|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: el_d_m]
#886506
05/20/08 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 692
Rock Warrior
|
Hey el_d_m, just purely out of curiosity, not that I am saying you are wrong, but do you have actual numbers that back up your increased fuel economy?
I would honestly like to try an experiment with normal daily driving for about 5 tanks each configuration, to see if there is any difference with the K&N vs a good paper filter, with and with out throttle body spacers, cold air intakes, etc, but I sure donÆt want to foot the bill for all those parts, especially when to me they make no logical sense for any of my rigs.
Actually to any of you out there that would be interested, this could be interesting, we as a group could play a myth busters type roll and see if we can prove or disprove a lot of the gimmick type ôbolt onö performance hop up parts out there. I donÆt know, maybe itÆs just the engineer in me, but a lot of these things like the throttle body spacer just make no rational sense to me. If you take the part back to its roots (a carb spacer) it makes perfect sense. Raise the carb an inch or 2 to straighten out the airflow into a more laminar flow, and keep the carb cooler, and ultimately the fuel cool allowing a denser mixture to enter the cylinders. With most of the EFI engines the throttle body is a decent distance away from the intake, granted on our jeeps it is not, but most of the spacers advertise they swirl the air for better mixture, which doesnÆt make sense if they were trying to straighten out the air in a carbureted engine. That mixed with the fact that the fuel rail is right above the intake valve, and there is no fuel back at the throttle body to mix with the swirling air or to keep cool. Anyway, I am definitely off on a tangent from where this thread started now, sorry about that, just some random thoughts after work I guess, but I digress. It would be an interesting experiment to have though.
Sean
99 XJ Sport 2 Door, 4.0L, 5 speed, all stock. Daily Driver 79 F150 Standard Cab Short Box, 400ci, NP435, NP205, 35" SSRs
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: Bigbird79]
#886507
05/21/08 12:51 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,768
Web Wheeler
|
Hey el_d_m, just purely out of curiosity, not that I am saying you are wrong, but do you have actual numbers that back up your increased fuel economy?
I would honestly like to try an experiment with normal daily driving for about 5 tanks each configuration, to see if there is any difference with the K&N vs a good paper filter, with and with out throttle body spacers, cold air intakes, etc, but I sure donÆt want to foot the bill for all those parts, especially when to me they make no logical sense for any of my rigs.
Actually to any of you out there that would be interested, this could be interesting, we as a group could play a myth busters type roll and see if we can prove or disprove a lot of the gimmick type ôbolt onö performance hop up parts out there. I donÆt know, maybe itÆs just the engineer in me, but a lot of these things like the throttle body spacer just make no rational sense to me. If you take the part back to its roots (a carb spacer) it makes perfect sense. Raise the carb an inch or 2 to straighten out the airflow into a more laminar flow, and keep the carb cooler, and ultimately the fuel cool allowing a denser mixture to enter the cylinders. With most of the EFI engines the throttle body is a decent distance away from the intake, granted on our jeeps it is not, but most of the spacers advertise they swirl the air for better mixture, which doesnÆt make sense if they were trying to straighten out the air in a carbureted engine. That mixed with the fact that the fuel rail is right above the intake valve, and there is no fuel back at the throttle body to mix with the swirling air or to keep cool. Anyway, I am definitely off on a tangent from where this thread started now, sorry about that, just some random thoughts after work I guess, but I digress. It would be an interesting experiment to have though. Sean Sean I have the cajones to go ahead and SAY what is on my mind.. If a spacer would help responce, milage or horsepower the experienced engineers at MOPAR could have added one for 60 cents a vehicle!! If a K&N filter would help ANYTHING in the way of intake velocity those SAME engineers would have put one in the intake system. AND isn't the intake system already a "cold air" system? I am constantly amazed by the number of folks that think they can spend 40 or 50 bucks amd make their computerized engine do things the factory engineers couldn't make it do.. Big Jim <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />
professional bovine relocation specialist
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: Bigbird79]
#886508
05/21/08 01:19 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 131
Wheeler
|
i didnt mean to make it sound like i got huge gains LOL. i get excited over a little gain or improvement like..1/2 mpg is hot to me. in hindsight the spacer was added at the same time i added the k&n & the fitch system. so i cant say exactly which one or combo of any makes a difference. however i have been trying adding acetone to my gasoline ( 2oz per 10gallons) that seems to have made a difference on economy. its close to 1 1/2 or so it isnt exact . but anything helps.
93 xj stroked 4.2 w/4.0 head avenger supercharged 6.5" long arm 35" buckshots rubicon 44's front & rear
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: BigJim]
#886509
05/21/08 01:46 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 692
Rock Warrior
|
Hey el_d_m, just purely out of curiosity, not that I am saying you are wrong, but do you have actual numbers that back up your increased fuel economy?
I would honestly like to try an experiment with normal daily driving for about 5 tanks each configuration, to see if there is any difference with the K&N vs a good paper filter, with and with out throttle body spacers, cold air intakes, etc, but I sure donÆt want to foot the bill for all those parts, especially when to me they make no logical sense for any of my rigs.
Actually to any of you out there that would be interested, this could be interesting, we as a group could play a myth busters type roll and see if we can prove or disprove a lot of the gimmick type ôbolt onö performance hop up parts out there. I donÆt know, maybe itÆs just the engineer in me, but a lot of these things like the throttle body spacer just make no rational sense to me. If you take the part back to its roots (a carb spacer) it makes perfect sense. Raise the carb an inch or 2 to straighten out the airflow into a more laminar flow, and keep the carb cooler, and ultimately the fuel cool allowing a denser mixture to enter the cylinders. With most of the EFI engines the throttle body is a decent distance away from the intake, granted on our jeeps it is not, but most of the spacers advertise they swirl the air for better mixture, which doesnÆt make sense if they were trying to straighten out the air in a carbureted engine. That mixed with the fact that the fuel rail is right above the intake valve, and there is no fuel back at the throttle body to mix with the swirling air or to keep cool. Anyway, I am definitely off on a tangent from where this thread started now, sorry about that, just some random thoughts after work I guess, but I digress. It would be an interesting experiment to have though. Sean Sean I have the cajones to go ahead and SAY what is on my mind.. If a spacer would help responce, milage or horsepower the experienced engineers at MOPAR could have added one for 60 cents a vehicle!! If a K&N filter would help ANYTHING in the way of intake velocity those SAME engineers would have put one in the intake system. AND isn't the intake system already a "cold air" system? I am constantly amazed by the number of folks that think they can spend 40 or 50 bucks amd make their computerized engine do things the factory engineers couldn't make it do.. Big Jim <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" /> Jim, that was exactly my point. I think they are all gimmicks, and it would be nice to see an independent study performed to prove this to most of the general public, that buy into all this garbage once and for all. Sean
99 XJ Sport 2 Door, 4.0L, 5 speed, all stock. Daily Driver 79 F150 Standard Cab Short Box, 400ci, NP435, NP205, 35" SSRs
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: el_d_m]
#886510
05/21/08 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 692
Rock Warrior
|
you could try what I have been trying for the last 2 tanks. Slowing down about 5 MPH on average, shifting sooner, and keeping RPM's below 2200 for the most part. I normally average about 20.5 - 20.8 MPG, with a combination of highway and city driving. The last tank I got 22.2 MPG, this tank I got 23.03 MPG. I am going to continue this for the next few tanks to get a good average.
Sean
99 XJ Sport 2 Door, 4.0L, 5 speed, all stock. Daily Driver 79 F150 Standard Cab Short Box, 400ci, NP435, NP205, 35" SSRs
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: Bigbird79]
#886511
05/21/08 05:35 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
I want to post some pics of my new rig. How do I do that on this site? As far as fuel economy goes, I took the roof offroad lights off as well as the factory roof rack...lotta drag up there. I drive like a granny so I'll squeeze all the gas mileage I can out of the thing. I got a receiver hitch storage platform for stuff so nothing goes on the roof right now (just camping stuff). I want to do a rear tire carrier next so I can carry a full size spare and keep it out of the cargo area. Thanks for all the info and keep it coming.
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: 67shagster]
#886512
05/21/08 05:57 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,768
Web Wheeler
|
You go to a free site like PHOTOBUCKET.COM and you put your photos in there.. Then when you post here you load the URL of the photos from THAT site when asked by the posting.. It is hard to do the first time or two but gets easy after that. Big JIm <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/pfft.gif" alt="" />
professional bovine relocation specialist
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: 67shagster]
#886513
05/22/08 12:09 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 147
Wheeler
|
I want to do a rear tire carrier next so I can carry a full size spare and keep it out of the cargo area.
I hear ya with that. Carrying a 33" tire laying in the rear gives no room for cargo. and i really don't like the way it looks on the roof. I'm going to check out a wrecking yard sometime soon, and look for a swing away tire carrier from another vehicle, that I can modify to my liking.
Your road to glory will be rocky, but fulfilling. - Panda Express fortune cookie
94 YJ. no lift...YET
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: BigJim]
#886514
05/22/08 07:13 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
OP
Getting the Wheeling Fever
|
Thanks for the info on the pic stuff. Having a little trouble with it right now....maybe it's because I have a Mac operating sys?? Gonna do a tune-up. What brand of cap/rotor;plugs and wires are recommended? Plugs--i used to use NGK's on Toyota 22RE. Right now it has Autolite Platinums.
|
|
Re: Bought a Cherokee--Now What?
[Re: 67shagster]
#886515
05/22/08 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 692
Rock Warrior
|
CanÆt help you with the pics, I have never posted one on here. For my tune ups I go to Napa and buy their Napa Gold parts if I have a choice. For plugs I have been running the basic Bosch Platinums.
Sean
99 XJ Sport 2 Door, 4.0L, 5 speed, all stock. Daily Driver 79 F150 Standard Cab Short Box, 400ci, NP435, NP205, 35" SSRs
|
|
|
|