|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: redbull]
#818980
08/29/07 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 401
Mudrunner
|
OK, brothers!
10,66 L/100 km is what it took from the very begining; 10,26 with new K&N air filter; 9,78 with new oil filter and Shell Rotella 10W40.
Using everyday with great pleasure Downtown - Metrotown and back.
Try to take out roof rack, you do not use it every day, right? Another thing makes me happy, every time smth like Blazer pass me by, I remind their price and GAS consumption 20 L/ 100 km.
Good luck,
Fight for Right to drive from Right! www.ivoac.caStay away from Nic's Garage at 120 West 1st Ave in Vancouver BC!!!
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: jfarsang]
#818981
08/29/07 01:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 7,309
Trail Leader
|
From what I've found, altitude makes the biggest diff. When I was in Van, Surrey, etc, I had zero smoke, and was doing better than 10 per 100. But back at 1100m... not as good. I'm gonna try monkeying with the pump a bit, to compensate for the thinner air. Nigel, I waxed my truck a few weeks ago at Jamboree - but I used branches. Worked great to scrape all that mud off. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/nana.gif" alt="" /> (facebook users should be able to view this) ![[Linked Image]](http://photos-165.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v120/249/16/579335165/n579335165_383540_944.jpg)
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: PHIL_]
#818982
08/29/07 07:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
Body Damage is Cool
|
yah I know altitude makes a huge difference, I am going to build hard pipes for my intake and intercooler pipes and try and make it breath alot better...that should help a pile...the accordian intake hose is pretty restrictive.
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: hazy_daze]
#818983
08/29/07 02:43 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 913
Rock Warrior
|
<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/barf.gif" alt="" />You guys aren't happy with 19-22 miles per gallon? (if I'm converting this right) I'd be ecstatic with those figures <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> Us petrol boys only see 15-18 MPG <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/baby.gif" alt="" /> My Gen II with the 3.0L gas V6 would get 19-20 on the highway and about 17-18 mixed driving. With diesel running about $.24 more than regular unleaded here in UT, doesn't seem worthwhile to get (or convert for us in the US) to diesel. Is it because the Gen II is so heavy that the mileage isn't better? I know the Jeep Liberty with the 2.8L CRD (only small SUV with diesel here) gets about 27-30 MPG (or 7.9-8.7 L/100 km) and it weighs about the same as a Gen II LWB.
Lee '94 LS, 3.0 V6, Auto, completely stock
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: Lee N]
#818984
08/29/07 06:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
Body Damage is Cool
|
I can't see how a Liberty weighs the same as a GEN II. its 1/2 the size. up here diesel is cheaper than gas. if I drive mine nice I can get about 25-28MPG in town, the highway doesn't usually change too much because its reving at 3500RPM doing 110km/h
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: torquemonster]
#818985
08/29/07 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 469
Mudrunner
|
I googled "Jeep Liberty curb weight" and got a base model curb weight of 3800-3900lbs for the V6 model, depending on transmission choice. Obviously not a lot of Titanium in a Liberty! LOL. We got a wayyy better deal, weight-wise.. a couple of hundred pounds more, and we get 7-seaters that can haul an assembled desk or a chest freezer no problem..
I am now officially a Pajero owner. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />. 1992 Exceed w/winter pkg, roof tray, bounceys, the works
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: Clead]
#818986
08/29/07 11:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
Body Damage is Cool
|
you can't really call our trucks 7-seaters though, nobody can fit in those back seats. but that isn't too impressive for dodge....I had no idea the liberty was such a land-yacht
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: torquemonster]
#818987
08/30/07 01:18 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 469
Mudrunner
|
Yeah, I'd consider seats 6 and 7 child or midget only.. LOL. I've got a rugrat <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/baby.gif" alt="" /> though, as do most of my friends, so the seats count as far as I'm concerned!
I am now officially a Pajero owner. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />. 1992 Exceed w/winter pkg, roof tray, bounceys, the works
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: Clead]
#818988
08/30/07 03:44 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 315
Mudrunner
|
trucks never get their EPA. I would like to see what the EPA is on a PAJERO.
1991 MITSUBISHI PAJERO EXCEED
|
|
Re: Post you Pajero pictures.
[Re: DonM]
#818989
08/30/07 03:55 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 401
Mudrunner
|
What is it? Sorry my <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/baby.gif" alt="" />
Fight for Right to drive from Right! www.ivoac.caStay away from Nic's Garage at 120 West 1st Ave in Vancouver BC!!!
|
|
|
|