|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: LandRaider]
#777340
01/05/07 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,896
Trail Leader
|
I bet the 95SR rear 9.25in rear diff with 1.4in 31 spline shafts will stand up to 38s fairly well.
I am running 36s with a 2.4 4banger with 5.29 axle gears, it's not too bad on road.
I just want to tell you both good luck, and we're all counting on you.
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: Scottie2113]
#777341
01/05/07 09:34 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
Forum Moderator
|
For those that are interested, I used the online ratio calculator with the following inputs:
old tire: 30 new tire: 35 old ratio: 4.2 (with t case in High range)
the result is a ratio of 4.9 in the diffs to keep the same overall ratio. So even on the highway with 4.90's in the diffs, you can spin 35's with the exact same overall ratio and feel as stock montero gen II. so instead of changing my entire engine and a whole bunch of other stuff to make a new engine work, all I had to do was put 4.90's in the diffs and even while in high range, I can spin 35's with the EXACT same overall ratio as a stock gen II montero.
scottie No you can't. The RATIO is gonna be the same. But you're going to have a slower vehicle. It's prob going to be fine, and you'll be able to do the same stuff you did before, BUT don't think for a second that everything is a wash, and it is going to be the same. You can reduce the ratio all you want, but there is alot more to the whole system that you are missing. It's not as simple as JUST reducing the gear ratio. You're not going to have the same acceleration, or decel as before, and you are effectivly going to lose power overall.
87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1 31's..Basically Stock
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: LandRaider]
#777342
01/05/07 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 568
Rock Warrior
|
If the effective ratio is the same, what else is there to overcome?
1) The additional inertia of the heavier tires/wheels
2) Maybe a very small different coefficient of friction -- tire to road friction is small, because it's roughly the same weight vehicle on a bigger tire contact patch (less friction over a bigger area), plus probably a little more internal friction in a bigger piece of rubber, but that can't amount to much.
What am I missing?
90 LWB Montero, 270k, 265/75R16, 16x8 ARE Bajas, Budget Lift, Towbar, Aux Brakes (towed with camper), Jotto Desk, remote oil filter 92 bone stock base model beater Parting out 4 more
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: TommyM]
#777343
01/05/07 11:37 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,950
Trail Leader
|
Does'nt "Partytruck" run 38s on his GenI? His is a oil-burner, but he did a three inch BL and got them under there. Link to post with pics
Last edited by cmonty72; 01/05/07 11:42 PM.
96 Montero LS 24V DOHC 3.0L. 98 Montero 24v SOHC 3.5L, factory rear locker, Winter/tow package. 63 Jaguar XKE 3.8L FHC 2000 Mercedes-Benz e430 07 fj cruiser
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: LandRaider]
#777344
01/06/07 01:26 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8,557
Forum Moderator
|
THE ONLY EXCEPTION to these rules are if you live in Iceland. Possible, but not practical. 38s on IFS?? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
87 Raider 4D56td v5MT1 31's..Basically Stock
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: LandRaider]
#777345
01/06/07 02:00 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,049
Body Damage is Cool
|
Look guys, more horsepower would be great, but I just don't feel like going through all the time and money to transplant a new engine when the one I have is enough for me, especially since I am going to have an overall crawl ratio of 15.4!!! Can you say 200 hp stump puller????!!!!! <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/notooth.gif" alt="" />
for those that are wondering how i got 15.4:
4.9(diff)X3.15(tcase)=15.4
97 Montero SR w/Mitsu Adj Shocks & Rear Diff Lock ARB Front Diff Lock 4.9 Ring/Pinion 3.15 transfer box 43:1 crawl ratio 2" suspen lift 2" body lift 2" Gas Tank Lift 35x12.5 MTRs 15x10 Wheels Rock Sliderz ARB front bumper w/12k winch Custom rear bumper
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: off-roader]
#777346
01/06/07 04:13 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 259
Mudrunner
|
When I had the stock Mitsubishi axles I was running 33" tires and snapping the axles like toothpicks, especially the front.
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: Scottie2113]
#777347
01/06/07 04:23 AM
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,281
Roll Me Over
|
...uhhhh, usually you would express the final crawl ratio as: 1st gear ratio x tcase low x diff ratio...
(Not trying to sound toooo nit-picky here.)
With a M/T, 50:1 is good, and >100:1 is fantastic, with an A/T 35:1 is good, an >80:1 is fantastic.
So the basic Gen1 A/T = 2.826 x 1.944 x 4.625 = 25.4:1, which is nothing too special. Hence the usefullness of the 3.15 tcase gears = 2.826 x 3.15 x 4.625 = 41.2:1
On the 4.3 swap with GM A/T and tcase and Mitsu diffs = 3.060 x 2.72 x 4.625 = 38.5:1 The GM tcase can get a 4.0:1 swapped in from TerraLow, and then give me 3.060 x 4.0 x 4.625 = 56.6:1, which starts to get pretty serious crawl.
Adding a 2nd tcase/or crawl box or KluneV underdrive (if you got room) would multiply everything up by those extra gears, which are usually 2.7:1 or 4.0:1, which gets you into the truly excellent crawl ratios! So my "dream" system would be a 2.7:1 KluneV added to my existing 2.72:1 GM tcase which would give 3.060 x 2.72 x 2.7 x 4.652 = 103.9:1, which would give me a truly excellent final crawl ratio... But I doubt I'd ever need it.
But fun to do the math, though! Oddly enough, I've yet to see anyone correct for tire size, though. And that also comes into play here...
Last edited by don; 01/06/07 04:25 AM.
Don `87 Mitsu 2dr, Rubicon survivor, GModified.
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: don]
#777348
01/06/07 04:56 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
Web Wheeler
|
Oddly enough, I've yet to see anyone correct for tire size, though. And that also comes into play here... Then, to complete the picture, you'd have to consider engine rpm - but what you'd ultimately want to know is how fast (or in this case, how slow) you can go. So - to be on a level playing field, all measured contestants (it is a contest, right?) would have to peg the rpms at the same level - say 650 rpms (to be fair to the A/Ts). Then, of course, the M/T folks would try to slip the clutch... the A/T guys would apply the brakes.... and all would be instantly criticized by the others as cheaters. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> A low crawl ratio is nice - but in the end, it all boils down to whether or not you can get where you want to go..... or not..... and maybe how you look in the doings. Frank <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />
'89 [color:"white"]G-Raider[color:"white"] [color:"black"]Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 172k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, Lifeline AGM, Rust-Oleum
|
|
Re: Has anyone ever......?
[Re: FrankR]
#777349
01/06/07 05:22 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,727
Web Wheeler
|
My 2.6 will turn those tires no problem, down hill both ways in 4 Low, reverse <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
Sawzall offer still stands...you will love it Dewalt 18v <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
98 Montero with cold weather package 96 Toyota Land Cruiser, fully locked Mall Machine :-)
|
|
|
|