Extreme Terrain
4x4Wire Trail Talk Forums: Jeep, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Pajero, Isuzu, Kia, 4WD, 4x4, SUV, Off-Road and OutdoorWire Forums


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 20 of 42 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 41 42
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: stony-man] #909671 01/06/09 06:46 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,649
Grasscat Offline
Roll Me Over
****
I hear you Stony, but I've never seen it. I'll search farther back, maybe I can learn something from his post.

I've had enough of this post, lets agree to disagree Phil. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />


Michael j

TreadLightly! Trainer

Grasscat III, 1994 Gen 2 Five speed, Stock ( for a little while )

GrassCat II, 1998 Gen 2.5 Locked and loaded. Ran off with Hector.

GrassCat I, 1991 Gen 1 Ran off with Justice.
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: bretwalda] #909672 01/06/09 12:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
FrankR Offline
Web Wheeler
****
I couldn't help but notice that you had no response to the musings about a political party organized and funded through 9-11 Truther schemes. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

The deeper into this stuff I peer, the funnier it gets:

Quote
On September 11, 2006, Democracy Now! broadcast a discussion between the Loose Change creators and editors from Popular Mechanics, where they debated various aspects of the documentary.[20] Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone has written that the "9/11 truth movement": "gives supporters of Bush an excuse to dismiss critics of this administration. I have no doubt that every time one of those Loose Change dickwads opens his mouth, a Republican somewhere picks up five votes."[38]

Chris Farrell, the Director of Investigations & Research at Judicial Watch, warned in an interview that his organization "could be the water carriers for a honey pot operation, in which the government attracts overwhelming attention to the Pentagon issue, making it the cornerstone of the "9/11 truth movement", and then blowing it out of the water by releasing clear footage of Flight 77."[54] He stated, "Let's just call it a baited trap, it draws somebody into a situation in which they're compromised."

According to George Monbiot, "The film's greatest flaw is this: the men who made it are still alive. If the US government is running an all-knowing, all-encompassing conspiracy, why did it not snuff them out long ago? There is only one possible explanation. They are in fact agents of the Bush regime, employed to distract people from its real abuses of power. This, if you are inclined to believe such stories, is surely a more plausible theory than the one proposed in Loose Change."[55]


Loose Change

Frank <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />


'89 [color:"white"]G-Raider[color:"white"] [color:"black"]Supercharged 3.0L, MegaSquirt 2, lockup A/T, 2.5" exhaust, 172k, Cibie H4s/Oscar SCs, Hella Micro DE fogs, Cobra CB, Superwinch hubs, LSD rear/Aussie Locker front, Bilsteins, Lifeline AGM, Rust-Oleum
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: FrankR] #909673 01/07/09 07:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,634
bretwalda Offline OP
Roll Me Over
Thanks Stony. Never thought I'd need to vindicated on a forum I've been a member of for 6+ yrs. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> Nonetheless I don't have much to say for the mighy Mitsu that I haven't already contributed. I don't have much to ask either - my beast is running fine and in its final state

...well that's not true. Smacks booster in the works - Based on the current level of skepticism concerning reality I'm sure I'll get 'smack' conspiracy claims that I'm in doing it to 'disrupt society', start a political party, or somehow deviously make money off an open source, howbeit completely bogus, design <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> ...But I'll be sure to post my results to maintain my worthiness of this board's membership. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Agree to disagree is fine Grasscat - but I hope somewhere down the road when things are much further down the crapper that my attempt to plant a seed of doubt regarding the largely fictitious left/right paradigm and all the misappropriated allegiance and support of neo-fascist, socialistic, imperialistic policies that goes with it will strike some chord of remembrance. Then its worth all the flaming (and it certainly isn't just here) I'm bound to receive:

ôWhenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government;à whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights.ö

-Thomas Jefferson

Quote
I couldn't help but notice that you had no response to the musings about a political party organized and funded through 9-11 Truther schemes.


Sigh...

I couldn't help but notice you had no response for the testimony of witnesses closest to a plane that we are told - hit the light poles, the building, and incinerated everything except the victims
...nor the diametrically opposing data of the FAA vs. the NTSB flight paths
...nor the fact the FDR put the plane at 400 ft above the Pentagon at the impact point
...nor the testimony of FAA director Norman Mineta
...nor the testimony of April Gallup, who walked out of the impact hole with her son
...nor the fact that Hanjour couldn't even check out in a 172 for lack of piloting skills
...nor the testimony of Barry Jennings
...nor the testimony of Scott Forbes
...nor the fact that the administration directly changed the EPA statement regarding ground zero air quality to one of no cause for concern - lies which have mortally affected the health and life of 50,000 rescue and cleanup workers
...nor the fact that half of the victims families believe 9-11 was an inside job
...nor the laughable contradictions of the NIST's report regarding the fires which miraculously caused only the third collapse of a steel framed skyscraper in history - the first two being WTC 1&2.
...nor the fact that shoot down orders were changed 4 months prior to the event and rescinded afterwards
...nor why the 'science' of the FL 77's crash is depicted sans two 6 ton engines and a tail fin that enters a building intact.
...nor a simple rational reason why citizens of the United States are forbidden from seeing the visual evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon from over 85 surveillance tapes CONFISCATED.

Get back to me on those and I'll be happy to waste my time with this 'musing'. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/sleeping.gif" alt="" />

The deeper into this stuff I peer, the funnier it gets:

Pop Mechanics 'factchecker' doofus ...s on the Charles Goyette show - MP3 file


concreteprinter.com
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: bretwalda] #909674 01/07/09 12:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
FrankR Offline
Web Wheeler
****
Quote
I hope somewhere down the road when things are much further down the crapper that my attempt to plant a seed of doubt regarding the largely fictitious left/right paradigm and all the misappropriated allegiance and support of neo-fascist, socialistic, imperialistic policies that goes with it will strike some chord of remembrance. Then its worth all the flaming (and it certainly isn't just here) I'm bound to receive:


I suppose that right there is the heart of the 9-11 Truther rationale for acceptance, belief and spreading of a lie when the truth makes more sense.

As for your questions:

1) "...you had no response for the testimony of witnesses closest to a plane that we are told - hit the light poles, the building, and incinerated everything except the victims."

Everything wasn't incinerated, despite mis-statements of witnesses and/or Truthers. Plenty of plane parts and some charred remains of passengers remained - of course, those plane parts don't fit the Truther's version of events.

2) & 3)... "...nor the diametrically opposing data of the FAA vs. the NTSB flight paths
...nor the fact the FDR put the plane at 400 ft above the Pentagon at the impact point"

If you've ever used radar, you'll understand ground clutter, echo, ghosts.... and many other anomalies that exist within the application of the science:

Quote
Clutter may also originate from multipath echoes from valid targets due to ground reflection, atmospheric ducting or ionospheric reflection/refraction. This specific clutter type is especially bothersome, since it appears to move and behave like other normal (point) targets of interest, thereby creating a ghost. In a typical scenario, an aircraft echo is multipath-reflected from the ground below, appearing to the receiver as an identical target below the correct one. The radar may try to unify the targets, reporting the target at an incorrect height, or - worse - eliminating it on the basis of jitter or a physical impossibility. These problems can be overcome by incorporating a ground map of the radar's surroundings and eliminating all echoes which appear to originate below ground or above a certain height. In newer Air Traffic Control (ATC) radar equipment, algorithms are used to identify the false targets by comparing the current pulse returns, to those adjacent, as well as calculating return improbabilities due to calculated height, distance, and radar timing.


Radar

The rest of your questions are irrelevant..... and a feeble attempt by Truthers to say "Just look at this and ignore the man behind the curtain."

The government murdered the passengers and then returned their personal effects to their next-of-kin? <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/scared.gif" alt="" /> I'll need to see some proof of that preposterous tale.

What happened to the plane?

Frank

Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: FrankR] #909675 01/07/09 02:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,479
StockRaider Offline
Roll Me Over
***
I have only 1 thing to say on this subject. How would you expect people to pull off such a massive plan like that and expect it wouldnt leak out? I mean we couldn't keep torture a secret in Guantanamo Bay. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />


Richard E
1989 Montero - Stock-ish
1989 V6 Auto Raider - 5.3 Vortech Swap.
1987 Mitsubishi Starion 2.6t, soon to be 3.5
1983 Honda XL600R
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: StockRaider] #909676 01/07/09 05:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Brown81CJ5 Offline
Body Damage is Cool
Quote
I have only 1 thing to say on this subject. How would you expect people to pull off such a massive plan like that and expect it wouldnt leak out? I mean we couldn't keep torture a secret in Guantanamo Bay. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />


I agree with this one...and am on Frank's side about this one....

If indeed (I highly doubt it) the govt. did pull off what you are trying to say Bretwalda...then we are all truly in danger...not just us US citizens, but the entire human species; and the govt. is more evil and disgusting than anyone can ever imagine.


Gun it and run it!
1981 CJ5,258,T-176,D300,AMC 20,Dana 30,Trxus M/T 31x10.50, Rancho 5000's, GroundPounderFab front bumper, polyethylene gas tank, aluminum dash, AutoMeter gauges

What this country needs is unemployed politicians.
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: bretwalda] #909677 01/07/09 06:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,649
Grasscat Offline
Roll Me Over
****
Quote
plant a seed


Never going to happen, your farming skills are lacking.

Quote
(and it certainly isn't just here)


That ought to tell you something right there. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />


Michael j

TreadLightly! Trainer

Grasscat III, 1994 Gen 2 Five speed, Stock ( for a little while )

GrassCat II, 1998 Gen 2.5 Locked and loaded. Ran off with Hector.

GrassCat I, 1991 Gen 1 Ran off with Justice.
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: FrankR] #909678 01/08/09 12:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,634
bretwalda Offline OP
Roll Me Over
Quote
Everything wasn't incinerated, despite mis-statements of witnesses and/or Truthers. Plenty of plane parts and some charred remains of passengers remained - of course, those plane parts don't fit the Truther's version of events.


Of course, those parts don't fit a 757 version of an airplane either <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />...unless you and Pop Mechanics have seen things the rest of us are allowed to see. Post some pics of these parts for us Frank. Lets see the obvious proof that a 757 hit the building. There's plenty of pics out there - you pick - show us the proof.

...But here again you sidestep. I'm talking about 13 independently interviewed witnesses that unanimously describe the exact same flight path that the FAA affirms. Each one even draws his perspective of the flight path on an arial map. They were not Truthers, they couldn't have unanimously misstated the same thing. So the coincidence theorists resort to an accusation of 'lies'. Remember, the government doesn't lie - only those that question the government. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/patriot.gif" alt="" />

Of course the FAA account is a huge problem for establishment apologists - because there is no way then that the light poles could have been knocked down - which begs the question, if it didn't - then what did? So now all of a sudden government data is selectively unreliable. We must find a means of obfuscating for this revelation. Aha! Radar data is bunk!

So lets take a look. When we look at the data and communications regarding this animation of the plane flying in north of the Citgo we find that this data is compiled from no less than four separate Radar TERMINAL APPROACH CONTROLS. These systems triangulate through multiple radars as well as transpond data between the aircraft and radars. Why? Because the system has to be accurate. Why? Because it is the key feature for regulating inbound aircraft and blending new incoming flights into the approach pattern. Not only that, but the closer to these radar systems, the more accurate the calculations. The Pentagon is about 3000ft from Reagan International Airport. Sorry Frank - "clutter" doesn't cut it. The evidence and eyewitness testimony affirms the huge holes in the official story.

Of course you can't even touch the NTSB data - because it is irrefutable - THE FLIGHT DATA RECORDER information puts the plane at 400 ft above the Pentagon at its impact point. This isn't 'radar clutter'. Its gathered from onboard systems including altimeter.

Quote
The rest of your questions are irrelevant..... and a feeble attempt by Truthers to say "Just look at this and ignore the man behind the curtain."


Well of course they're irrelevant - you've made up your mind. Bin Laden did it! We'll get into Tim Osman aka OBL shortly <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Quote
How would you expect people to pull off such a massive plan like that and expect it wouldnt leak out?


As I've said before - they didn't pull it off. We wouldn't be arguing about it if they did. And it did leak out - extensively.

Look into these people:
Indira Singh
Coleen Rowley,Division Counsel; FBI
House Rep (R) Curt Weldon and Able Danger
Sibel Edmonds, Language Specialist; FBI - recent documentary
John O Neil in conjunction with Jerry Hauer
Federal air marshal Bogdan Dzakovic
John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI
John Vincent, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI
Robert Wright, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI
Behrooz Sarshar, Language Specialist; FBI
Mike German, Special Agent, Counterterrorism; FBI
Gilbert Graham, Special Agent, Counterintelligence; FBI
Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Shaffer, DIA - responsible for Able Danger
Dick Stoltz, Special Agent; ATF
Randy Glass, funny how criminal informants are selectively dismissed or lauded depending on the agenda.

These are just some of more high profile figures. All of them (with the exception of O'Neil who coincidentally died in the towers) gave advanced warning regarding activities and/or people relating to the 9-11 plot. All of them turned away by their own agencies. All of their testimony either refused or redacted by the 9-11 Commission. And we aren't even scratching the surface. Mounds of leaked information, mounds of testimony by those on the inside who refuse to disclose their identity, etc.

Nonetheless, you're rationalizing that a trillion dollar megaplex of personnel, technology, and information available to those at the top with stated plans for a military and geopolitical revolution couldn't possibly pull off 9-11, couldn't conceive of it (see the Operation Northwoods documents)...and yet 19 guys and a kingpin hiding out out in a cave with a dialysis machine did - cuz they 'hate our freedums. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/drunk.gif" alt="" />


concreteprinter.com
Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: bretwalda] #909679 01/08/09 12:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,238
FrankR Offline
Web Wheeler
****
Quote
Aha! Radar data is bunk!


Yes, Phil.... sometimes it is. You should operate one sometime - you might see just how reliable it can (or can't) be. <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> I'm sure my years of experience with it is of no consequence.

Quote
FAA and NORAD response
NEADS was informed about American Airlines Flight 77 at 9:34 a.m., four minutes before it crashed into the Pentagon.

American 77 began deviating from its flight plan at 8:54, with a slight turn toward the south. Two minutes later, it disappeared completely from radar at Indianapolis Center, which was controlling the flight.

The controller tracking American 77 told us he noticed the aircraft turning to the southwest, and then saw the data disappear. The controller looked for primary radar returns. He searched along the plane's projected flight path and the airspace to the southwest where it had started to turn. No primary targets appeared. He tried the radios, first calling the aircraft directly, then the air-line. Again there was nothing. At this point, the Indianapolis controller had no knowledge of the situation in New York. He did not know that other aircraft had been hijacked. He believed American 77 had experienced serious electrical or mechanical failure, or both, and was gone.

Shortly after 9:00, Indianapolis Center started notifying other agencies that American 77 was missing and had possibly crashed. At 9:08, Indianapolis Center asked Air Force Search and Rescue at Langley Air Force Base to look for a downed aircraft. The center also contacted the West Virginia State Police and asked whether any reports of a downed aircraft had been received. At 9:09, it reported the loss of contact to the FAA regional center, which passed this information to FAA headquarters at 9:24.

By 9:20, Indianapolis Center learned that there were other hijacked aircraft, and began to doubt its initial assumption that American 77 had crashed. A discussion of this concern between the manager at Indianapolis and the Command Center in Herndon prompted it to notify some FAA field facilities that American 77 was lost. By 9:21, the Command Center, some FAA field facilities, and American Airlines had started to search for American 77. They feared it had been hijacked. At 9:25, the Command Center advised FAA headquarters of the situation.

The failure to find a primary radar return for American 77 led us to investigate this issue further. Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56. But for 8 minutes and 13 seconds, between 8:56 and 9:05, this primary radar information on American 77 was not displayed to controllers at Indianapolis Center. The reasons are technical, arising from the way the software processed radar information, as well as from poor primary radar coverage where American 77 was flying.

According to the radar reconstruction, American 77 reemerged as a primary target on Indianapolis Center radar scopes at 9:05, east of its last known position. The target remained in Indianapolis Center's airspace for another six minutes, then crossed into the western portion of Washington Center's airspace at 9:10.As Indianapolis Center continued searching for the aircraft, two managers and the controller responsible for American 77 looked to the west and southwest along the flight's projected path, not east-where the aircraft was now heading. Managers did not instruct other controllers at Indianapolis Center to turn on their primary radar coverage to join in the search for American 77.

In sum, Indianapolis Center never saw Flight 77 turn around. By the time it reappeared in primary radar coverage, controllers had either stopped looking for the aircraft because they thought it had crashed or were looking toward the west. Although the Command Center learned Flight 77 was missing, neither it nor FAA headquarters issued an all points bulletin to surrounding centers to search for primary radar targets. American 77 traveled undetected for 36 minutes on a course heading due east for Washington, D.C.


Path of Flight 77By 9:25, FAA's Herndon Command Center and FAA headquarters knew two aircraft had crashed into the World Trade Center. They knew American 77 was lost. At least some FAA officials in Boston Center and the New England Region knew that a hijacker on board American 11 had said "we have some planes." Concerns over the safety of other aircraft began to mount. A manager at the Herndon Command Center asked FAA headquarters if they wanted to order a "nationwide ground stop." While this was being discussed by executives at FAA headquarters, the Command Center ordered one at 9:25.

The Command Center kept looking for American 77. At 9:21, it advised the Dulles terminal control facility, and Dulles urged its controllers to look for primary targets. At 9:32, they found one. Several of the Dulles controllers "observed a primary radar target tracking eastbound at a high rate of speed" and notified Reagan National Airport. FAA personnel at both Reagan National and Dulles airports notified the Secret Service. The aircraft's identity or type was unknown.

Reagan National controllers then vectored an unarmed National Guard C130H cargo aircraft, which had just taken off en route to Minnesota, to identify and follow the suspicious aircraft. The C-130H pilot spotted it, identified it as a Boeing 757, attempted to follow its path, and at 9:38, seconds after impact, reported to the control tower: "looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon sir."


Debunk 911 Myths dot ORG


You need to read this:

Losing Flight 77



Quote
....see the Operation Northwoods documents


<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> Operation Northwoods <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/lol.gif" alt="" />

Once again......... irrelevant.



C'mon, now...... we know you think the Feds murdered the passengers, but....


Where's the plane?

Frank <img src="/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif" alt="" />

Re: The eons old modus operandi [Re: FrankR] #909680 01/08/09 02:31 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,634
bretwalda Offline OP
Roll Me Over
So approach radar data - from less than a mile from the airport - is completely useless. Why it is even used for control of inbound traffic at busy airports is a mystery. The FAA is lying. The independently interviewed witnesses who sketched out a flight path that unanimously follows the route of the FAA's are lying. Pentagon officials who smelled explosives are lying. Whistleblowers are lying...

Cuz Frank knows radars.

<img src="/forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

Show us the plane - lets see some o'dem pieces. Whatcha afraid of?


concreteprinter.com
Page 20 of 42 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 41 42

Moderated by  4x4Wire, Jack_Booted_Mod 







4x4Wire Social:

| 4x4Wire on FaceBook |


OutdoorWire, 4x4Wire, JeepWire, TrailTalk, MUIRNet-News, and 4x4Voice are all trademarks and publications of OutdoorWire, Inc. and MUIRNet Consulting.
Copyright (c) 1999-2019 OutdoorWire, Inc and MUIRNet Consulting - All Rights Reserved, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without express written permission
You may link freely to this site, but no further use is allowed without the express written permission of the owner of this material.
All corporate trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 16 (0.017s) Memory: 0.6818 MB (Peak: 0.8502 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-06-09 11:34:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS