Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L? #636409 08/15/05 04:41 PM

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 509

SF Bay Area

Winston

Rock Warrior

I have a '95 LS with the 3.0L 24V engine. It has been extremely reliable, but it is a bit underpowered. One nice thing about my engine is that I do not have EGR. As previously noted I think the newer 3.5L engines with the SOHC would be the best bet. I believe the newer engines do not suffer from the valve seal problems like the older engines.

Last edited by Winston; 08/15/05 04:42 PM.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	Anonymous	08/14/05 06:03 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	Anonymous	08/14/05 07:19 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	justice	08/15/05 01:53 AM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	MontyMcV	08/15/05 01:42 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	Winston	08/15/05 04:41 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	Anonymous	08/15/05 10:42 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	bretwalda	08/16/05 05:19 AM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	DavidG	08/16/05 02:58 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	89raider	08/24/05 03:33 AM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	Yellowhammer	08/24/05 09:58 PM
Re: Is the 3.0L 24v engine MORE RELIABLE and 4x4 capable than 3.5L?	MontyMcV	08/25/05 03:02 PM

Moderated by 4x4Wire, Macka, Mudraider, off-roader, PHIL_, rxinhed

Hop To

4x4Wire Social: