Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 12 13
Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: DirtyHarry] #564276 02/07/05 10:36 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,768
Brian894X4 Offline OP
Trail Leader
*****
Harry, not only did Toyota of Japan build front lockers for the 80 series, but also for dozens of different models of the 70 series as well. And they also offer them in certain models of the current 100 series, overseas. Whether they'll offer them in this rig or not, none of knows. And since we're picking on Japanese manufactures, don't forget about Nissan's overseas rigs, which were and are also equipped with F/R lockers.

As for build and design quality regarding rigs made in Japan, I still think it can be argued that Japanese built Toyotas are better, but that is a subjective viewpoint is that hard to prove, so lets just leave it as my opinion. I could give you antidotal evidence, but it's a matter of opinion. As far as Toyota quality verses certain other vehicles, whether domestic or not, (What's a domestic anyway? Many Fords and GMs are built outside the US and Chrysler is German owned and run) anyone on this board who has owned a Toyota/Honda/Subaru and owned or driven other rigs like I have, understands the difference, period. Nuff said about that.

However, I think there is a distinct difference between Toyotas "designed" in Japan for global markets and Toyotas "designed" for North American. Just look at the new 4Runner and the Land Cruiser 100, for example. Both were designed and built in Japan. Both are extremely heavy duty, compared to the North American only models, like the Tundra, Sequoia, and Tacoma. If you'd like, I could run through it point by point, but I think most of you understand the differences between these vehicles, if you've read any of my past posts. The differences also extend to the latest designs of the Hilux and Tacoma. The Hilux is far stronger, uses a 4Runner style fully boxed frame, mainly because it's expected to carry 1 ton loads, just like the prior Hilux models.

The North American made Toyotas were largely designed by American designers, especially the latest ones like the 2005 Tacoma. They were given much leeway in which OEM manufactures they could use and in design. They were expected to see paved American roads for 99.999% of their life and that was considered in the design. But most importantly, especially in the case of the pick-ups, they were never going to be rated for more than 1/2 ton loads, so, unlike Japanese designed and built pick-ups, they could factor that into the design. And that's why we see things like C-channel frames on the Tacoma and Tundra, which are a big weight savings, compared to the 4Runner and Land Cruiser, which are much heavier, but heavier duty as well.

Just slapping a Toyota name on a design or a factory does not make for a high quality rig. Ask anyone who owns the famous Brazilian Bandeirante, the FJ40 design that lasted until 2001. It was total crap. They were famous for breaking down and falling apart, because, they used local OEM parts and design and couldn't match the quality of the Japanese built rigs. That's an extreme example, but it goes to show that Toyota doesn't have an international policy that rigs built outside of Japan have to meet Japanese built standards by 100%, like some folks assume.

I'm not saying that American built Toyotas are crap. I wouldn't hesitate to own a Tacoma. Especially the old models. But I would understand that the quality of that rig and it's design, while better than any other American sold mini-truck, is inferior in many ways to the older Toyota pick-ups and the Toyota pick-ups currently built overseas. If I had to buy another Toyota in the future, I would definitely feel much better if it was designed and made in Japan. That's just my opinion.


Last edited by Brian894X4; 02/07/05 10:40 PM.

[color:"blue"]My Toyota/Expedition Website[/color]
Foreign & Military Toyotas - Expedition 4x4s
Our historical explorations & much more

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: DirtyHarry] #564277 02/07/05 10:56 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 354
jcssurf Offline
Mudrunner
Quote
If you want a factory wheeler, quit waiting for Toyota and get yourself a Wrangler or Power Wagon.


Hmmmm...power wagon too big to fit anywhere and a wrangler has about the interior room of a mini-cooper (and $30,000 for a rubicon <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/ignore.gif" alt="" /> ). Even the new long wheelbased ones have miniscule room.

Besides all that, Chrysler makes some of the cheapest, piece-o-crap vehicles on the market.

I personally will keep waiting for an exceptional factory wheeler from Toyota (TRD tacoma is close). And until then, would spend the extra money I saved by NOT getting Pwagon or Rubicon, on some mods to a Tacoma that would make it virtually as capable.


90 pickup, 22RE, stiff-ass Ranchos, 2.25 catback, 4:1 header, conical intake, 15x7 ICW alloys, 32x11.50 Dunlop Mud Rovers, 4.56s w/v6 rear

-Farm truck until school is done...then plans

2000 Honda CRV EX 5 speed

-Driver

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: Brian894X4] #564278 02/07/05 11:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,935
bkg Offline
Roll Me Over
Quote
Harry, not only did Toyota of Japan build front lockers for the 80 series, but also for dozens of different models of the 70 series as well. And they also offer them in certain models of the current 100 series, overseas. Whether they'll offer them in this rig or not, none of knows. And since we're picking on Japanese manufactures, don't forget about Nissan's overseas rigs, which were and are also equipped with F/R lockers.

As for build and design quality regarding rigs made in Japan, I still think it can be argued that Japanese built Toyotas are better, but that is a subjective viewpoint is that hard to prove, so lets just leave it as my opinion. I could give you antidotal evidence, but it's a matter of opinion. As far as Toyota quality verses certain other vehicles, whether domestic or not, (What's a domestic anyway? Many Fords and GMs are built outside the US and Chrysler is German owned and run) anyone on this board who has owned a Toyota/Honda/Subaru and owned or driven other rigs like I have, understands the difference, period. Nuff said about that.

However, I think there is a distinct difference between Toyotas "designed" in Japan for global markets and Toyotas "designed" for North American. Just look at the new 4Runner and the Land Cruiser 100, for example. Both were designed and built in Japan. Both are extremely heavy duty, compared to the North American only models, like the Tundra, Sequoia, and Tacoma. If you'd like, I could run through it point by point, but I think most of you understand the differences between these vehicles, if you've read any of my past posts. The differences also extend to the latest designs of the Hilux and Tacoma. The Hilux is far stronger, uses a 4Runner style fully boxed frame, mainly because it's expected to carry 1 ton loads, just like the prior Hilux models.

The North American made Toyotas were largely designed by American designers, especially the latest ones like the 2005 Tacoma. They were given much leeway in which OEM manufactures they could use and in design. They were expected to see paved American roads for 99.999% of their life and that was considered in the design. But most importantly, especially in the case of the pick-ups, they were never going to be rated for more than 1/2 ton loads, so, unlike Japanese designed and built pick-ups, they could factor that into the design. And that's why we see things like C-channel frames on the Tacoma and Tundra, which are a big weight savings, compared to the 4Runner and Land Cruiser, which are much heavier, but heavier duty as well.

Just slapping a Toyota name on a design or a factory does not make for a high quality rig. Ask anyone who owns the famous Brazilian Bandeirante, the FJ40 design that lasted until 2001. It was total crap. They were famous for breaking down and falling apart, because, they used local OEM parts and design and couldn't match the quality of the Japanese built rigs. That's an extreme example, but it goes to show that Toyota doesn't have an international policy that rigs built outside of Japan have to meet Japanese built standards by 100%, like some folks assume.

I'm not saying that American built Toyotas are crap. I wouldn't hesitate to own a Tacoma. Especially the old models. But I would understand that the quality of that rig and it's design, while better than any other American sold mini-truck, is inferior in many ways to the older Toyota pick-ups and the Toyota pick-ups currently built overseas. If I had to buy another Toyota in the future, I would definitely feel much better if it was designed and made in Japan. That's just my opinion.



Agreed... spot on...

Sadly...


Brian K. Gallus
I have nothing important to say.
Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: Brian894X4] #564279 02/07/05 11:33 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
the only thing i worry about the new cruiser is if it is a unibody or not.

if it has a frame, its workable IMO. the only reason i worry about it is because you say it will be lower priced like the rav4. the rav4 and the highlander (if you want to call them SUV's) are both made in japan along with the 4runner.

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. #564280 02/07/05 11:51 PM
Anonymous
Unregistered
Does anyone have a link to the concept photos?

Im excited!!!

thanks.

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. #564281 02/08/05 02:01 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,768
Brian894X4 Offline OP
Trail Leader
*****
Quote
Does anyone have a link to the concept photos?

Im excited!!!

thanks.


Just do an internet search for "Toyota FJ Cruiser" or "FJ Cruiser concept". You'll come up with a million websites and photos of the 2003 concept. But keep in mind, we're not sure just how much of the production model will be related to the concept model.


Last edited by Brian894X4; 02/08/05 02:06 AM.

[color:"blue"]My Toyota/Expedition Website[/color]
Foreign & Military Toyotas - Expedition 4x4s
Our historical explorations & much more

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: Brian894X4] #564282 02/08/05 02:28 AM
Anonymous
Unregistered
Cool, Thnaks for the info. Your site ROCKS by the way. I love the old railway, and mining expeditions. Very interesting stuff, keep it comming!

Last edited by dudeimarobot; 02/08/05 02:31 AM.
Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: bkg] #564283 02/08/05 02:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,192
DirtyHarry Offline
Toyota Moderator
Quote

Looked at a 97 40th, needed some work. Could have owned it for $8K. Could have owned a 96 in NICE shape for < 9K. Found a 93 w/o lockers that I could have owned for $7k. Friend just bought a 93 W/ lockers for 3K - needs some minor work.


How many miles are on these vehicles? Are we talking apples for apples? What does "needs work" mean? Mike Caskey bought a FJ80 with a blown headgasket for $2500, but that is not exactly what I am looking for. I couldn't find an FJ80 with lockers and under 100k miles around here for less than $14k, $17k was typical.

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: Brian894X4] #564284 02/08/05 02:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,192
DirtyHarry Offline
Toyota Moderator
Quote
Harry, not only did Toyota of Japan build front lockers for the 80 series, but also for dozens of different models of the 70 series as well. And they also offer them in certain models of the current 100 series, overseas. Whether they'll offer them in this rig or not, none of knows. And since we're picking on Japanese manufactures, don't forget about Nissan's overseas rigs, which were and are also equipped with F/R lockers.


You are right Brian, I've driven 70 series before (with DANA axles) and they are nice rigs, but none of that applies to us here in the US. Shame on Toyota for not bringing us a stout product, not Daimler Chysler. They stepped up to the plate and I don't think that it is fair to knock them for it.

Re: Count down to the unveiling of the new 2006 FJ Cruiser. [Re: jcssurf] #564285 02/08/05 02:40 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,192
DirtyHarry Offline
Toyota Moderator
Quote

I personally will keep waiting for an exceptional factory wheeler from Toyota (TRD tacoma is close). And until then, would spend the extra money I saved by NOT getting Pwagon or Rubicon, on some mods to a Tacoma that would make it virtually as capable.


One is too big, one is too small, whatever. Have you driven a Rubicon Unlimited? I have, and there is nothing on the market right now that will touch it. If you want to talk about prices then get a Samurai, the point here is that Toyota doesn't make something that comes close to those "piece of crap" Chryslers and hasn't for a long time. If you think that your Tacoma is going to keep up with bolt ons you are fooling yourself.

Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 12 13

Moderated by  4Crawler, 4x4Wire, kewlynx 







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 16 (0.005s) Memory: 0.6552 MB (Peak: 0.7827 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-02 22:18:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS