|
|
Isuzu sued over trooper design
#842215
10/18/07 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 416
OP
Mudrunner
|
Heard about this today. First time I've heard what they were driving... Maimed Berthoud teens sue carmaker They say open doors hid flashers, contributing to crash By Arthur Kane The Denver Post Article Last Updated: 10/18/2007 12:42:35 AM MDT
Two Berthoud High School teens who lost their legs in a traffic accident this year are suing the maker of the vehicle they were riding in, saying it was defectively designed and helped contribute to the crash.
The lawsuit, filed in Denver District Court on Monday, claims that the back doors of the Isuzu Trooper, when opened to retrieve the spare tire and jack, obscure safety lights.
"The 1999 Trooper was improperly designed in such a manner that, when the right rear door is opened, the door obscures the right rear lights, reflectors and emergency hazard lights from the view of vehicles approaching from behind," the lawsuit states.
Tyler Carron and Nikko Landeros, both 17 at the time, lost their legs after the accident on the night of Jan. 15 when they were hit from behind by another student while changing a tire on the Trooper, police said.
The student, Michelle Berra, pleaded guilty to careless driving last month and received a deferred judgment that included public service and driving education.
The attorney representing the teens and their families said the Trooper's design violates a federal law that requires that safety lights be visible.
"It's a primary reason for the accident," attorney Mark Davis said. "Ms. Berra was not able to pick up that the vehicle was there. She didn't swerve or stop to avoid the accident, and the boys need to have the rear door open. It was a highly foreseeable circumstance."
Davis said that along with compensation for prosthetics and pain and suffering, the plaintiffs want Isuzu to notify other owners of the danger.
Isuzu officials declined to comment on the lawsuit. Davis said the car manufacturer's attorneys have told them this is the first complaint they have received alleging a design problem.
Attorneys for Berra had argued that she was unable to see the Trooper, that it was parked in the road and that bright lights shining from a truck behind her made it hard to see.
Davis said the case is likely to be moved to federal court and could take at least two years to resolve.
What the lawsuit says
Tyler Carron and Nikko Landeros were hit from behind while changing a tire on a 1999 Isuzu Trooper, similar to the vehicle of the same make and year pictured in this article. The suit says the SUV was improperly designed because the rear doors, when open, block the hazard lights.
--Dave
1999 Rodeo LS 3.2 4x4 5 Speed 32x11.50-15 BFG T/A KO on US Wheel 94 series 3" Lift - Rancho 9000x Rear No-Slip Locker Flowmaster 50 series SUV 2.25"
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." - Dave Barry
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Gizzy42]
#842216
10/18/07 04:52 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 201
Wheeler
|
I would throw this out of court just because of the faulty premise below. "The 1999 Trooper was improperly designed in such a manner that, when the right rear door is opened, the door obscures the right rear lights, reflectors and emergency hazard lights from the view of vehicles approaching from behind," the lawsuit states. unless there is a design difference in this one Trooper, the right rear door does not need to be opened to retrieve the exterior mounted spare or the jack / handle and lug wrench located inside the left rear storage area. Could it be that the operator of the vehicle unintentionally placed themselves at risk by not properly securing said spare tire and jack in the locations provided for this purpose by the vehicle manufacturer.
Bob
"You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you."
02 Trooper S, TOD, Aisin Hubs, FJORD Blue, ARB 3444070 Winch Bar. Dueler A/T REVO LT265/75R16
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Gizzy42]
#842217
10/18/07 06:25 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 576
Rock Warrior
|
Attorneys for Berra had argued that she was unable to see the Trooper, that it was parked in the road and that bright lights shining from a truck behind her made it hard to see. Having the vehicle in a lane of traffic is grounds for negligance on the trooper owners part. Or greedy people trying to leech off a corp. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" /> Jim
1979 Pontiac Trans-Am - looking 4 a pontiac 455cid 1988 Trooper II - AMC head, .030 overbore, Calmini cam. Toga HV oil pump, Aisins, soon 2 b turbo 1989 Impulse Turbo - Fidanza flywheel, 270cc injectors, turbo-back exhaust, KYBs F/R
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Gizzy42]
#842218
10/18/07 07:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,394
Isuzu Moderator
|
"It's a primary reason for the accident," attorney Mark Davis said. "Ms. Berra was not able to pick up that the vehicle was there. She didn't swerve or stop to avoid the accident, and the boys need to have the rear door open. It was a highly foreseeable circumstance." Hmmmm. So, either they stopped in the middle of the road to change the tire, or the girl was driving on the shoulder. Yet, the doors were the "primary reason" for the accident? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" /> Yep, it's always someone else's fault...
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: houlster]
#842219
10/18/07 10:08 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 777
Rock Warrior
|
Yep...another case of passing the blame. Seems to be a common practice in today's America.
I just like how the girl who ran into them is being charged with reckless driving, yet the 2 boys are looking towards Isuzu to pay for their prosthetics. I would think that insurance would cover that, and if not, how about going after the person who ran into you.
'97 Rodeo 3.2L V6 DOR 3" lift, 3"BL, DOR Boulder Bars, Tera-Low's, 33x10.5,Surco Safari Rack, Cobra CB, Rancho 9000's....andnNow with Half-Doors for the summer
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Jonesy]
#842220
10/18/07 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,652
Roll Me Over
|
Suing a high school girl--or her limits--is unlikely to yield a lot of money, even if you bankrupt her whole family.
Suing the insurance company of the girl--they're probably very well insulated.
Suing the truck driver who was behind her...might be hard to find him/her? of course it's not the high school girls fault, how could she have known to adjust her mirror when the lights from behind were blinding her?
Suing Isuzu is the quickest, easiest route to cash.
I echo the above comments on where the two boys were parked, or the girl was driving, on the road. Lots of questions, but I'd have to see more info before passing judgment, however.
[color:"white"]? 04 Rodeo DI ?[/color] 75k mi, body damage on the 1st weekend I got it.
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Gizzy42]
#842221
10/18/07 10:21 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,652
Roll Me Over
|
Google search yields much more detailed info, including this story from when it happened. The kids *might* have been drunk, were driving in violation of license (driver was a new teen driver at night), and they did stop in the middle of the road to change their tire. They saw the vehicle approaching and chose not to get out of the way. They also got a lot of sympathy and donations after it happened, presumably before any details came out. From the above linked story (Whole story is informative): Questions about the accident, which cost Tyler Carron and Nikko Landeros their legs, swirled around the case after attorneys for the teenager who crashed into them asserted in a court filing Friday that the boys were intoxicated when they stopped in the middle of a county road on Jan. 15 to change a tire.
The attorneys also alleged that the boys broke other laws that night - that Carron "unlawfully" drove with more than one passenger in his Isuzu Trooper, that he stopped in a traffic lane, and that he and Landeros stood in the roadway...... The tragic chain of events unfolded about a mile south of Berthoud at 11:40 p.m. on Jan. 15, according to the Colorado State Patrol's report. Carron was driving, and his passengers included Landeros and three girls - two 15-year-olds and a 16-year-old.
Carron was driving south on a snowy two-lane county road when he stopped to fix a flat tire. According to the accident report, Carron stopped in the middle of the southbound lane.
The two boys were standing behind the Isuzu, beginning work to change the tire, when Berra approached. She was driving the speed limit - 40 mph - and crashed into the back of the Isuzu, crushing the legs of the two boys, according to the report.
The story of the two boys as they worked to overcome their injuries, return to school and go on with their lives drew national attention.
In the meantime, Abrahamson's office filed two counts of careless driving causing bodily injury against Berra.
Berra told investigators that she never saw the car stopped in the road. According to the accident report, the investigating trooper concluded the area was "dark - unlighted" at the time of the crash.
In their court filing late Friday, Berra's attorneys served notice that they intend to pursue a defense that will attribute a portion of the blame for the accident to Carron and Landeros.
Attorneys Stephen Peters and John Chanin alleged that both boys were "unlawfully drinking and impaired by alcohol," that Carron had more than one passenger in his car, that he "unlawfully stopped his vehicle in the middle of a traffic lane," and that they both "unlawfully stood in the middle of a traffic lane at the rear of the vehicle, taking no evasive action when they saw the defendant's headlights approaching."
In addition, the attorneys said that the boys blocked the view of the Isuzu's taillights. And here's a picture of a 1999 Isuzu rear end (according to another story link). The tire does appear to obscure the one light....but was that one light really the cause if you're in the middle of the road?
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: Gizzy42]
#842222
10/18/07 11:58 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 898
Rock Warrior
|
While I don't think the Trooper is at fault, visibility during these types of situations is a concern. I've put reflective tape along the door edges of my doors, so they can easily been seen at night, for this very reason. ![[Linked Image]](http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p168/litnin/Website%20Pics/DSCN2770.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p168/litnin/Website%20Pics/DSCN2762.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p168/litnin/Website%20Pics/DSCN2768.jpg)
1995 Trooper LS auto 3.2 DOHC /w SOHC intake 1989 Trooper 2.6 auto 1989 I-Mark RS DOHC 1.6 1991 Stylus XS DOHC 1.8
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: litnin]
#842223
10/19/07 01:37 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 416
OP
Mudrunner
|
I like the reflective tape. I agree with the above comments. Maybe the lights had been obscured but it was by no means the major cause. The actions of the boys and the girl driving the other vehicle were all major factors in what happened. I also posted this on the planet. Here is the link if you want to check out the replies there as well. POST LINK
--Dave
1999 Rodeo LS 3.2 4x4 5 Speed 32x11.50-15 BFG T/A KO on US Wheel 94 series 3" Lift - Rancho 9000x Rear No-Slip Locker Flowmaster 50 series SUV 2.25"
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." - Dave Barry
|
|
Re: Isuzu sued over trooper design
[Re: litnin]
#842224
10/19/07 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,111
Body Damage is Cool
|
Nice idea on the reflective tape.
You will win the lawsuit for sure. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />
seriously though, I like the tape. Great idea.
when looking for a container to hold drained brake fluid, find a container that is different from the beverage you are currently consuming.
|
|
|
|