Yes,they are wrong,do you aknowledge that? Secondly,there is no way to add an extension to the handle end of a beam type torque wrench and then have the scale have any meaning at all.A non-beam type torque wrench will allow use of a extension on the handle end (a pipe).It will read correctly,no formula needed.
No, I don't acknowlege that, but I'll let the publishers of the data know - perhaps they've got a big job waiting for you. Meanwhile, perhaps you could explain to us why the drawings are wrong. The drawings were not for beam-type torque wrenches - they are for the break-over click-type torque wrenches. I do agree that a handle extension on a break-over torque wrench makes no difference except in the amount of effort (mechanical advantage) required to establish torque at the fastner.
I guess he finally found one guy ,eh?
Yes, you seem to be a real maven.
Sorry I can't jump on that one, but if tou find an answer I think I could follow the explanation.So I look forward to that.
You do seem to enjoy jumping.... but then the "sparring" comment was a clue.
Say, Scotty - your knowlege is appreciated here, but I doubt the "sparring" is as much. This board has a lot of congenial folks who are trying to learn as much as they can about their vehicles. I'm sure they would benefit from your remarks if they're offerred in a constructive way - so why not lose the attitude and join the fun, eh? Maybe we can repay the favor of your knowledge and give you some charm school lessons in return?
Who knows - maybe even you will learn something? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
Frank
