Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: PHIL_] #855976 12/30/07 09:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
torquemonster Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Quote
Mitsu G54B 2.6 gas engine is prone to head cracking, gaskets, etc. Trust me, I had one. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />

4D56 diesel is a different beast.


the 2.6 is a VERY good engine aswell...it is very prone to cracking heads but you just have to treat it right. I miss my old G54B. I had that engine running just perfect when I sold it.

I overheated my pajero pretty bad in the summer and as far as I know I didn't crack the head, or if I did it isn't bad enough to burn any coolant yet(knock on wood). Mitsubishi diesel engines are very tough, and the 4D engine has been around for YEARS and YEARS.

even that old G54B 2.6 engine used to be a diesel engine, that bottom end is indestructible

Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: torquemonster] #855977 12/30/07 03:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 200
Glock24 Offline
Wheeler
Quote
I overheated my pajero pretty bad in the summer and as far as I know I didn't crack the head, or if I did it isn't bad enough to burn any coolant yet(knock on wood).


I overheated mine pretty bad too long ago, was on a trip and when rad hose blew. No cracked head for AFAIK.

Quote
Mitsubishi diesel engines are very tough, and the 4D engine has been around for YEARS and YEARS.


Very true. There are many mid 80s Gen I Diesels around here still running, and the driving conditions here are not friendly to vehicles. A friend of mine has a '86 or '87 Montero, it is not running any more but the engine is the only thins that still works <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


'98 Galloper II Exceed 2.5TDI LWB 5sp Manual 5.29 Diffs
Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: vlad4d56] #855978 12/30/07 07:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 82
B
BigHornE Offline OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
Quote
Big tires look great, but why you need them on highway? The truck will take much more fuel.


The tires on my Landcruiser are almost new; it would be a waste to sell them with the truck. Plus, the Pajero I'm looking at will need new rubber soon...

Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: BigHornE] #855979 12/31/07 03:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
torquemonster Offline
Body Damage is Cool
larger tires on the highway give you better gas mileage...engine is revving lower. it will give worse mileage in town with all the stops and starts.

Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: torquemonster] #855980 12/31/07 03:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 372
spence121 Offline
Mudrunner
Quote
larger tires on the highway give you better gas mileage...engine is revving lower. it will give worse mileage in town with all the stops and starts.


Then what the hell am I doing wrong. I drive 70km one way to work and most of that is all highway. I was getting 700km on about 83 liters of fuel but have dropped to about 560 km on 90 liters. Bigger tires (285/75 r16 vs 256/70 R15) and have had the wheel alignment done. Seems to be sucking way less in town and I now drive about 95km/hr on the speedo vs 105 with the smaller tires??? I put the bigger ones on for better economy which was going against everything I was ever tought or believed in <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


"WE ARE ALL A PRODUCT OF OUR OWN DECISIONS"

92 Mitsubishi Pajero XR 2.5 TD (SOLD and feeling lost without it)
OME Suspension
American Racing steel Wheels with
Dick Cepek FCII Tires
Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: BigHornE] #855981 12/31/07 03:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 108
T
tengopajero Offline
Wheeler
I bought my 91 SWB at VIB Motors in rthe Vancouver area for $10.9K - loaded with tons of toys and including 4 brand new 31.5 tires -only had 66K km. and checked out as perfect by a mechanic buddy of mine. They were good to deal with and quite helpful with the paperwork for registering it in Ontario. While I guess I could have saved money by importing it myself & doing the paperwork, certification and shipping arrangements - to me the extra cost was worth it & there's no substitute for actually test driving the vehicle and not having to worry about whether what you bought will actually turn out to be what you thought you were getting.

FWIW

Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: spence121] #855982 12/31/07 04:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 316
B
bae146 Offline
Mudrunner
Have you factored in the odometer error from putting the larger tires on? You are probably reading 10 percent less kms than you are actually driving. So if your odometer reads 700 kms you actually drove 770 kms.

Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: bae146] #855983 12/31/07 05:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 186
S
Spinalguy Offline
Wheeler
The 10% rule is your friend <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />
i get 100-150kms more per tank on 33's than on 30's.


Get on the 'RIGHT' side of Health.
Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: Spinalguy] #855984 12/31/07 07:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,412
redbull Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Winter diesel is out now, and you will get less MPG out of that as well. I certainly did over my 2200km holiday tour of the homeland.


1991 Mitsubishi Pajero XP TD LWB family hauler.
Re: Pajero 2.5 - failure prone? [Re: redbull] #855985 01/01/08 12:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,538
torquemonster Offline
Body Damage is Cool
yea...and winter diesel this year SUCKS as opposed to any previous year. I am still getting 550km to 80L of fuel with my 33"s and my heavy @ss roof rack and a whole lot of donuts and bagging haha.

I wish I knew why your truck is getting such bad mileage, try switching conditioners...try the Redline stuff and see if that makes a difference. I know if I don't run any it makes a HUGE difference, my truck runs like a bag of $hit with nothing in the fuel

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.007s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.6426 MB (Peak: 0.7518 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-05-29 22:28:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS