Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 12 of 16 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: LandRaider] #763654 11/10/06 10:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
LandRaider Offline
Forum Moderator
*****
OOps double treadmill post.

Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763655 11/10/06 01:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
FrankR Offline
Web Wheeler
****
Quote
Picture the glider with gear wheels - and the treadmill with matching gear tread. When the planes touches they mesh perfectly.

It doesnt matter what speed it comes in - wheel bearings frictionless, perfect contact i.e. no skip or slip of the wheel - it will stop do you concur?


Now you're changing the parameters.... again. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> In this case, the gears on the plane's tread will mesh with the teeth on the treadmill. The only way to gain sychronization would be to have the plane's wheels driven. The drive mechanism would have the effect of locking the wheel to the treadmill and the result would be a broken gear as the assembly shears from the airplane on impact. The gear would stop, but the rest of the plane would continue down the treadmill runway. If the gear was strong enough, everything would stop if the force applied by the treadmill equalled the force of the plane..... BUT.... that scenario would not be considered WHEELS..... it's now GEARS!!

Quote
Picture the glider with gear wheels - and the treadmill with matching gear tread. When the planes touches they mesh perfectly.

It doesnt matter what speed it comes in - wheel bearings frictionless, perfect contact i.e. no skip or slip of the wheel - it will stop do you concur?


No, the glider won't stop - wheels or no wheels. All that will happen with a glider on wheels, is the wheels will now turn twice as fast when the treadmill matches the glider's speed in reverse direction.... if the treadmill direction and speed is the same as the glider, the wheels don't turn at all.

Quote
Momentum is mass times velocity correct?

So the plane 100 lbs.

Velocity of the plane matches velocity of treadmill. They cancel out. Zero.

100x0 is zero - no momentum.

No momentum means no forward motion.


Right there is where you're getting wrapped around the axle, Phil. In order for energy to transfer, force must be applied by one thing acting on another. If the treadmill had a 20' high steel wall mounted to the tread that moved as a part of the tread in the opposite direction to the plane's travel.... and if the mass of the wall was the same as the plane.... and if the wall was moving at the same speed as the plane.... and if the treadmill decoupled from its drive mechanism just before impact (better if the wall decoupled from the tread via frictionless bearings)..... and if the plane flew into the wall......... then yes, energy transfer would balance and everything would come to an instant stop. But what you have in the original parameters is an inability for the treadmill to transfer force to the plane equal to the plane's thrust because the bearings allow the wheels to turn.

Think of it like getting stuck on slick wet grass or clay - no matter how fast you spin the wheels, you can't transfer power and when you can't transfer power laterally, no movement can be expected.

You should ponder why airplanes have wheels....... one reason is to prevent (or control) energy transfer on landing. Otherwise, the event becomes a crash where the energy of the flying airplane is absorbed by the earth and the resulting force destroys the plane and kills the occupants. The second reason is to negate frictional forces between the airplane and the ground.... to allow the thrust of the airplane's engine to build momentum and move the plane over the ground at an increasing rate of speed in order to achieve enough air speed over the wing to generate the amount lift needed for takeoff.

Frank

Last edited by FrankR; 11/10/06 05:42 PM.
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: LRJ4x4] #763656 11/10/06 05:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,950
cmonty72 Offline
Trail Leader
****
Quote
I just asked a Navy Pilot with a Masters in Aerospace Engineering. He is going to e-mail me a reply <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/patriot.gif" alt="" />
Gee whiz! I hope he gets the right answer.

I'll ask the guy with the "homeless and hungry" sign down the street. I think he has knowledge of such voodoo. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />

Last edited by cmonty72; 11/10/06 05:57 PM.

96 Montero LS 24V DOHC 3.0L.
98 Montero 24v SOHC 3.5L, factory rear locker, Winter/tow package.
63 Jaguar XKE 3.8L FHC
2000 Mercedes-Benz e430
07 fj cruiser
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: cmonty72] #763657 11/10/06 06:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,871
onebadtrooper Offline
Body Damage is Cool
I'll say it again... the plane will take off <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


Try this.
Put on a pair of roller skates and get on a treadmill.
Then have a rope tied to somthing in front of the treadmill
Try to pull your self forward.


89 trooper, tera low t-case gears,5.38's, 3" indy4xsus lift3"body lift,safari snorkle,warn winch,custom bull bar,custom rock sliders,warn hubs,35x13.50r15,custom rear bumper trooper pics
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: onebadtrooper] #763658 11/10/06 07:08 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,956
lee_raider Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Or even better yet..............




Quote
I'll say it again... the plane will take off <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


Try this.
Put on a pair of roller skates and get on a treadmill.
Then have a jet engine tied to your head. See if you stay motionless once it is fired up. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


The only time I may have seen something similar to that, was .....Wile E Coyote in a cartoon once. And he only stayed motionless for a second, then took off. And of course...... promptly fell off a cliff.<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/drunk.gif" alt="" />

But yes, he did take off. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />


Two MRI's and a CAT scan....it's confirmed. I'm just not right in the head.
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: bretwalda] #763659 11/10/06 07:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
Quote
Momentum is mass times velocity correct?

So the plane 100 lbs.

Velocity of the plane matches velocity of treadmill. They cancel out. Zero.

100x0 is zero - no momentum.

No momentum means no forward motion.


You said it...

M=mv. In this case, you are saying the v = v(plane) - v(tread). In order for this to be the case, the wheels MUST have an effect on the forward motion of the plane. We have all agreed that the wheels are FREELY spinning, so how can they? The plane's velocity has an effect on tread velocity because that is how the original problem is stated.

New equation: F=ma

Force acting on wheel:
F1 = m(plane)*g {downward}
F2 = m(plane)*g {upward because ground pushes back equally}
F1=F2 and cancel out

F3 = m(wheel)*a(wheel) {rotational acceleration of round mass due to contact with the treadmill when it moves. This acceleration is purely rotational and has minimal effect on the plane because of a small amount of lateral translation while it accelerates. Remember: FRICTIONLESS bearings}

Forces on plane:

F1 = m(plane)*g {downward}
F2 = m(plane)*g {upward because ground pushes back equally}
F1=F2 and cancel out

F3 = m(plane)*a(plane from thrust) {forward resulting in the only force acting on the plane and causing forward motion}

Can you argue that a force that doesn't act on the plane alters it's stationary status? Just curious... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/notooth.gif" alt="" />


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: lee_raider] #763660 11/10/06 07:59 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,664
Alex Kogan Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Phil just thik about it. Plane's engine creates a thrust - a force applied in one direction. Bearings are frictionless as we agreed. So there is no force opposing thrust from the engine. Just remember the phisics: If object is exposed to force acting in one direction without opposing force reacting, object will move/accelerate. F = m*a.

How about if we put rocket on wheels onto treadmill. Is it going to move? Or for example, if we magnetically levitate plane just above the surface just maybe 1/16" will it fly away?
Yes it will!


92 SR, 285/75R16 Yoko MT ARB locker GAST compressor AirLift 1000 MM10500 Snorkel custom rear bumper
02 Montero LS died protecting the master
08 PowerWagon (stock!)
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: Alex Kogan] #763661 11/10/06 10:28 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,121
PartyTruck Offline
Body Damage is Cool
I think this riddle with the plane, the glider and the helicopter in the elevator have all the same answare as the one I'm throwing at you now:

"How long does it take a woman to reach orgasm?"

Solution will be posted later


1987 SWB Pajero 2.5 TDI on 31" rubber waiting for a hip replacement and bigger shoes
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: PartyTruck] #763662 11/10/06 10:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,950
cmonty72 Offline
Trail Leader
****
Women can have orgasms? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


96 Montero LS 24V DOHC 3.0L.
98 Montero 24v SOHC 3.5L, factory rear locker, Winter/tow package.
63 Jaguar XKE 3.8L FHC
2000 Mercedes-Benz e430
07 fj cruiser
Re: OT Plane on a Treadmill [Re: PartyTruck] #763663 11/10/06 10:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,272
Oyaji_Jon Offline
Roll Me Over
***
Quote
I think this riddle with the plane, the glider and the helicopter in the elevator have all the same answare as the one I'm throwing at you now:

"How long does it take a woman to reach orgasm?"

Solution will be posted later


That's easy, there is no answer. There is no such thing. It's a myth to drive us crazy, keep us feeling guilty and cause us to buy the ladies whatever it is that they want... <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/notooth.gif" alt="" />


73
-Jon
KJ6GVM

As seen on Expedition with TX plates: VEGETARIAN - An old Indian word for poor hunter

Grampa's Trooper
1974 FJ40
1987 FJ60
Page 12 of 16 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Moderated by  4x4Wire, 52degrees, Adam F, Axe Man, kewlynx 







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.008s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.6626 MB (Peak: 0.7739 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-05-29 22:46:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS