Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: billygoat] #835379 09/15/07 06:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,511
ryany Offline
Body Damage is Cool
If you want to get really technical with the math, you have to calculate for the actual tire diameter, which changes as the tire wears. A 33" tire is rarely exactly 33", and won't remain at that size throughout it's life. For example, suppose a 33" tire has 15/32 tread when new. When it's worn to 3/32 of tread depth, it will have decreased to a 32 1/4" tire (12/32 worn x 2 sides = 3/4"). The Tire Rack website has all the technical data for every tire it sells including actual width & diameter measurements. It's interesting to look at how many 33" tires aren't really 33" diameter.


95 Montero SR
3.8 MIVEC, Advance headers, 2 1/2" exhaust, Magnaflow muffler, OME shocks & rear springs, 2" body lift, 3" tank lift, 4.90s, TRE front locker, factory rear locker, Roger Brown Rock Sliderz, 315/75r16 (35") tires, Sport big brakes
Brain Fart..... [Re: ryany] #835380 09/17/07 01:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 77
T
TripleJackInGA Offline
Getting the Wheeling Fever
After working myself into a frothy mess thinking about this, I've figured you guys are exactly right, and I was exactly opposite of actual on this one.
If you travel an indicated 1 mile in a truck with oversized tires, you have actually traveled further than 1 mile.

Sorry for the fuss, lol!


*************************************

TripleJack

85 GenI SWB 2.5/5-Speed on 33s

*************************************
Re: Brain Fart..... We all have them. [Re: TripleJackInGA] #835381 09/18/07 06:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,458
rxinhed Offline
Trail Leader
*****
TripleJack,

For the difference made by swapping from the stock size to 33" tires, my indicated mileage isn't affected that much. Depending on my project load and type, certain tire combos are better than others. I've just put the 33's back on because I'm close to home and working on a sandy fill for the new Folsom Bridge. When I was going to Tahoe everyday, 140 to 170 miles with highway only, lots of high speed downhill corners over the 6,000 foot differential between my office and the project site, it made more sense for the stock tires. I like stopping. Aside from the braking woes (:z:), I'd run the 33's all the time.

Russell


1987 Raider - Roxy
1988 Mighty Max 2.6L Turbo - Pearl
1997 Mountaineer V8 - Freddy
2000 Excursion V10 - Freya
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: TripleJackInGA] #835382 09/19/07 12:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,494
B
BobShaw Offline
Body Damage is Cool
I got 15.5 mph with my 2.6L and 31" muds. I now get 20.5mph with a 4.3L and 32" muds. You figure?


87 Raizer, 4.3V6, Mod TH700R4,231CHD, detroit rear and LSD front, bouncy seats, 2" lift and 32x15 BFG MT tires.
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: BobShaw] #835383 09/19/07 07:16 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,727
LRJ4x4 Offline
Web Wheeler
*****
I was told the 2.6 is a old diesel tractor motor design <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cyclops.gif" alt="" />


98 Montero with cold weather package
96 Toyota Land Cruiser, fully locked Mall Machine :-)
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: LRJ4x4] #835384 09/19/07 02:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,356
MontyMcV Offline
Trail Leader
I have also read Mitsu fork-lifts.


Big Truck: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 5-Spd drive line in hand!
Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top
Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 65k
Daughter's: 06 Eclipse, Keeping it Mitsu!
FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: MontyMcV] #835385 09/19/07 05:50 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 259
Baldy Offline
Mudrunner
I got 13 mpg with my 2.6 with 31" tires, 4.22 gears but I was never able to use 5th gear due to the gearing.
I get 17 mpg with the swapped in V8.

Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: Baldy] #835386 09/24/07 12:17 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 262
T
TresMon Offline OP
Mudrunner


Where's the best deal on a webber?


--Tres
(John 14:6)

Black 87' Raider
2.6L/Webber 88
5 Speed
Welded front,tight LSD in the rear
Removed bump stops
4'x6' roof rack
10k. Lb. winch on receiver hitch/custom bumper
100 amp alt
CB radio/AC inverter
S.Winch hubs
Enormous RV battery
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: TresMon] #835387 09/24/07 03:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 122
E
EyeOnCy Offline
Wheeler
http://www.racetep.com/montero.html
Go through this site and find the application. I ordered from them when they were offering freeshipping. I've seen like 2 Webers on ebay in my time of owning this, but they didn't have the adapter plates. Just order this, its not cheap, but you get EVERYTHING you need w/ easy to follow instructions. I've never worked on a car before and I installed it and tuned it.


1989 Dodge Raider 2.6L/5spd
2004 Honda Element EX
1989 Dodge Daytona Shelby Z
1993 Toyota P/U
Re: 2.6 Liter = 17.5 mpg!?!?!?!?!? [Re: EyeOnCy] #835388 09/24/07 08:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,356
MontyMcV Offline
Trail Leader
TEP and cheap prices generally do not get spoken in the same sentence...


Big Truck: 00, 3.5, Endeavor, 5-Spd drive line in hand!
Little Truck: 87, 2.6T I/C, MT, LSDs, Tonneau Top
Her Truck: 03, 3.8, 20th Anniv, 65k
Daughter's: 06 Eclipse, Keeping it Mitsu!
FSMs: MitsubishiLinks.com
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 16 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6422 MB (Peak: 0.7663 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-01 20:53:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS