</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">Originally posted by JonS:
<strong>Guys I just looked at the specs and its 355 nanometers of torque, not lb/ft. I don't know what that figures out to, but I my guess is less <img border="0" alt="[Hillbilly]" title="" src="graemlins/notooth.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helv, Helvetica, Sans">FYI, nano means 10 ^-9, I think you are seeing something that looks like nM. That means Newton Meters. 1 Newton Meter is .737561 ft/lb. So that would mean that 355 nM is actually 261.8 ft/lb. 355 nano nM's would be .000000261 ft/lb, not going anywhere fast with torque like that.

If you search on "convert.exe" you find a freeware program for converting units of all kinds of measure. It's a lifesave sometimes doing homework.

Frank.

<small>[ December 13, 2002, 09:25 PM: Message edited by: elripster ]</small>