Quote
Quote
BTW.....That letter turned out to be questionable as far as authentication !


I assume you are referring to the Rush letter. Are you implying he kept the real one because everyone knows that the senate really did write one. Harry Reid even mentioned it on the senate floor the last day of bidding. How would you authenticate something like that? If they can prove that it is indeed senate stationary what would they have to prove next, maybe verify the signers?

Carlos



I was implying that it certainly would be very difficult to ascertain or not if that letter was really legitimate.

It seems to have us constituants and tax payers wondering the issue of honesty and credibility regarding the letter.


And if it was legit. then why the fake letter to begin with?



Maybe I'm just wondering it's issue of being authentic?


SO, was the second letter just for presentation?

Not saying that I am sure or anything.

Was it for security reasons?

...Is that why?


Just wondering?



Is Rush Limbo Lying to us again?



Wish I possesed all the facts here!............. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />



Thanks.

----
<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/patriot.gif" alt="" />