The local rules here in Vancouver (Canada) are that the vehicle is tested to the chassis year requirements.
Since the 4.3 produced 1/10 the pollutants of the 2.6, it was an easy pass.
If tested to the engine year, it would have passed too.
An engine/exhaust has to be pretty suspect here to fail.

I took mine through the test (dyno'd, 5 gasses) right after it was running, just to see if I was due for a "surprise" next year, and it did just fine. The tech's updated the records to show the new engine size, and were curious about the swap, but otherwise nothing caused any problems.


Don `87 Mitsu 2dr, Rubicon survivor, GModified.