|
|
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
[Re: 4x4yotaman]
#665266
11/12/05 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 252
Mudrunner
|
By not using the cat you might be hurting the environment but not by a noticable amount. If every vehicle on the road had no cat then there would be a problem. However the actuall # of vehicles running with no cats is a drop in the ocean. The 02 sensor is in front of the cat so the truck won't run any worse without a cat. It will probably run a little better. I'm not encouraging you to do it but it would run better. Ever seen a race car or truck with a cat on it? I'm sure the tree huggers are gonna rail me on this post.
85 SR5 4runner....Too many hours of work put into it, Hacked, Beaten, and Still running after all I've put it through
87 Turbo Pickup...Bought Her for $500 put another $500 in her and she's running like a dream.
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
[Re: swamprunner]
#665267
11/12/05 03:59 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,010
Body Damage is Cool
|
im just saying, if you say if everyone had that mentality then a lot more people would be running w/o cats and it adds up. if you look at the emissions levels of a vehicle w/ and w/o a properly working cat it is drastic.
87 22R PU, 2? body lift, 33? BFG muds, 4.88's, F&R Lock-Rights, Rancho Shocks, EB's Street RV Head w/ 268 Cam, LCE Header, 2" to 2 1/4" exhaust, Flowmaster 50 series, Magnaflow high flow cat, complete Herculined SR5 interior, V6 BB, MC, and calipers.
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
[Re: swamprunner]
#665268
11/13/05 08:55 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 827
Rock Warrior
|
Ever seen a race car or truck with a cat on it? I'm sure the tree huggers are gonna rail me on this post. That's why ski-doo/quad manufactures will be trying to incorporate cats from 2008 or something & on. Actually, try treeplanting for a season, you will know what's a real tree hugger! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
Last edited by allochris; 11/13/05 08:56 AM.
91-22re(408xxxkm & counting with a rebuilt long block)- Flatbed/ Camper/33x10.5BFG-AT/Open 4:88/1.5"BJS/ +2"Shackles/Add-a-Leaf/AirLift/Dual-Batteries
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
[Re: allochris]
#665269
11/13/05 03:11 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 78
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
At my shop we bend pipe for exhaust systems. Bigger pipe is not necessarily better. The right sized pipe will draw the exhaust out of an engine, too big a pipe will allow it to slow down and cause back pressure. I run a Hedman header with 2" pipe back to a NAPA Quietflow muffler with a tail pipe. I did weld in a cat, even though we don't have emissions testing here yet. One county away, but not here. Of course, the cat is only $30 my cost. But here is one thing to consider: Having the cat mounted close to the collector keeps your O2 sensor hot during extended idle and off idle running, which means you stay in closed loop.
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
[Re: swamprunner]
#665270
11/13/05 03:55 PM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
By not using the cat you might be hurting the environment but not by a noticable amount. If every vehicle on the road had no cat then there would be a problem. However the actuall # of vehicles running with no cats is a drop in the ocean. Ok, you had to know you were setting your self up to get some heat over this. I hope everyone doesn't get this attitude. If so then the entire US will be one big smog fest. I live in Oklahoma were there is no state inspections. and since this was incorperated in 2001 the number of people running around with out cats has increased dramatically. Not only hurting the enviornment but also horrible noise pollution with all of these little rice burners with chrome fart pipes. I too used to believe that no cat was better. But have grown to realize, uless you are trying to shave off a couple tenths off your quarter mile time, keep your cat on. They make high flow units that will replace your stocker if you want too. Here is a pic of a good flowing system using a cat. I since have cut the pipe off about 8" past the muffler cause I didn't like the pipe out the back. It has a header with 2 1/4" pipe and a Dynomax super Turbo. It performs great and sounds great. ![[Linked Image]](http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y40/89Mudslinger/muffler8.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y40/89Mudslinger/muffler9.jpg)
|
|
Re: Exhaust size question
#665271
11/16/05 04:24 AM
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I did my own test on my DD Rodeo, 2.6l. W/out cat my mileage per tankfull increased about 25 miles, while the top wot speed increased 10 miles. I think what the cat is doing is burning the small amount of hc left (don't really know how much) in the discharge. Also used to remove egr circuits on bikes (F-3 and F-4 mainly) which added about 18-20% increase. So I use a hollow cat, with a tube trough it, here in Cali is expensive to be cough tampering with emission related components. I had run leaded gas on my Swift GTI, which had no impact on either performance or economy... Just my .2 cents
|
|
|
|
|
|