|
|
|
|
2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
#784486
01/30/07 02:00 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
I am contemplating buying a used 1999 Tacoma 2.7L 4cyl, auto, 4X4, Exc cab. I am unfamiliar with the Toyota 4cylinder engines. Specs say towing is to 5000lbs. Are they good for occassional towing of a 17ft boat, and carrying some light contracting supplies without bogging down? The Tacoma I'm interested in has 79,000 miles and is one owner,and I hate to pass it up, but yet I don't want to get stuck with a wimpy engine. I'm hoping to save a little gas too. Thank you for any and all comments.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: brink]
#784487
01/30/07 03:08 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Mudrunner
|
I recently went from a 1992 3.0 V6 to a 2000 with a 2.7. IMHO the 2.7 is a lot better than the 3.0 and faster. We will see when I hook up my 17' boat. If driving empty is any indication, it should work as well.
Now, the 3.4 makes a lot more power and torque so.... It is probably a lot better than the 2.7. I was happy with my 3.0 and my 2.7 is as good or better. I had the same situation and took the newer truck. I am happy with my 2.7. I probably would be happier with a 3.4 but you have to take the deals as they come....
I bet the 2.7 is good for more miles. Its roots go back to the 22R. Where the 3.4's roots go back to the 3.0. Mine had 200k on the ticker when I sold it and was running strong so the 3.4 may not be that bad.
2000 Ext Cab SR5 4WD 2.7L 5-speed.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: brink]
#784488
01/30/07 08:54 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 217
Wheeler
|
If you're going to be towing and hauling stuff then get the 3.4L V6.
Last edited by humanoid; 01/30/07 08:55 AM.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: humanoid]
#784489
01/30/07 01:45 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 684
Rock Warrior
|
I have gotten up to 21 mpg on my 3.4L and I definitely like the engine. It has been running strong, I haven't had any experience with the 2.4 or 2.7L but I know the 22RE is a little lacking in power.
98' Toyota Tacoma SR5 Manual Xtra Cab, Slight Lift Maine Rules!
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: DentedTacoma]
#784490
01/30/07 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Mudrunner
|
The other thing that I forgot to add yesterday:
I have done a lot of work on my 3.0 and some on friends 3.4's. My 2.7 is WAY easier to work on and things under the hood are a lot nicer.
The 3.4 also has that nasty timing belt that will need to be changed and that is no small job. Been there, done that. Probably the worst one I have done as far as stuff that had to be removed. OK, so my 3.0 was the worst.
2000 Ext Cab SR5 4WD 2.7L 5-speed.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: brink]
#784491
01/30/07 01:58 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 837
Rock Warrior
|
I get 23 mpg highway on my '04 x-cab w/2.7L. I have heard of others getting an average of 17-20 mpg with the 3.4L.
'04 Taco x-cab 3RZ FE stock (daily driver) '90 x-cab 22RE stock '82 Hilux 6" lift (ACES HI) '82 2-Hiluxs' Rally Edition (parts) '81 Hilux 3" lift (parts/restore)
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: averkam]
#784492
01/30/07 04:54 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Thanks for all the great info. Thanks avercam. I like the idea that the 2.7 is easier to work on.I will be test driving it soon, so I'll see what kind of power it has to offer. It's an auto trans. which may be ok for what I need.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: ACES_HI]
#784493
01/30/07 06:11 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,060
Trail Leader
|
I get 23 mpg highway on my '04 x-cab w/2.7L. I have heard of others getting an average of 17-20 mpg with the 3.4L. That sounds about right..My 99 gets about 17-22 with the 3.4. If its steady driving at 65-72 mph, I'm around 23-24 highway.
"Coal and people have been our two biggest exports for a long time, which has definitely shaped how we think of ourselves." Scott Hill, WV native and historian.
99 TacoTRD 177K
Montani Semper Liberi
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: RichinROA]
#784494
01/30/07 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Mudrunner
|
I only get 18-19 out of my 2.7. I drive 90% highway to and from work and it is a 27 mile one way drive. I expected better. I do drive 75ish mph. Would slowing down be that much better?
I do not have a lift and I have a tonnue cover on the bed.
2000 Ext Cab SR5 4WD 2.7L 5-speed.
|
|
Re: 2.7L 4cyl VS. 3.4L 6cyl Need Help Deciding!!!
[Re: averkam]
#784495
01/31/07 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 837
Rock Warrior
|
I only get 18-19 out of my 2.7. I drive 90% highway to and from work and it is a 27 mile one way drive. I expected better. I do drive 75ish mph. Would slowing down be that much better?
I do not have a lift and I have a tonnue cover on the bed. Your commute is almost exactly the same as mine and I keep it at 70 mph. I doubt that 5 mph is costing you 4-5 mpg so I would try some new plugs, check tire pressure, Toyota fuel injector cleaner etc. BTW, my mileage has dropped to 20 mpg during the winter due to oxygenated gas so if you get better mileage in the summer youre not doing that bad.
'04 Taco x-cab 3RZ FE stock (daily driver) '90 x-cab 22RE stock '82 Hilux 6" lift (ACES HI) '82 2-Hiluxs' Rally Edition (parts) '81 Hilux 3" lift (parts/restore)
|
|
|
|
|
|