|
|
|
|
Re: OME 906 coils for 3rd gen
[Re: azrain]
#635171
08/11/05 04:45 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,205
OP
Body Damage is Cool
|
Is my impression correct that the 880/881s up front provide slightly over 2" of lift and the 890/891s in the rear provide closer to 3" (thus the need for a 1" spacer up front)?
I might try the 880/881s with no spacer and 906s in the rear along with a set of 265/75R16 (32") Dueler ATs and see how it works on the trail. Taking the leap to a 3" lift and 33" mud terrains might be too much of compromise on driveability and gas mileage with the stock 4.10 gears, not to mention the crawl ratio won't exactly be desireable since I have a manual trans.
I want the suspension to be slightly stiffer (~20%) than it is now--if I should be going a different route such as the Tundra TRD coilover setup up front in lieu of the OMEs, let me know!
2000 4Runner | 5-speed | E-locker | Tundra/OME 2" lift | Stubbs Sliders | Deckplate/TrueFlow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 3.361s Queries: 16 (3.359s) Memory: 0.6031 MB (Peak: 0.6361 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-05-27 00:40:17 UTCValid HTML 5 and Valid CSS