The pass was in the windshield according to a later post and a picture to go with it. It just wasn't hung from the mirror.
So, don't you wonder why THAT wasn't also stated in the first post? If he was concerned about advertising where he lived when not in the parking lot, it wouldn't matter whether it was on the dash or hanging from the mirror.
Also, wouldn't you wonder about when the picture was taken?
Then they should have apologized and reversed the whole thing. It wouldn't have been an issue at that point.
If it was the HOA doing the citing, I agree.... but once they contract with an outside firm, there is a bill to pay for services rendered - which could be changed depending on the relationship with the contractor and how agreeable they wanted to be. I doubt if many booting companies are very agreeable and once the HOA signs the deal with the Devil, there's Hell to pay. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
The contract also said they were to disable the vehicle by hooting, not booting.
Now that right there would get him off in my courtroom. If I was the judge, I would tell the contractor that if they couldn't read what THEY signed, then they should keep on hooting and see if they could disable the vehicle. If not, they should leave it alone and not mess with it. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> ....unless there were other references to "booting" in more authoritative clauses within the document.
Typos have no place (or excuse) in legal documents.... particularly when they describe agreed action.
Frank
