Quote
I don't know - go look for them and do your own research and explain what happened.


Exactly. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/kewl.gif" alt="" /> I have looked for them and I'm coming up short. If you ever find one yourself let me know <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Quote
If you understood the Purdue engineering data, you would recognize that much of the weight is in liquid form - and much of the metal structure of the plane itself disintegrates at high-speed contact with a reinforced structure...... anyway, I can't get you to accept reasonable explanations, so I won't try.


No, you can't provide a reasonable explanation - so I don't blame you for not trying. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> The empty wt of a 757 is around 57-65 tons. The max fuel cap of a 757 is around 6 tons. For a 757 to fit the evidence of the scene (i guess for some) we have to erroneously assume that indeed, "that much of the weight is in liquid form". (and also remove engines, reinforce uber material tail section that cuts through a building that shows no evidence of a tail section striking it...)

concreteprinter.com