|
|
Gen I 3.5 retro
#649037
09/22/05 03:09 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 136
OP
Wheeler
|
Im sure this has been asked but cannot find a post in the search. How tough is a 3.5 to GenI conversion? I found a totalled 3.5 Montero 22k miles complete eng,trans,transfer case for $700 and wondered how this would work vs. waiting for a 4.3.
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: Tycer]
#649038
09/22/05 03:39 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,227
Web Wheeler
|
I'm no expert but IMHO, you'll probably be looking at the entire drivetrain...
Engine, tranny xcase will be from the donor obviously.
Front & rear dif's were upsized for the 3.5 by the Mitsu so I'd do the same rather than use the gen I diff for it.
You'll also want the ECU & harness from the donor obviously.
Pro's will be all mitsu stuff
Con's, will be more work because you're doing an entire drivetrain swap as well.
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: off-roader]
#649039
09/22/05 03:41 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 136
OP
Wheeler
|
Very true. If I end up doing that much work I may as well get the 4.3 and have a bit more power.
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: off-roader]
#649040
09/22/05 04:07 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
Forum Moderator
|
Pro's will be all mitsu stuff
Con's, will be more work because you're doing an entire drivetrain swap as well.
LOL thats a pro?? The last thing I would EVER want to maintain would be a 3.5. how wmuch does that butterfly valve cost??
87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1 31's..Basically Stock
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: LandRaider]
#649041
09/22/05 04:31 AM
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,132
Trail Leader
|
There were a couple of 3.5 mits engine offered. The later one was a SOHC 24 valve with no butterfly n the intake track. On paper it looks to be a decent sized multi valve motor but is not as complex as the DOHC 3.5. October 1, 2003 -- Cypress, Calif. -- Both the Montero Sport LS and XLS are powered by a 3.5-liter, SOHC, 24-valve, V6 engine that produces 197 horsepower at 5000 rpm and 223 pound-feet of torque at 3500 rpm. This rugged V6 provides ample torque, responsiveness and pulling power under all conditions. The 3.5-liter V6 engine block and reciprocating assembly are strengthened by a reinforced web girdle that supports the main caps and crankshaft while helping to reduce engine vibration. A structurally supportive aluminum oil pan insulates against engine noise, strengthens the lower portion of the cylinder block and provides a stable foundation for attaching the transmission.
Long port intake runners facilitate the V6 engine's low-speed torque and responsiveness. The intake runners allow incoming air to build up speed and rush into the cylinders during the intake stroke. A thermostatically-controlled viscous-coupling cooling fan spins at low rpm, and disengages at higher rpm to reduce drag on the engine and help the engine to run quieter. Additionally, the V6 comes equipped with a dual-mass crankshaft pulley damper that helps quiet and smooth the engine.
web page If the price is right and it only has 20,000 miles it might be worth looking into.
Last edited by Kevin C; 09/22/05 04:47 AM.
87 Turbo Intercooled Raider, roller cam, torsen rear diff, LSD front diff, lockup auto with modified converter, V6 brakes, low transfer case gears...
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: Kevin C]
#649042
09/22/05 02:59 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 913
Rock Warrior
|
Do a search on the 6G74 or on my posts. I've thought about this swap in my Gen II and FrankR looked in to it, too. The 3.0 to 3.5 swap has been done in the 3000GT, so I'm sure it's possible here. Here's what I've found -
The 3.0 & 3.5 should have the same rear bolt pattern. FrankR tried to measure and thought there were a couple of boltholes different, but they done this swap in the 3000GT.
Both the 6G72 & 6G74 have the same bolt pattern on the crank. A flywheel or flex plate from one will bolt to the other.
The 3.0 heads will bolt on to a 3.5 block. On the 24V SOHC motors, both share the same head.
The 3.0 in the Gen I uses a distributor, while the 3.5 uses a coil pack.
Accessories are in different locations between the two.
The Gen II 3.0 & 3.5 use the same motor mounts but different adapters between the frame & motor mount. I'm sure this is due to the greater width of the 6G74.
I'm sure the drive train will hold up, if you're reasonable with the skinny pedal. Big Blue never had problems with his 4.3 swap and he used the stock smaller rear axle that's behind the 2.6.
Here's what I've always wanted to try but don't have the time or money to do. Take a 3.5 block, swap on the 3.0 12V heads (which includes the alternator mount and distributor), use the 3.5 lower plenum and the 3.0 upper plenum, use the stock 3.0 injection system, use/ modify the AC mount & PS pump mount from the 3.0, and use/modify the front belt covers from a 24V SOHC 3.5. This would give more power than a 3.0 without as many hassles as the 4.3 swap would entail. YMMV <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Lee '94 LS, 3.0 V6, Auto, completely stock
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: Lee N]
#649043
09/22/05 03:08 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 868
Rock Warrior
|
Big Blue never had problems with his 4.3 swap
Well...except for those leaf springs he keeps bending from the torque <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/ignore.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
97 Rodeo
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: 4WDJOE]
#649044
09/22/05 03:42 PM
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,132
Trail Leader
|
The leaf spring bending issue is actually prettty common. My last Raider (Red Raider) had it before I swaped in the turbo motor.
I'm not sure what the prevous owner did...But he had a monster sized hitch on it. The bend on mine happened at the front spring eyes, they had a bit of an upturn. Some type of snubber about 3" after the spring eye would help.
A number of other trucks have these limiters.
My first Raider never had the bending problem (Blue Raider)it just totaly broke a spring. Seemded to be a age / corrosion problem.
It's not something I would worry about. I was never totaly sure if it was a heat treat issue, abuse problem or what. I think the factory did offer a heavy duty leaf spring.
Just remembered, if he has a V6 Gen 1 he has coil springs... Never mind <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> Need more Coffee <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/zombie.gif" alt="" />
Kevin
87 Turbo Intercooled Raider, roller cam, torsen rear diff, LSD front diff, lockup auto with modified converter, V6 brakes, low transfer case gears...
|
|
Re: Gen I 3.5 retro
[Re: Kevin C]
#649045
09/22/05 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
Forum Moderator
|
Thats Exactly where mine bend kevin.
I bent them when I had my LTB's on there, and my 4.3
<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> enough power to break a cv axle stub off at the differential!!, and bend those leafs. Thats a great idea about the leaf spring snubber.
87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1 31's..Basically Stock
|
|
|
|