|
|
|
|
 Re: Dana 35 confused numbers....
[Re: BigJim]
#584904
03/26/05 04:47 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,175
OP
Body Damage is Cool
|
Thats nice... Thank you Big Jim.
91 Jeep Wrangler YJ, carpet, tires, trailer hitch. yea....
|
|
|
Re: Dana 35 confused numbers....
[Re: NCBBA2358]
#584905
03/26/05 09:07 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Line D2 could indicate that there are 3.07:1 gears, so, is the rear just a heavier case with the same gear set? Answered your own question. Yes, the rear axle is a heavier (debatable with the D35) everything with the same gear ratio (should be anyhow).
|
|
|
Re: Dana 35 confused numbers....
#584906
03/27/05 12:11 AM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
During the process of re-gearing to 3.73's (did the rear first) I decided I wanted to see how bad the whole system would sieze with different ratio's. I went to a parking lot with old crumbly asfalt and threw it in 4wd. I went from 5 to 0 like someone hit the brakes. If you have different ratio's, you'd know about it the first time you tried it in 4wd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.006s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.5931 MB (Peak: 0.6479 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-09 23:05:44 UTCValid HTML 5 and Valid CSS 