|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: whitelespaul]
#804760
04/13/07 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 156
OP
Wheeler
|
|
Strangers have the best candy
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: Fleabag]
#804761
04/13/07 04:51 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,741
Body Damage is Cool
|
i have had my header on for over a year and so far has not leaked at all.and it did help power out,and with the tri-y i even gained some seat of the pants power down in the mid range.
87 dodge power ram 50,35" tires,5 1/2" total lift,4.6 gears,lockers front and rear,Rancho RS5000's,custom front bumper,custom rock sliders,cct extended diff breathers,75 amp alt(40 amp stock),thorely header,K&N,wheeled hard...
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: LRJ4x4]
#804762
04/13/07 04:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,413
Body Damage is Cool
|
Don't waste your money, as we all know there is only one way to get power out of a 2.6. I'll give you a hint it starts with a T
<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/patriot.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> The reading from LRG, taken from the gospel according to FastEddy...Amen.
87 Montero, bought new, by me - 88/89 intercooled Starion Turbo engine- with awesome audio.
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: dadrab]
#804763
04/14/07 12:29 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,211
Trail Leader
|
The Thorley IS a much higher quality piece, and there's no reason to ceramic coat it. It has a protective chrome finish (not a "show" finish). I've had mine for several years, but I wouldn't do it again - no real performance gain that I could tell. I always get asked what the thing attached to the header with a hose clamp is. It's the stove for the warm air tube that goes to the air cleaner. And I don't use Fram oil filters any more, either... John B.
'87 Raider 2.6 Turbo Auto, Under Construction '95 Montero SR, 35x12.5/15 BFG M/T KM-2's, Rock sliders, Qtr panel chop, gas tank lift, 2" BL, Aisins, 5.29s '95 Pajero Mini '98 Montero Winter Ed. '04 Cadillac XLR '03 Kawasaki ZRX1200R '60 Ford Falcon 4Dr
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: Fleabag]
#804764
04/16/07 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 220
Wheeler
|
DVEG DVES, dGEV, who knows? I know the last letter determines right versus left linkage.
83 mitsu flat bed 2.6l weber, 88 auto tranny, 2" body lift, 4.625 LSD, 235/85-16E mudders (33 x 9.50).
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: whitelespaul]
#804765
04/19/07 03:45 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104
Wheeler
|
would the pace or toury? be better to buy i need a new manifold cuz of the 02 popin out over 1500 rpm's do any of them have the plug for the 02?
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: blackmage]
#804766
04/22/07 04:44 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,211
Trail Leader
|
The Thorley has a bung for the O2 sensor at the collector end of the header.
John B.
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: JohnnyBfromPeoria]
#804767
04/22/07 07:55 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 479
Mudrunner
|
The stock cast iron manifold and factory head pipe makes a Tri-Y setup just like the thorly header, the only difference being the thorly would have smoother flow being mandrel bent pipe instead of a rough cast interior. Rockauto.com sells new cast manifolds for around the $140 mark. The fact that both are Tri-Y's may account for the fact that most people don't notice a difference when switching between them. Most foreign cars make more power per liter then the equivalent sized US made engine. It seems they aren't afraid to design in power building optimizations (such as Tri-Y exhausts) where US engines tend to just look at costs (a cast straight pipe with four flanges dumping to a single outlet and seemingly cast as thin as possible). Just a thought...
-Todd 1987 Montero 2.6l 5-speed (Sold...but I still miss her) 2008 Jeep Patriot Sport 4x4
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: toddstidham1]
#804768
04/23/07 08:06 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 104
Wheeler
|
so it don't really matter if i buy the tri y for good looks or get a cast iron one? which 02 thread would last longer and bad talk reviews on both?
i need too order one today so i can get emissons done or its time to sell it and fix my talon
|
|
Re: Pacesetter headers on the 2.6
[Re: blackmage]
#804769
04/23/07 09:00 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 227
Wheeler
|
my buddy has a d50, and had the stock manifold replaced with a pacesetter a couple years ago. according to mike, the pacesetter was a giant piece of crap, and he tossed it in favor of the thorley piece. The low end torque increases are noticeable, and seat of the pants feel in his truck is equal to the gain from the weber 38. if i keep the 2.6 i'm building for longer than the 6 months i plan to, i'll be buying a thorley header to complement my 38 as well.
just my 2.6 cents.
'09 Acura TSX Tech Package '05 Blazer (Company hauler) Retired '88 Bada$$ edition Raider (now owned by shadowgear)
|
|
|
|