Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 7 of 16 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 15 16
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763604 11/09/06 07:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
In your beloved R/C experiment, you continue to use the appendage attached to the treadmill as the prime mover. Of course, if the plane is propelled by the object that is in contact with the treadmill, there will be no take off speed. However, if the prime mover (read the propeller) is not coupled to the tread mill in any way, it doesn't have to overpower the treadmill, because all it is doing is sitting on it. In your R\C example, the aircraft is mercilessly bound to the treadmill by your iron grip, therefore it is not the same situation as the frictionless bearing condition.

I don't need 400 pages. I see that my madness is perfectly clear... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/notooth.gif" alt="" />

Why can't you see through the beer goggles??? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763605 11/09/06 07:41 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
LandRaider Offline
Forum Moderator
*****
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Anyway, the plane flies off the conveyor belt as pretty as you please - so long as the wheel bearings don't seize. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/shiner.gif" alt="" />

Frank


Thank you Frank. Anyone who does not understand this needs to REREAD the post, and think about it for a while. Its stated VERY clearly how, and why the plane will be able to lift off, and fly away.


Anyone who doesn't see this needs to be mercilessly beat about the thing that's supposed to be a head on their shoulders... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


Come on over...

[Linked Image]

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />

I believe this may be the problem of some to comprehend the terms of the original word problem. My answer still stands with the understanding that

A) The experiment begins with zero work (aircraft engines off, conveyor belt off)
B) No wind
C) Zero friction in the wheels
D) Ground speed is understood as relative to a point on the ground - not on the conveyor
E) Infinite technology to commence the experiment I.E. (and by far the most important) the conveyor belt moves exactly to the induced speed of the plane at precisely the same time.

Gravity holds the plane to ground. The free spinning wheels are a conveyor in themselves - allowing the plane to create forward motion without (in our case) any friction.

In our windless scenario the thrust has to propel this object forward to take off speed - which is also ground speed.

Now remember the original post? The conveyor matches the speed of the plane. All you Yes-It-Willers are assuming that at some point the planes thrust overpowers the the speed of the belt. It doesn't. It aint going anywhere. And in fact the conveyor will hardly move.

Again I defer to my R/C airplane experiment -

1) Hold it above your head at full throttle and let it go - that thing on your head will be mercilessly beat <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" />.

2)Now step on a 500ft treadmill, power it up and start running matching speeds so you remain stationary relative to a linear space (on the ground NOT the treadmill), hold the plane above your head and gently let go - again you will feel pain.

3)Now get on it again. Put the treadmill on slow and start running. Eventually if you are fast enough you will gain enough speed over the treadmill to provide enough airflow over the wings to produce lift - the ground speed (speed relative to the ground NOT the treadmill) is equal to the TakeOff speed. If you let go the plane will fly away.

BUT #3 IS NOT THE SITUATION POSTED IN THE PROBLEM

This riddle is #2.

If I still haven't converted you there is no hope.

There is nothing new under the sun

Can we beat 400 pages? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />


Are you playing devils advocate? or seriously do not understand? I'm about to give up.


87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1
31's..Basically Stock
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: Oyaji_Jon] #763606 11/09/06 07:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,634
bretwalda Offline
Roll Me Over
How do you possibly infer?

If I wasnt clear enough - do the said experiment with open palm - plane resting on the palm. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" />

The prime mover is indeed coupled to the treadmill thanks to gravity - the entire craft is one body, one object, one piece of mass - how are the wheels magically independent of the rest of the mass that it shares?


concreteprinter.com
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763607 11/09/06 08:03 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
They are a separate rotational mass coupled to a rigid body by frictionless bearings. The fuselage IS NOT coupled to the treadmill because is is simply resting upon it. Remove the wheels and cover the treadmill in a perfect lubricant that cancels friction and the treadmill will move beneath the fuselage sitting atop it without disturbing the mass at rest! Allow the propeller to start moving and you get motion out of the fuselage that will eventually allow flight regardless of how fast the treadmill is moving because it has no effect on the plane anyway.

Come on, man...


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763608 11/09/06 08:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
Quote
The prime mover is indeed coupled to the treadmill thanks to gravity - the entire craft is one body, one object, one piece of mass - how are the wheels magically independent of the rest of the mass that it shares?


Because of the absense of friction, gravity will simply oppose any vertical motion. Two forces perpendicualar to each other cannot bind two objects without a rigid coupling or friction. The wheels ARE independent of the horizontal equation and simply act as vertical stabilizers upon which the plane sits (again in the absense of friction).


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763609 11/09/06 08:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
Quote
If I wasnt clear enough - do the said experiment with open palm - plane resting on the palm. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" />


If that is the case, the plane will move off of your stationary hand while you sweat your a$$ off on the treadmill. The fact that the airplane hits you in the head at that point is simply because there is not enough lift achieved by the time it runs off of your hand to overcome gravity. Maybe that experience would be your equivalent of Newton's apple. Maybe you should try it... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763610 11/09/06 08:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
LandRaider Offline
Forum Moderator
*****
Quote

If I wasnt clear enough - do the said experiment with open palm - plane resting on the palm. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" />


The plane will power off your palm(WITH THE AIR PROPULSION SYSTEM), and fall onto the ground.

Put the RC plane on the treadmill / runway, and let it power up, and it will gain speed irrelevant to the treadmills reverse speed, and generate enough airspeed to lift off. Its not gonna happen instantly.

Say it takes 120 (windspeed)knots to generate enough lift to lift off... the treadmill will be going EXACTLY that speed in reverse as the plane lifts off of it.

The WHEELS WILL NOT HOLD THE PLANE FROM GOING FOWARD.

a Conventional car will not be able to move at all

a JET powered car would be able to move because the propulsion is not comming from the treadmill.

Can it get any more simple? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />


87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1
31's..Basically Stock
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: Oyaji_Jon] #763611 11/09/06 08:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,634
bretwalda Offline
Roll Me Over
Quote
Quote
If I wasnt clear enough - do the said experiment with open palm - plane resting on the palm. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" />


The fact that the airplane hits you in the head at that point is simply because there is not enough lift achieved by the time it runs off of your hand to overcome gravity.


And why is that? Because speed relative to a point on the ground in stationary air is not enough. Its not enough because in this case my running speed cannot overcome the the opposite reaction to the treadmill. In the case of the riddle it is because the work done by the thrust of the engine is cancelled by a spontaneous equal and opposite reaction.

Quote
Maybe that experience would be your equivalent of Newton's apple. Maybe you should try it... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


I have - have you? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/butwiggle.gif" alt="" /> All those teen years spent on pricey gizmos apparently were not in vain.

You clearly state gravity has a part in this but not in the riddle - you need to catch some Z's bro. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/drunk.gif" alt="" />

Frictionless bearings I will accept. But you are implying that there is no gravity in the riddle - which is ludicrous.


concreteprinter.com
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763612 11/09/06 09:03 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
LandRaider Offline
Forum Moderator
*****
Quote
In the case of the riddle it is because the work done by the thrust of the engine is cancelled by a spontaneous equal and opposite reaction.


This is where you're missing it man.

How the hell is work done by a jet engine acting on ***NON treadmill air*** canceled out by a treadmill?

NOW If the plane were in a wind tunnel, and the wind "followed" the plane at the same speed the plane went then it woudl never take off.

Jet engine makes 40,000lbs of thrust....propels the plane foward(against the treadmill) which is rolling on bearings, and wheels that might take 40lbs of thrust to overcome...

I dont care HOW fast or slow the treadmill is EVER going in either direction... Its totally irelevant. The bearings in the wheels of the plane allow almost 0 friction.


87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1
31's..Basically Stock
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: Oyaji_Jon] #763613 11/09/06 09:12 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,479
StockRaider Offline
Roll Me Over
***
WHY IS THIS THREAD GETTING SO MANY REPLIES!!!
Jet engines thrust plane forward, NOT THE WHEELS!. Freewheels on a plane are just that, they spin freely so the treadmill has no effect on the plane movement when taking off.


Richard E
1989 Montero - Stock-ish
1989 V6 Auto Raider - 5.3 Vortech Swap.
1987 Mitsubishi Starion 2.6t, soon to be 3.5
1983 Honda XL600R
Page 7 of 16 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 15 16

Moderated by  4x4Wire, 52degrees, Adam F, Axe Man, kewlynx 







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.6644 MB (Peak: 0.7814 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-05-29 22:47:12 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS