|
|
|
|
Re: 6G72 engine block evolution and interchangability...
[Re: yankneck696]
#825147
08/27/07 02:32 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 59
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Howdy All,
To my question as to the 24V 1995 3000cc 6G72 and replacement blocks for a Montero Yankneck replied:
>Easy fix... >89> Sigma >90> Stealth >90> Galant >90> 3000 GT
>Basically, ANY Mitsu from 89 up will plug right in there >with oil pan, oil pump setup (with filter boss), harmonic >balancer, timing covers, intake, exhaust & all front >accessories. -------------------- >Yankneck = Yankee ingenuity with Redneck stupidity. >"How can I break it better?" >89 Raider 3.0 w/ 31's for now
This is wrong. All of the 12V engines (and I've taken apart 2 and looked at half a dozen) have different water bosses and pumps. The oil passages are different as are the water passages and damed it if I'm going to make a custom head gasket. You can't just use them as a long block for the gen 3 fuel injected engines. This may also reflect on the Diamante Vs. 6G72 thread.
Rayman.
Ray In the Pacific Wonderland 95 Montero 5 spd 87 Raider 2.6 5 spd 65 MG Midget 2002 Integra GSR (wife's car)
|
|
Re: 6G72 engine block evolution and interchangability...
[Re: Rayman]
#825148
08/27/07 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Mudrunner
|
Sorry... I guess I didn't see the 24V.
Ed
Yankneck = Yankee ingenuity with Redneck stupidity. "How can I break it better?" 89 Raider 3.0 w/ 31's for now
|
|
Re: 6G72 engine block evolution and interchangability...
[Re: sparkem]
#825149
08/27/07 02:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,607
Roll Me Over
|
I thought the 95SRs had the double overhead cams. That's what I thought <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" /> Was there ever a 24v 3.0L? I though ALL 3.0L Montero engines were 12V. 24V came with the DOHC 3.5L and then the SOHC 24V 3.5L that I have. Am I wrong? May be this is why you're having problems finding the right block. Do you heads have 2 valves per cylinder or 4?
'97 Montero 'LSR' - 4.6 gears & factory rear locker, 33" Procomp muds on 15x8 steelies, 50mm coil spacers, T-bar crank, Airlift, sans rear sway, 50mm rear frame & fuel tank lift, Aisins, ARB front bumper + 10k lb winch, 50mm DIY body lift, rock sliders, cut rear quarter panels...
|
|
Re: 6G72 engine block evolution and interchangability...
[Re: Mad_Scientist]
#825150
08/27/07 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,269
Roll Me Over
|
95 and 96 LS's had a 24V SOHC 3.0. Maybe he has an LS like he was saying. Never seen a 95 SR with a 3.0 but manuals are rare too so maybe he has the 3.0 24V.
99 Gen 2.5, fixing blown head gasket 89 SWB- 33's, ARB Front locker, SR rear locker/axle, SR F brakes, winch, WST Offroad Armor all Around, 2.85 Aussie T-case Gears (SOLD) Sold: (2) 95 SR's, 86 SWB, 90LWB, 91 LWB -Can Change a timing belt in my sleep..
|
|
Re: 6G72 engine block evolution and interchangability...
[Re: justice]
#825151
08/28/07 05:14 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 59
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
To clarify:
It is a 95 LS with a 6g72 24V (and yes I have 4 valves per cylinder) and a 5 speed manual. I't is a SOHC. I believe justice is correct in that they were only imported to the USA in 95' and 96' and 95' was the last year of the manual. However, I'm not sure if the later Montero Sport's had the same 3.0 engine. That was a 3.0 SOHC 24V as well to 1998 or later. I'm not sure. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/baby.gif" alt="" />
Ray In the Pacific Wonderland 95 Montero 5 spd 87 Raider 2.6 5 spd 65 MG Midget 2002 Integra GSR (wife's car)
|
|
|
|
|
|