Quote
I bet the increased compression alone would get you pretty close to the horsepower goal. Though this would have to be done carefully as the Montero ECU is expecting the lazy CR


Expect an increase of only 5HP by going from the stock 8.9:1 to 10.0:1....

CR Horsepower Change

You would get a much crisper throttle response, but the ECU would be somewhat helpful on ignition timing issues - particularly EGR equipped models. I don't know what the timing curves of other 3.0L engines are, but the '89 3.0L Federal model with base iginition timing set at 5 degrees BTDC runs ~ 40 degrees BTDC max under light load cruise (downhill) and is retarded to ~ 15 degrees BTDC under load/uphill/overdrive (no downshift) when all manifold vacuum is dumped around 2000 rpms.

IMO, for such a modest increase in HP, it's not worth the fuel cost of increasing CR unless other modifications are also made - like full head porting, larger intake valves, a different cam profile and an ignition timing controller - expensive, since it's mostly all custom work. A resulting change to low-end torque output from a different cam pattern would also be a question mark on driveability.

There are 2 reasonable answers for better all-round performance from the 3.0L in a truck - a blower or a stroker crank - both also expensive. IMO, anything less is probably a waste of time, effort and money.

Frank


'89 [color:"white"]G-Raider[color:"white"] [color:"black"]Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 172k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, Lifeline AGM, Rust-Oleum