshaft than other high-pinion diffs do.  I don't know why they said the ring gear thickness has anything to do with it. If that were the case, then lower gears (numerically higher), which natrualy have a thicker ring gear than higher gears, would be seemingly stronger, and we know they're not...
|
|
|
|