BCBMDE, as I said before, I did not switch out my actual sensor, only the housing. [color:"red"] [/color] There is nothing wrong with the MAF sensor. I state again. [color:"black"] [/color] The only thing changed is the housing. If anyone were to actually look at the stock MAF in your Isuzu and take off the screen, you would see what I am talking about how restrictive it is. Even taking into consideration using a non-altered throttle body, the MAF is the biggest constriction in the entire intake. Short of putting an air-flow meter in the intake to measure cfm, it's definately pulling more air. I assumed, and we all know what happens there, that the ECM would be able to adjust automatically. Apparently not. I will be able to tell for sure when I get my gauge hooked up tonight when I get home. And for the record, when I purchased my MAF ends (used), I also got free a MAF that was for that size intake. I tried it as well, and got the exact same results. The only difference that one can even tell is that there is a little extra plastic on 2 small tabs due to the smaller opening that protrudes into the MAF body. Instead of trying to pick holes in an installation, which I am fairly meticulous about, please someone give me some concrete knowledge to go against a lean air/fuel ratio. I think Randii was on the money about the fuel map being offset due to a lower flow rate. Everything I've read about using NOS, Supercharger, and Turbos point to having to adjust EFI's to take into account the extra volume of air.


3.2L V6 SOHC 1996 Isuzu Rodeo. Flowmaster exhaust / K&N High Flow Intake / Kenwood headunit / Audiobahn Subs / Alphasonik/Kenwood/Sony Amps / 180 amp High-output alternator / Redtop Optima battery / Custom hood w/ scoop