The article was published last Friday (2/10/06) so I assume it's still up in the air though it does say it's unlikely to be approved. They also call it the potentially largest such sale in decades so I guess they have gotten away with it before.It get's me where a proponant says it's OK because the parcels are surrounded by private land! DUH! What Natl forest or Park is Not surrounded by private land? Freakin sassafrassin so&sos! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />