|
|
|
|
Re: Info. on 91 4x4 P/U
[Re: monte3]
#878939
04/04/08 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 281
Mudrunner
|
I had the 2x4 version and it was sturdy beast. Not over powered mind you, but it was able to keep ticking. The weak point on my '89 was the head which I had to have rebuilt three times. Another weak point was the frame. The rear rusted out like I had dipped it in acid. Respectable mileage? That depends on the brain/foot connection. I got 27 mpg on flat highway, but I'm the grandpa guy tooling along at five mph above the speed limit while everyone else rockets past me. It's real easy to maintain for the average mechanic. Carbon tends to build up in the throttle chamber and associated ports and the brake slide pintals on mine tended to seize causing the brakes to bind. Annual greasing stops that. I though it was a great little truck. Very reliable.
'89 P'up, 2.6 I-Tec, 488,000 miles and done... gone to the great beyond
|
|
|
|
|
|
OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 3.747s Queries: 16 (3.745s) Memory: 0.5971 MB (Peak: 0.6301 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-05 14:26:21 UTCValid HTML 5 and Valid CSS